Skip to content

Influence of Pain on Exercise-induced Hypoalgesia

The Influence of Pain on Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia in Healthy Women

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05299268
Enrollment
34
Registered
2022-03-28
Start date
2022-03-08
Completion date
2022-04-12
Last updated
2022-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy, Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate how acute pain induced by hypertonic saline prior to exercise influence the magnitude of exercise-induced hypoalgesia after 1x3 min seated isometric knee extension exercise in healthy women. The study is a blinded randomized cross-over trial The results from the study may be of great importance to the understanding of exercise-induced hypoalgesia, and whether the presence of pain affects the effects of exercise.

Detailed description

Exercise is recommended to promote and maintain health and as treatment for more than 25 chronic diseases and pain conditions. The mechanisms underlying pain relief of exercise are largely unknown but may be related to the modulation of central descending pain inhibitory pathways after acute exercise bouts. Exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) is typically assessed as the temporary change in pressure pain thresholds (PPT) after a short acute exercise bout and EIH is seen as a proxy of descending pain inhibitory control. In general, EIH seems hypoalgesic (functional) in asymptomatic subjects. A hyperalgesic (impaired) EIH response has been reported in different chronic pain populations, although a functional EIH response also has been reported in subgroups of knee osteoarthritis patients. This implies differences in the acute response to exercise between healthy (pain-free) subjects and chronic pain patients, but it is still unknown whether the presence of pain itself affects the pain alleviating response (i.e. the EIH response) to acute exercise. It is hypothesized that acute pain will decrease the EIH response magnitude following hypertonic saline injection compared with the control injection. This study will increase the insight into the EIH mechanisms in healthy subjects in general, and how the presence of pain affects the body's own ability to modulate pain during exercise.

Interventions

A bolus injection (1 ml) of hypertonic saline (5.8%) is injected into the dominant vastus medialis muscle 20 cm proximal from the basis of patella before performance of the 1x3 min Seated Isometric Knee Extension.

BEHAVIORALNo pain (Isotonic saline)

A bolus injection (1 ml) of isotonic saline (0.9%) is injected into the dominant vastus medialis muscle 20 cm proximal from the basis of patella before performance of the 1x3 min Seated Isometric Knee Extension

Sponsors

University of Southern Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Aalborg University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Assessor and participants will be blinded to the order of injections.

Intervention model description

This study is a 2-arm randomized controlled cross-over trial with 1-7 days between arms

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Pain-free * Understands and writes Danish

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Previous addictive behaviour defined as abuse of hash, opioids or other euphoric substances. * Previous painful or mental illnesses, neurological or circulatory diseases in the form of heart or lung disease. * Surgery in the lower extremities within the last 12 months * Chronic or actual pain on the days of testing * Under the influence on the days of testing * Inability to cooperate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pressure pain threshold will be assessed over the dominant quadriceps muscleBaseline, Day 2 (within 1 week of baseline), Day 3 (within 1 week of Day 2)Between group comparison of the primary outcome, which is change in pressure pain threshold over the dominant quadriceps muscle before and after performing seated isometric knee extension. Pressure pain threshold is measured with a handheld pressure algometer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pressure pain threshold at the non-dominant quadriceps muscle and non-dominant trapezius muscleBaseline, Day 2 (within 1 week of baseline), Day 3 (within 1 week of Day 2)Between group comparison of the secondary outcome, which is change in pressure pain threshold at the non-dominant quadriceps muscle and non-dominant trapezius muscle from before Seated Isometric Knee Extension to after Seated Isometric Knee Extension. Pressure pain threshold is measured with a handheld pressure algometer.
Pain Intensity in dominant thighAssessed before and immediately after hypertonic and isotonic saline injection as well as 1, 2 and 3 minutes into the Seated Isometric Knee Extension, and immediately after the end of the seated isometric knee extensionPain intensity is assessed with numerical rating scales with 0 = no pain and 10 = maximal pain.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pressure pain threshold at the dominant and non-dominant thigh as well as non-dominant trapezius muscleBefore and after determining maximal voluntary contraction on the fist test day and prior to saline injectionsPressure pain threshold is measured with a handheld pressure algometer.
Pain experienceDay 3 (within 2-3 weeks of the initial session)Participants will be interviewed at the end of the study regarding the experience of pain during the study. The interview will be conducted after all other experimental procedures have been completed.
Rating of perceived exertion (RPE)Assessed 1, 2 and 3 minutes into the Seated Isometric Knee ExtensionPerceived exertion is assessed with Borg RPE scale with 6 = no exertion and 20 = maximal exertion
Quantifying the individual´s pain experienceBaselineQuantifying the individual´s pain experience will be assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) at the first session. The pain catastrophizing scale have 13 sentences regarding pain-related thoughts. Participants are asked to indicate how well each sentence applies for them: 0 = not at all, 1 = to a slight degree, 2 = to a moderate degree, 3 = to a great degree and 4 = all the time. A higher score is worse

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026