Skip to content

Pupillometry Techniques Usage to Quantify the Programming Parameters Effect in the Auditory Effort in Zti Opticon Cochlear Implant Adult Users

Pupillometry Techniques Usage to Quantify the Programming Parameters Effect in the Auditory Effort in Zti Opticon Cochlear Implant Adult Users

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05300230
Enrollment
25
Registered
2022-03-29
Start date
2020-03-15
Completion date
2022-11-15
Last updated
2022-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Keywords

Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Moderate, Severe, Zti Cochlear implant

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to establish the connection between the cochlear implant programming parameters with the auditory effort associated with the speech perception evaluated by pupillometry techniques in different audiometric conditions.

Interventions

DEVICENeuro Zti cochlear implant and Neuro 2 sound processor

The study will consist in 3 visits: * Visit 1: it will be carried out the first contact and learning the measurement procedure. * Visit 2: it will be evaluated the speech perception and the measurement of the pupil dilatation in silence and noise conditions. * Visit 3: it will be analysed the effect of the change in the cochlear implant programming parameters.

Sponsors

Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Users willing to participate in the study with signature and date of the Informed Consent. * Age between 18 and 70 years old. * At least 6 months experience with the Neuro Zti implant and Neuro 2 processor. * Unilateral, bilateral and bimodal users. * Basic understanding of oral and written Spanish. * Normal or corrected vision.

Exclusion criteria

* Speech or language disorder. * Added comorbidities or cognitive dysfunction. * Not approval to participate in the study or absence in some of the programmed sessions for the Cochlear Implant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analyze the correlation between the speech performance in cochlear implant (CI) users, as measured through the percentage of sentence recognition (%) and the auditory effort, measured by peak pupil dilatation (PPD) in mm.Up to 12 months after the beginning of the studyThe speech perception will be evaluated through validated sentence recognition tests (such as the HINT test) and the result will be the percentage of correct sentences repeated by the CI patient. The listening effort will be measured through pupillometry techniques in scenarios with different audiometric conditions (different SNR). The result will be the peak pupil dilation in mm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate the correlation between the auditory effort as measured through pupillometry techniques and the subjective sensation of the CI patient as rated through validated NASA-TLX questionnaire.Up to 12-24 months after the beginning of the studyAnalyze the correlation between the objetive auditory effort as measured through pupillometry techniques (peak pupil dilatation, PPD in mm) and the subjetive feeling of effort (fatigue, etc.) as rated by the CI patient in NASA-TLX questionnaire.
Evaluate the correlation between the auditory effort as measured through pupillometry techniques and the cognitive performance of the CI user as measured by different cognitive tests (Nback, Progressive Matrices, Stroop).Up to 12-24 months after the beginning of the studyAnalyze the correlation between the objetive auditory effort as measured through pupillometry techniques (peak pupil dilatation, PPD in mm) and the cognitive performance of the CI patient as measured through cognitive tests (Nback, Progressive Matrices, Stroop)
Analyze the differences between the auditory effort, as measured through pupillometry techniques in two different CI programming conditions.Up to 12-36 months after the beginning of the studyCompare the auditory effort made by the CI patients, as measured by pupillometry techniques, i.e., the peak pupil dilatation (PPD in mm) over two different CI programming conditions: the first condition with the noise filter capability of the CI processor in off mode (VoiceTrack OFF) and the second condition with the noise filters in ON mode (VoiceTrack ON)

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactAmparo Callejón Leblic
amparocallejon@gmail.com955 00 80 00

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026