Skip to content

An Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of the CathVision ECGenius® System.

A Prospective, Single-Center, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Safety and Technical Performance of the CathVision ECGenius® System.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05301803
Enrollment
27
Registered
2022-03-31
Start date
2022-03-29
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2024-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrhythmia

Keywords

electrophysiology, atrial fibrillation, cardiac ablation

Brief summary

The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and technical performance of the CathVision ECGenius® System. The secondary objective is to benchmark the intracardiac electrogram signal quality compared to commercially available systems in patients undergoing assessment and ablation of cardiac arrhythmias.

Detailed description

A prospective, single center, open-label, single arm study to evaluate the safety and technical performance of the CathVision ECGenius® system. Patients undergoing assessment and ablation of cardiac arrhythmias during an electrophysiology (EP) procedure, and who meet all inclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study and undergo the EP procedure. Intracardiac signals will be passively recorded using the CathVision ECGenius® System in parallel with a commercial EP recording system and later compared and evaluated. The investigational device will not be used for direct clinical care decisions or therapy. The EP procedure will be guided by the study site Standards Of Care.

Interventions

DEVICEElectrophysiology procedure

Electrophysiology testing and cardiac ablation of arrhythmia

Sponsors

Medicept Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
CathVision ApS
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient is scheduled for catheter ablation or diagnostic electrophysiology procedure. * At least 18 years of age. * Able and willing to provide informed consent or obtain consent from a legally authorized representative (LAR).

Exclusion criteria

* Patient inability to understand or refusal to sign informed consent. * Patient is a prisoner or under incarceration * Patients who in the opinion of the physician are not candidates for this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Baseline Noise ComparisonEP and ablation procedures can take up to six hoursMeasure the peak to peak baseline noise in two EP recording systems for both bipolar and unipolar electrograms in μV
Freedom From Major Adverse Events, Evaluated at Hospital DischargeFrom EP procedure to discharge is usually one day.Freedom from major adverse events, evaluated at hospital discharge Adverse events were categorized as one of: An adverse event (AE) A serious adverse event (SAE) An Adverse device effect (ADE) is an AE related to the use of an investigational medical device. A Serious adverse device effect (SADE) is an ADE that that has resulted in any of the consequences characteristic of an SAE. An unanticipated adverse device effect (UADE) is defined as any serious adverse effect on health, safety, any life-threatening problem, death caused by or associated with, a device, if that effect, problem, or death was not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree of incidence in predicate devices, or any other unanticipated serious problem associated with a device that relates to the rights, safety, or welfare of subjects.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Single Arm
Consecutive patients referred for an electrophysiology study or cardiac ablation.
27
Total27

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSingle Arm
Age, Continuous63.67 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.27
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
27 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Baseline Noise Comparison

Measure the peak to peak baseline noise in two EP recording systems for both bipolar and unipolar electrograms in μV

Time frame: EP and ablation procedures can take up to six hours

Population: Baseline noise

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Single ArmBaseline Noise ComparisonECGenius Bipolar Baseline Noise19 μV
Single ArmBaseline Noise ComparisonECGenius Unipolar Baseline Noise46 μV
Single ArmBaseline Noise ComparisonLabSystem Pro Bipolar Baseline Noise31 μV
Single ArmBaseline Noise ComparisonLabSystem Pro Unipolar Noise463 μV
Primary

Freedom From Major Adverse Events, Evaluated at Hospital Discharge

Freedom from major adverse events, evaluated at hospital discharge Adverse events were categorized as one of: An adverse event (AE) A serious adverse event (SAE) An Adverse device effect (ADE) is an AE related to the use of an investigational medical device. A Serious adverse device effect (SADE) is an ADE that that has resulted in any of the consequences characteristic of an SAE. An unanticipated adverse device effect (UADE) is defined as any serious adverse effect on health, safety, any life-threatening problem, death caused by or associated with, a device, if that effect, problem, or death was not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree of incidence in predicate devices, or any other unanticipated serious problem associated with a device that relates to the rights, safety, or welfare of subjects.

Time frame: From EP procedure to discharge is usually one day.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single ArmFreedom From Major Adverse Events, Evaluated at Hospital Discharge26 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026