Skip to content

Diagnostic Accuracy of WEARable TECHnology Single-lead ECG in Detecting Cardiac Arrhythmias

Diagnostic Accuracy of WEARable TECHnology Single-lead ECG in Detecting Cardiac Arrhythmias: WEAR-TECH ECG

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05298553
Acronym
WEAR-TECH ECG
Enrollment
500
Registered
2022-03-28
Start date
2022-04-18
Completion date
2023-04-01
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiac Arrhythmia

Keywords

Apple Watch;, Skylabs CART-I Ring, Wearable Devices

Brief summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia (irregular heart rhythm), affecting 1-2 million people in the UK. AF significantly increases the risk of an AF-related stroke, heart failure and dementia. A significant proportion of people will have no symptoms, and they may only be found to have AF after suffering an AF-related stroke. An electrocardiogram (ECG) uses sensors placed on the skin to record the heart's electrical activity. A 12-lead ECG uses 10 sensors and is the gold-standard (best available test) to detect any abnormal heart rhythm disturbances. Until recently, a 12-lead ECG showing an irregular heart rhythm was required to make a diagnosis of AF but as AF episodes are often short and unpredictable it may be missed. Therefore, a small device that continuously records heartbeat and heart rhythm could make the diagnosis of arrhythmias and AF much quicker and easier. Accessories such as watches or rings - referred to as wearable devices - have extremely good sensors that measure pulse rate by detecting small changes in skin colour during each heartbeat and can perform a single-lead ECG. Algorithms built in the wearable devices can identify irregular heart rhythms, such as atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this study is to test two new wearable devices - the Skylabs CART-I ring and the Apple Watch - in detecting abnormal heart rhythm recording and recording ECGs. The investigators plan to recruit 500 patients attending Cardiology Departments in several hospitals in the UK and will ask them to wear the Apple Watch and the CART-I and perform 12-lead ECG with each device (two in total). No extra follow-up visits are required. At the end of the study, the investigators will compare interpretation by two cardiologists of the wearable devices' ECGs and the 12-lead ECGs and look at their ability to automatically detect abnormal rhythms.

Interventions

DEVICEGroup A

Participants will be asked to perform a simultaneous 30-seconds 12-lead ECG and single-lead ECG for each wearable device: Skylab CART-I ring followed by Apple Watch.

DEVICEGroup B

they will be asked to perform a simultaneous 30-seconds 12-lead ECG and single-lead ECG for each wearable device: Apple Watch followed by the Skylab CART-I ring.

Sponsors

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER
University Hospital Birmingham
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial. * Male or female aged 18 years or above. * Indication for 12-lead ECG.

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to comply with instructions. * Tattoos in the wrists or fingers where the device will be placed. * Severe skin allergy to silicone (Apple Watch wrist band) or nickel allergies.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare the Diagnostic Performance of Physician Rhythm Interpretation of 1-lead ECG Generated by SkyLabs CART-I Ring and Apple Watch Versus 12-lead ECG (Gold-standard) for Atrial Fibrillation1 DayAssessment of diagnostic accuracy of SkyLabs CART-I ring and Apple Watch 1-lead ECGs interpretation for for atrial fibrillaiton compared with a 12-lead ECG (gold-standard).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare the Accuracy of Automatic AF Detection of the SkyLabs CART-I Ring and Apple Watch Versus a Cardiologist Interpretation of a 12-lead ECG (Gold-standard)1 DayAssessment of diagnostic accuracy of the AF detection algorithm of the Skylab CART-I ring and Apple Watch compared to a 12-lead ECG (gold-standard).
Compare the Accuracy of ECG Interval Measurement for the SkyLabs CART-I Ring and Apple Watch to a 12-lead ECG (Gold-standard)1 DayLevel of agreement of measured interval duration between the SkyLabs CART-I ring, Apple Watch 1-lead ECG and a 12-lead ECG.
Compare the Accuracy of Heart Rate Detection of the SkyLabs CART-I Ring and Apple Watch 1-lead ECG to a 30-second 12-lead ECG1 DayCorrelation coefficient between the mean heart rate from simultaneous single lead and 12 lead ECG acquisitions.
Compare the Accuracy of Rhythm Interpretation of SkyLabs CART-I Ring 1-lead ECG to Combined PPG (Plethosysmography) Signal and 1-lead ECG.1 DayAssessmen of diagnostic accuracy of the Skylab CART-I ring if a PPG signal is added.
Compare the Accuracy of Automatic AF Detection of the SkyLabs CART-I Ring and Apple Watch Versus a Cardiologist Interpretation of a 12-lead ECG (Gold-standard) - Unclassified Excluded1 DayAssessment of diagnostic accuracy of the AF detection algorithm of the Skylab CART-I ring and Apple Watch compared to a 12-lead ECG (gold-standard) with Unclassified SL-ECG were excluded

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORTim Betts, MD

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous66 years
Atrial Fibrillation303 Participants
Atrial Tachycardia/Flutter59 Participants
BMI27.8 Kg/m2
Cardiac Surgery59 Participants
CIED47 Participants
Congestive Cardiac Failure109 Participants
Hypertension156 Participants
Ischaemic Heart Disease113 Participants
Myocardial Infarction68 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
142 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
356 Participants
Stroke/TIA30 Participants
Valvular Heart Disease90 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 4980 / 498
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 4980 / 498
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 4980 / 498

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 2, 2026