Skip to content

Acute Effect of MMT Peel Powder on Glycemic Response, Satiety, and Food Intake in Adults at Risk for Type 2 Diabetes

Acute Effect of Melon Manis Terengganu Peel Powder on Glycemic Response, Satiety, and Food Intake in Adults at Risk for Type 2 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05298111
Enrollment
36
Registered
2022-03-28
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2021-11-03
Last updated
2024-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

At Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Melon Manis Terengganu peel, Glycemic response, Perceived satiety, Food intake, At risk of type 2 diabetes

Brief summary

Open-label, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover study with two intervention arms. The study was conducted in 30 respondents and the primary objective is to show an improved glycemic response after Melon Manis Terengganu (MMT) peel powder consumption in people at risk of type 2 diabetes.

Detailed description

The main aim of the study is to investigate the acute effect of MMT peel powder on glycemic response in people at risk of type 2 diabetes. Besides, the acute effect of MMT peel powder on perceived satiety and energy intake were explored.

Interventions

Respondents were consumed 36 g of Formulation 3 containing 4.5 g of available carbohydrate dissolved in 180 ml water with study breakfast

OTHERControl

Respondents were consumed 4.5 g of control containing 4.5 g of available carbohydrate dissolved in 180 ml water with study breakfast

Sponsors

National University of Malaysia
CollaboratorOTHER
Universiti Sains Malaysia
CollaboratorOTHER
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The respondents consumed Formulation 3 (A) and control (B) with study breakfast based on randomly assigned treatment sequences (AB, BA). Each visit was separated with three days washout period and lasted about 3 hour (starting around 8 am and finishing at approximately 11 am).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Modified Finnish Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool (FINDRISC) score ≥ 4 * Capillary fasting blood glucose (FBG) \< 7.0 mmol/L * Malaysian * Live, work or study in Kuala Nerus, Terengganu * Both gender * Age 18 to 59 years old * Non-smoker * Those taking supplement agree to undergo washout period of one week

Exclusion criteria

* Had clinical history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) * Capillary FBG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L * Take oral antidiabetic agents * Participate in other weight management programme or interventional research * On a prescribed medical diet * GI illnesses or conditions * Allergy or sensitivity to study products * Pregnant, currently breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant * On dietary restrictions * Smoker

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood Glucose LevelsBaseline (0 min), 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes on Day 1 and Day 4 of both study visitsBlood glucose were measured using glucometer (Accu Chek Performa, New South Wales, Australia) from finger-prick blood samples according to the standard operating procedure at baseline (0 min), 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve)Day 1 and 4 of both study visitsPerceived satiety measurements were rated using a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) which consisted of hunger (How hungry are you?), fullness (How full are you?), desire to eat (How strong is your desire to eat?), prospective food consumption (How much would you be able to eat right now?) and thirstiness (How thirsty are you?) (Tey, Salleh, Henry, & Forde, 2017). The scale ranged from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much) measured at baseline (0 min), 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. The area under the curve was calculated using trapezoid rule.
Food IntakeDay 1 and 4 of both study visitsThe respondents were asked to record all the food or drink they had consumed including sauces, soup and gravies using household measures once they woke up in the morning until they went to sleep at night.
Calories IntakeDay 1 and day 4 of both study visitsThe respondents were asked to record all the food or drink they had consumed including sauces, soup and gravies using household measures once they woke up in the morning until they went to sleep at night.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Waist Circumference (cm)Day 1 and 4 of both study visitsWaist circumference was taken at every study visit.
Body Weight (kg)Day 1 and 4 of both study visitsBody weight was taken at every study visit.
Blood PressureDay 1 and 4 of both study visitsBlood pressure was measured using an Omron automatic digital blood pressure monitor (Omron HEM-7221) in a seated position at all visits after 5 min of sitting.
Height (cm)Day 1 and 4 of both study visitsHeight was taken at every study visit.
Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m^2)Day 1 and 4 of both study visitsBMI was calculated using formula = body weight (kg)/height (m)\^2
% Body FatDay 1 and 4 of both study visits% body fat was taken at every study visit.

Countries

Malaysia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

120 participants were screened for eligibility between 18th August 2021 and 18th October 2021 in Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia,

Pre-assignment details

36 of 120 participants were randomized. 84 participants did not meet inclusion criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Formulation 3 Then Control
Formulated MMT peel powder (provide 5 g dietary fiber per day) Respondents were consumed 36 g of Formulation 3 then 4.5 g of control, both containing 4.5 g of available carbohydrate dissolved in 180 ml water with study breakfast.
15
Control Then Formulation 3
Glucose Control: Respondents were consumed 4.5 g of control then 36 g of Formulation 3, both containing 4.5 g of available carbohydrate dissolved in 180 ml water with study breakfast
15
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Washout (3 Days)Withdrawal by Subject33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl Then Formulation 3TotalFormulation 3 Then Control
Age, Continuous37.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
36.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
35.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Malaysia
15 Participants30 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants23 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Blood Glucose Levels

Blood glucose were measured using glucometer (Accu Chek Performa, New South Wales, Australia) from finger-prick blood samples according to the standard operating procedure at baseline (0 min), 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes.

Time frame: Baseline (0 min), 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes on Day 1 and Day 4 of both study visits

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Formulation 3Blood Glucose Levels0 min5.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.4
Formulation 3Blood Glucose Levels60 min7.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1
Formulation 3Blood Glucose Levels30 min6.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.6
Formulation 3Blood Glucose Levels120 min6.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.6
Formulation 3Blood Glucose Levels90 min6.9 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.8
ControlBlood Glucose Levels120 min6.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.6
ControlBlood Glucose Levels90 min7.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1
ControlBlood Glucose Levels0 min5.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.4
ControlBlood Glucose Levels30 min7.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.7
ControlBlood Glucose Levels60 min8.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.2
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Calories Intake

The respondents were asked to record all the food or drink they had consumed including sauces, soup and gravies using household measures once they woke up in the morning until they went to sleep at night.

Time frame: Day 1 and day 4 of both study visits

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Formulation 3Calories Intake1796 kcal
ControlCalories Intake1893 kcal
p-value: 0.001Sign test
Secondary

Food Intake

The respondents were asked to record all the food or drink they had consumed including sauces, soup and gravies using household measures once they woke up in the morning until they went to sleep at night.

Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Formulation 3Food IntakeCarbohydrate219.3 g
Formulation 3Food IntakeProtein74.1 g
Formulation 3Food IntakeFat74.3 g
Formulation 3Food IntakeDietary fiber10.9 g
ControlFood IntakeDietary fiber6.1 g
ControlFood IntakeCarbohydrate225.2 g
ControlFood IntakeFat77.2 g
ControlFood IntakeProtein75.3 g
p-value: <0.001Sign test
Secondary

Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve)

Perceived satiety measurements were rated using a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) which consisted of hunger (How hungry are you?), fullness (How full are you?), desire to eat (How strong is your desire to eat?), prospective food consumption (How much would you be able to eat right now?) and thirstiness (How thirsty are you?) (Tey, Salleh, Henry, & Forde, 2017). The scale ranged from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much) measured at baseline (0 min), 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. The area under the curve was calculated using trapezoid rule.

Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Formulation 3Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve)Desire to eat231 score on a scale*minStandard Error 21.9
Formulation 3Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve)Prospective food consumption263 score on a scale*minStandard Error 31
Formulation 3Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve)Fullness912 score on a scale*minStandard Error 34
Formulation 3Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve)Thirstiness486.5 score on a scale*minStandard Error 51.5
Formulation 3Perceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve)Hunger200.5 score on a scale*minStandard Error 22.3
ControlPerceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve)Thirstiness499.5 score on a scale*minStandard Error 45.1
ControlPerceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve)Hunger277 score on a scale*minStandard Error 32.4
ControlPerceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve)Fullness822.5 score on a scale*minStandard Error 41.6
ControlPerceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve)Prospective food consumption344.5 score on a scale*minStandard Error 35
ControlPerceived Satiety (Area Under the Curve)Desire to eat329 score on a scale*minStandard Error 32.4
p-value: <0.001Paired t-test
Other Pre-specified

Blood Pressure

Blood pressure was measured using an Omron automatic digital blood pressure monitor (Omron HEM-7221) in a seated position at all visits after 5 min of sitting.

Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Formulation 3Blood Pressuresystolic blood pressure124 mmHgStandard Deviation 14
Formulation 3Blood Pressurediastolic blood pressure77 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
ControlBlood Pressuresystolic blood pressure122 mmHgStandard Deviation 15
ControlBlood Pressurediastolic blood pressure75 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
p-value: 0.105Paired t-test
Other Pre-specified

% Body Fat

% body fat was taken at every study visit.

Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Formulation 3% Body Fat38.9 PercentageStandard Deviation 8.1
Control% Body Fat39.0 PercentageStandard Deviation 8.3
p-value: 0.624Paired t-test
Other Pre-specified

Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m^2)

BMI was calculated using formula = body weight (kg)/height (m)\^2

Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Formulation 3Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m^2)29.8 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 5.1
ControlBody Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m^2)29.8 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 5.1
p-value: 0.653Paired t-test
Other Pre-specified

Body Weight (kg)

Body weight was taken at every study visit.

Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Formulation 3Body Weight (kg)75.1 kgStandard Deviation 14.9
ControlBody Weight (kg)75.1 kgStandard Deviation 15
p-value: 0.894Paired t-test
Other Pre-specified

Height (cm)

Height was taken at every study visit.

Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Formulation 3Height (cm)158.6 cmStandard Deviation 6.3
ControlHeight (cm)158.6 cmStandard Deviation 6.4
p-value: 0.629Paired t-test
Other Pre-specified

Waist Circumference (cm)

Waist circumference was taken at every study visit.

Time frame: Day 1 and 4 of both study visits

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Formulation 3Waist Circumference (cm)91.2 cmStandard Deviation 11
ControlWaist Circumference (cm)91.0 cmStandard Deviation 11.3
p-value: 0.414Paired t-test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026