Skip to content

Flexible URS in Management of Renal Stones in Anomalous Kidney

Flexible URS in Management of Renal Stones in Anomalous Kidney, A Prospective Case Series Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05299996
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-03-29
Start date
2022-04-15
Completion date
2023-03-01
Last updated
2022-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Congenital Disorders, Ectopic Kidney, Endourology, Horseshoe Kidney, Laser, Malrotation of Kidney, Stones, Kidney

Brief summary

The urotheliasis is a common problem encountered daily by all urologists worldwide with rates up to 13% in North America, 9% in Europe and 5% in Asia . The urotheliasis is treated by conservation, medical treatment and surgery according to many factors . Anomalies in the kidney happens due to failure in ascending , fusion, rotation or all together, horse-shoe kidney is the most common example , found in one of 400 patients . PCNL and URS are the golden standard method for stone extraction worldwide, since their introduction 1975 by Fernstrom and Johansson & Arthur Smith respectively in normal kidney .Since the development of the endourological procedures and instrument , continuous updates and upgrades have been applied ,such as enhancing the optical systems ,reducing the diameter, navigation (deflection angles) and stone fragmentation .Stone treatment in anomalous kidney is more demanding, requires more skills and training . The flexible ureterorenoscopy has some problems first the cost but this problem is being now solved by the use of disposable scopes , second the skills it requires , third the possibility of sepsis is higher . To our knowledge most of the studies in the literature are retrospective, carrying some weakness in them. There is no agreed-upon therapeutic method for treatment of stones in anomalous kidney so the investigators will evaluate the role of F-URS in a prospective study.

Interventions

stone disintegration stricture dilation tumor resection access guidance

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males and females age above 15 years. 2. Renal and ureteric stones either single or multiple wherever the site and site. 3. Pelvi-uretreic junction obstruction 4. Previous stented ureter. 5. Poorly functioning kidney. 6. Single functioning kidney. 7. Chronic kidney disease patient not on dialysis. 8. Previous operation in this kidney. 9. failed ESWL.

Exclusion criteria

1. Not fit for surgery. 2. Uncontrolled bleeding diathesis. 3. Untreated preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI). 4. non function kidney 5. skeletal abnormality

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
stone free rate post-operative1 month after treatmentCT will be done to evaluate the presence or absence of stone
Change from Baseline hematocrit after 1 day postoperative1 day after treatmentbleeding due to any error either surgical or non surgical
time of operationduring the operationthe operation will be recorded.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactabdelrahman M abdelkader, M.D.
abdelrahmanmohamed.aa@aun.edu.eg01068336396

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026