Skip to content

Efficacy of Different Acid Suppressors in Bismuth-containing Quadruple Therapy Against Helicobacter Pylori

Efficacy of Different Acid Suppressors in Bismuth-containing Quadruple Therapy as First-line Treatment Against Helicobacter Pylori

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05301725
Enrollment
670
Registered
2022-03-31
Start date
2018-07-01
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2022-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Helicobacter Pylori; Eradication Rate

Keywords

Helicobacter pylori,eradication therapy

Brief summary

Aretrospective study was conducted to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of traditional proton pump inhibitors (PPI ) and Potassium-competitive acid blockers ( P-CAB )for clarithromycin-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in the management of Helicobacter pylori eradication.

Detailed description

This study retrospectively enrolled participants with H. pylori infection who received bismuth quadruple regimen containing clarithromycin. The basic information, treatment results, adverse reactions and compliance of the patients were collected. According to the type of acid inhibitors, participants were divided into traditional PPI group and P-CAB group. Traditional PPI group which were divided into lansoprazole group and esomeprazole group. The eradication rate, safety, compliance of H. pylori in different treatment regimens was evaluated. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of eradication failure.

Interventions

OTHERPPI regimen

All patients received PPI regimen( lansoprazole or esomeprazole,bismuth amoxicillin,clarithromycin for14 days). Demographic data,treatment regimens, outcomes of therapy, adherence to therapy and adverse event were retrieved.

OTHERP-CAB regimen

All patients received P-CAB regimen(vonoprazan,bismuth ,amoxicillin,clarithromycin for14 days). Demographic data,treatment regimens, outcomes of therapy, adherence to therapy and adverse event were retrieved.

Sponsors

Shandong University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants aged 18-75 years with persistent H. pylori infection. * Participants received clarithromycin-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients received rescue therapy * Patients treated with PPI, P-CAB,bismuth and antibiotics in the previous 4 weeks * Patients with gastorectomy * Currently pregnant or lactating or other conditions unable to receive therapy * Severe concomitant cardiovascular, respiratory, or endocrine diseases, clinically significant renal or hepatic disease, hematologic disorders and any other clinically significant medical condition that could increase risk * Severe neurologic or psychiatric disorders * Information incomplete

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of eradication success1 monthSix weeks after completion of treatment, numbers of patients get H.pylori eradicated supported by negative 13C-UBT results will be investigated by an independent researcher. Then eradication rate in each group will be calculated by using intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, modified intention to treat analysis (MITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis. The ITT analysis includes all the patients who take at least one dose of the study medications. The MITT analysis is limited to patients who complete follow-up.The PP analysis is limited to patients who take over 90% of the study medications and complete follow-up.
Prevalence of adverse events1 monthAt the follow-up, adverse events complained by patients will be recorded by an independent researcher, meanwhile CTCAE v5.0 was used to evaluate severity of adverse events.The prevalence of adverse events was compared between the two group
Number of participants with good compliance1 monthCompliance was evaluated by assessing the total pills patients have taken.Compliance was defined as good whenmore than 90% or less than 120% of the total pills were taken

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026