Skip to content

Guidelines for Parental Involvement in the Care of Suicidal Youth

Developing Guidelines for Parental Involvement in the Emergency Care of Suicidal Adolescents and Young Adults: a Qualitative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05296343
Acronym
S-Urg-Quali
Enrollment
61
Registered
2022-03-25
Start date
2022-05-18
Completion date
2024-10-31
Last updated
2024-11-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emergencies, Suicide, Attempted

Keywords

Adolescent, Parent, Qualitative study, Guidelines

Brief summary

Parents occupy a central place in the emergency care of suicidal adolescents and young adults. However, from 15 to 25yo, three different administrative situations exist in France: * \<16yo: admission to a child ED by a team trained to receive the youngest patients. * 16-18yo: admission to an adult ED by team devoted to adult care, no exit without parents' authorization. * \>18yo: admission to an adult ED by team. Laying on qualitative observational protocol and a Delphi approach, this study will explore the perspective of adolescents and young adults following a suicidal attempt, the perspective of their parents, and the perspective of their healthcare professionals to build guidelines for parental involvement in care of suicidal youths.

Detailed description

Suicide is the second leading cause of death among 15-25 year olds, with the highest rate of hospitalization for SC of any age group. The psychopathology of suicidal behavior in adolescents and young adults (AYA) is homogeneous: risk factors, precipitating factors, representations. Parents occupy a central place in care. They are i) involved in the care decision; ii) actively involved in care; and ii) a source of motivation for trust and adherence to care. However, if the psychopathology of suicidal crisis is homogeneous, the transition between pediatric and adult care implies very different management in the emergency department (ED). In France, three situations can be described: * \<16yo: admission to a child ED by a team trained to receive the youngest patients. * 16-18yo: admission to an adult ED by team devoted to adult care, no exit without parents' authorization. * \>18yo: admission to an adult ED by team devoted to adult care, no right to contact the parents in case of patient opposition. * Before 16 years of age: admission to the children's UAS, care by a team trained to receive the youngest patients. * 16-18 years: admission to the adult UAS, care by adult professionals, clinical and legal particularities of care for minors. * After 18 years old: admission to adult UAS, legal constraints of the adult care setting. The objectives of this qualitative observational study is to build guidelines for the involvement of the parents in the care in these three situations. The study will include adolescents and young adults from the three situations, their parents and the professionals who take care of them. Individual semi-structured interviews will be organized to collect their experiences. Qualitative analyses will be conduct, following Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. A pre-approved guideline will be construct and a Delphi approach will be conducted to approved the final version of the guideline.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 25 Years

Inclusion criteria

Adolescents and Young adults * Admitted to an Emergency Department (ED) following a suicidal act or considered as such by the medical team Parents * Parents of the included youths \>18y Healthcare professionals * \>18y * Working in ED * Usually taking care of suicidal youths All the participants * French speaking * Affiliation to a social security regime * Participation agreement

Exclusion criteria

All the participants * Present an acute somatic or psychiatric disease which may hinder the well organization of the interview

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Developing guidelines defining the role of parents in the medical decision and the care of the youthsDay 1Thematic framework summarizing the perspectives of three groups of participants.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Describing each context of careDay 1Qualitative description of each of the three context of care (\<16y, 16-18y, \>18y)
Describing expectations from each groupDay 1Qualitative description of each of the three participant groups (adolescents and young adults, parents, professionals)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026