At Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Conditions
Keywords
Melon Manis Terengganu peel, Glycemic response, Perceived satiety, Food intake, At risk of type 2 diabetes
Brief summary
Open-label, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover study with two intervention arms. The study was conducted in 30 respondents and the primary objective is to show an improved glycemic response after Melon Manis Terengganu (MMT) peel powder consumption in people at risk of type 2 diabetes.
Detailed description
The main aim of the study is to investigate the acute effect of MMT peel powder on glycemic response in people at risk of type 2 diabetes. Besides, the acute effect of MMT peel powder on perceived satiety and energy intake were explored.
Interventions
Respondents were consumed 36 g of Formulation 3 containing 4.5 g of available carbohydrate dissolved in 180 ml water with study breakfast
Respondents were consumed 4.5 g of control containing 4.5 g of available carbohydrate dissolved in 180 ml water with study breakfast
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
The respondents consumed Formulation 3 (A) and control (B) with study breakfast based on randomly assigned treatment sequences (AB, BA). Each visit was separated with three days washout period and lasted about 3 hour (starting around 8 am and finishing at approximately 11 am).
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Modified Finnish Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool (FINDRISC) score ≥ 4 * Capillary fasting blood glucose (FBG) \< 7.0 mmol/L * Malaysian * Live, work or study in Kuala Nerus, Terengganu * Both gender * Age 18 to 59 years old * Non-smoker * Those taking supplement agree to undergo washout period of one week
Exclusion criteria
* Had clinical history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) * Capillary FBG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L * Take oral antidiabetic agents * Participate in other weight management programme or interventional research * On a prescribed medical diet * GI illnesses or conditions * Allergy or sensitivity to study products * Pregnant, currently breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant * On dietary restrictions * Smoker
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Blood Glucose Levels | Baseline (0 min), 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes on Day 1 and Day 4 of both study visits | Blood glucose were measured using glucometer (Accu Chek Performa, New South Wales, Australia) from finger-prick blood samples according to the standard operating procedure at baseline (0 min), 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve) | Day 1 and 4 of both study visits | Perceived satiety measurements were rated using a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) which consisted of hunger (How hungry are you?), fullness (How full are you?), desire to eat (How strong is your desire to eat?), prospective food consumption (How much would you be able to eat right now?) and thirstiness (How thirsty are you?) (Tey, Salleh, Henry, & Forde, 2017). The scale ranged from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much) measured at baseline (0 min), 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. The area under the curve was calculated using trapezoid rule. |
| Food Intake | Day 1 and 4 of both study visits | The respondents were asked to record all the food or drink they had consumed including sauces, soup and gravies using household measures once they woke up in the morning until they went to sleep at night. |
| Calories Intake | Day 1 and day 4 of both study visits | The respondents were asked to record all the food or drink they had consumed including sauces, soup and gravies using household measures once they woke up in the morning until they went to sleep at night. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Waist Circumference (cm) | Day 1 and 4 of both study visits | Waist circumference was taken at every study visit. |
| Body Weight (kg) | Day 1 and 4 of both study visits | Body weight was taken at every study visit. |
| Blood Pressure | Day 1 and 4 of both study visits | Blood pressure was measured using an Omron automatic digital blood pressure monitor (Omron HEM-7221) in a seated position at all visits after 5 min of sitting. |
| Height (cm) | Day 1 and 4 of both study visits | Height was taken at every study visit. |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m^2) | Day 1 and 4 of both study visits | BMI was calculated using formula = body weight (kg)/height (m)\^2 |
| % Body Fat | Day 1 and 4 of both study visits | % body fat was taken at every study visit. |
Countries
Malaysia
Participant flow
Recruitment details
120 participants were screened for eligibility between 18th August 2021 and 18th October 2021 in Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia,
Pre-assignment details
36 of 120 participants were randomized. 84 participants did not meet inclusion criteria.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Formulation 3 Then Control Formulated MMT peel powder (provide 5 g dietary fiber per day)
Respondents were consumed 36 g of Formulation 3 then 4.5 g of control, both containing 4.5 g of available carbohydrate dissolved in 180 ml water with study breakfast. | 15 |
| Control Then Formulation 3 Glucose
Control: Respondents were consumed 4.5 g of control then 36 g of Formulation 3, both containing 4.5 g of available carbohydrate dissolved in 180 ml water with study breakfast | 15 |
| Total | 30 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Washout (3 Days) | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Control Then Formulation 3 | Total | Formulation 3 Then Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 37.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8 | 36.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7 | 35.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment Malaysia | 15 Participants | 30 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 12 Participants | 23 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 3 Participants | 7 Participants | 4 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
Blood Glucose Levels
Blood glucose were measured using glucometer (Accu Chek Performa, New South Wales, Australia) from finger-prick blood samples according to the standard operating procedure at baseline (0 min), 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes.
Time frame: Baseline (0 min), 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes on Day 1 and Day 4 of both study visits
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formulation 3 | Blood Glucose Levels | 0 min | 5.6 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Formulation 3 | Blood Glucose Levels | 60 min | 7.4 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Formulation 3 | Blood Glucose Levels | 30 min | 6.7 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Formulation 3 | Blood Glucose Levels | 120 min | 6.5 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Formulation 3 | Blood Glucose Levels | 90 min | 6.9 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Control | Blood Glucose Levels | 120 min | 6.1 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Control | Blood Glucose Levels | 90 min | 7.0 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Control | Blood Glucose Levels | 0 min | 5.7 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Control | Blood Glucose Levels | 30 min | 7.7 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Control | Blood Glucose Levels | 60 min | 8.2 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
Calories Intake
The respondents were asked to record all the food or drink they had consumed including sauces, soup and gravies using household measures once they woke up in the morning until they went to sleep at night.
Time frame: Day 1 and day 4 of both study visits
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Formulation 3 | Calories Intake | 1796 kcal |
| Control | Calories Intake | 1893 kcal |
Food Intake
The respondents were asked to record all the food or drink they had consumed including sauces, soup and gravies using household measures once they woke up in the morning until they went to sleep at night.
Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formulation 3 | Food Intake | Carbohydrate | 219.3 g |
| Formulation 3 | Food Intake | Protein | 74.1 g |
| Formulation 3 | Food Intake | Fat | 74.3 g |
| Formulation 3 | Food Intake | Dietary fiber | 10.9 g |
| Control | Food Intake | Dietary fiber | 6.1 g |
| Control | Food Intake | Carbohydrate | 225.2 g |
| Control | Food Intake | Fat | 77.2 g |
| Control | Food Intake | Protein | 75.3 g |
Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve)
Perceived satiety measurements were rated using a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) which consisted of hunger (How hungry are you?), fullness (How full are you?), desire to eat (How strong is your desire to eat?), prospective food consumption (How much would you be able to eat right now?) and thirstiness (How thirsty are you?) (Tey, Salleh, Henry, & Forde, 2017). The scale ranged from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much) measured at baseline (0 min), 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. The area under the curve was calculated using trapezoid rule.
Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formulation 3 | Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve) | Desire to eat | 231 score on a scale*min | Standard Error 21.9 |
| Formulation 3 | Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve) | Prospective food consumption | 263 score on a scale*min | Standard Error 31 |
| Formulation 3 | Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve) | Fullness | 912 score on a scale*min | Standard Error 34 |
| Formulation 3 | Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve) | Thirstiness | 486.5 score on a scale*min | Standard Error 51.5 |
| Formulation 3 | Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve) | Hunger | 200.5 score on a scale*min | Standard Error 22.3 |
| Control | Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve) | Thirstiness | 499.5 score on a scale*min | Standard Error 45.1 |
| Control | Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve) | Hunger | 277 score on a scale*min | Standard Error 32.4 |
| Control | Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve) | Fullness | 822.5 score on a scale*min | Standard Error 41.6 |
| Control | Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve) | Prospective food consumption | 344.5 score on a scale*min | Standard Error 35 |
| Control | Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve) | Desire to eat | 329 score on a scale*min | Standard Error 32.4 |
Blood Pressure
Blood pressure was measured using an Omron automatic digital blood pressure monitor (Omron HEM-7221) in a seated position at all visits after 5 min of sitting.
Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formulation 3 | Blood Pressure | systolic blood pressure | 124 mmHg | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Formulation 3 | Blood Pressure | diastolic blood pressure | 77 mmHg | Standard Deviation 9 |
| Control | Blood Pressure | systolic blood pressure | 122 mmHg | Standard Deviation 15 |
| Control | Blood Pressure | diastolic blood pressure | 75 mmHg | Standard Deviation 9 |
% Body Fat
% body fat was taken at every study visit.
Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formulation 3 | % Body Fat | 38.9 Percentage | Standard Deviation 8.1 |
| Control | % Body Fat | 39.0 Percentage | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m^2)
BMI was calculated using formula = body weight (kg)/height (m)\^2
Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formulation 3 | Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m^2) | 29.8 kg/m^2 | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
| Control | Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m^2) | 29.8 kg/m^2 | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
Body Weight (kg)
Body weight was taken at every study visit.
Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formulation 3 | Body Weight (kg) | 75.1 kg | Standard Deviation 14.9 |
| Control | Body Weight (kg) | 75.1 kg | Standard Deviation 15 |
Height (cm)
Height was taken at every study visit.
Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formulation 3 | Height (cm) | 158.6 cm | Standard Deviation 6.3 |
| Control | Height (cm) | 158.6 cm | Standard Deviation 6.4 |
Waist Circumference (cm)
Waist circumference was taken at every study visit.
Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formulation 3 | Waist Circumference (cm) | 91.2 cm | Standard Deviation 11 |
| Control | Waist Circumference (cm) | 91.0 cm | Standard Deviation 11.3 |