Skip to content

Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray in Italian Children

Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray in Italian Children With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis: a Comprehensive Assessment

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05301647
Enrollment
80
Registered
2022-03-31
Start date
2019-06-20
Completion date
2021-10-20
Last updated
2022-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergy Pollen, Child, Only, Mometasone Allergy, Nasal Allergy, Nasal, Cytology, Quality of Life, Rhinitis, Allergic

Keywords

seasonal allergic rhinitis, mometasone furoate nasal spray, nasal cytology, type 2 inflammation, symptoms, quality of life

Brief summary

Objective Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) is a common disease in childhood and characterized by type 2 inflammation, bothersome symptoms, and impaired quality of life (QoL). Intranasal corticosteroids are effective medications in managing SAR patients. In addition, mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) is a well-known therapeutic option. However, the literature provided no data about its effects in European children with SAR. Thus this study addressed this unmet need.

Detailed description

Objective Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) is a common disease in childhood and characterized by type 2 inflammation, bothersome symptoms, and impaired quality of life (QoL). Intranasal corticosteroids are effective medications in managing SAR patients. In addition, mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) is a well-known therapeutic option. However, the literature provided no data about its effects in European children with SAR. Thus this study addressed this unmet need. Methods MFNS was compared to isotonic saline. Both treatments were prescribed one spray per nostril, twice a day, per 3 weeks. Nasal cytology, total symptom score (TSS), visual analogic scale concerning the parental perception of symptom severity, and the Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) were assessed at baseline, after 7 and 21 days, and one month after discontinuation.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTNasal cytology

The cytological technique involves the following moments: sampling, processing, which includes fixation, staining and microscopic observation. Cytological sampling consists in the collection of superficial cells of the nasal mucosa with the help of a sterile swab or a small curette (scraping) in disposable plastic material (Rhino-probe).

OTHERThe validated Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ)

The validated Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) consists of 23 questions in 5 domains (nasal symptoms, ocular symptoms, practical issues, limitation of activities, other symptoms) that are answered on a 7-point scale (0-6), where 0 represents the absence of problems and 6 the greatest symptom distress. Children will complete the questionnaire together with a parent at baseline and during the study. A Total Score was calculated as the mean of the 5 domains.

OTHERTotal symptom score (TSS)

Total symptom score was the sum of 3 domains: i) nasal symptoms (TNSS) included itching, sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion; ii) ocular symptoms (TOSS): itching, hyperemia of the conjunctiva, tearing; and iii) throat symptoms (TTSS): itching, coughing. With the help of their parents, patients scored symptoms severity on a 4-point scale: 0 = absent or irrelevant, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Total symptom score was assessed at 12 hours (TTS 12h) and two weeks (TTS 2W) before the visits. TSS represents the doctor's point of view of symptom severity

OTHERVisual analogic scale (VAS)

A visual analogic scale (VAS) measured the parental perception of symptom severity (0=no symptom; 10=very severe symptoms).

Sponsors

University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion criteria were: age range 4-12 years, SAR diagnosis, Total Symptoms Score (TSS) ≥ 6, and written informed consent of both parents or legal guardians.

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in eosinophils, mast cells and neutrophil infiltrate by nasal cytology after the treatment2019-2021The primary endpoint of this study was the change in eosinophilic mast cells and neutrophil infiltrate, assessed by nasal cytology

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assesment of symptoms during the study2019-2021The secondary objective was the nasal symptom severity during the study assessed by total symptom score (TSS)
Assesment of quality of life changes during the study2019-2021The secondary objective was the changes of quality of life during the study assessed by the validated Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ)

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026