Skip to content

B Cell Tailored Ocrelizumab Versus Standard Ocrelizumab in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Efficacy, Safety and Cost-effectiveness of B Cell Tailored Ocrelizumab Versus Standard Ocrelizumab in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05296161
Acronym
BLOOMS
Enrollment
296
Registered
2022-03-25
Start date
2022-04-20
Completion date
2027-03-01
Last updated
2026-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

Keywords

ocrevus, ocrelizumab, personalised dosing

Brief summary

Rationale: B-cell depleting therapies like ocrelizumab are very effective in the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). As B cell repopulation varies extensively between individuals (ranging from 27-175 weeks), using a treatment scheme with a fixed infusion interval may be suboptimal. So far personalized adapted treatment of ocrelizumab in RRMS has not been studied in a prospective setting. Objective: Evaluating the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of ocrelizumab when administered in personalized B cell tailored intervals in RRMS patients. Study design: This is a national multicenter randomized controlled trial with 96 week follow-up. Study population: The study population consists of 296 adult RRMS patients who have received ocrelizumab treatment for a minimum of 12 months (2x 300 mg infusion and 1x 600mg infusion). Intervention: Patients will be randomized into the standard interval group (600 mg infusions every 24 weeks) or the personalized interval group in which the infusions will be extended as long as the serum CD19 B cell count is below 10 CD19 cells/µL, determined every 4 weeks. Main study parameters: To conclude non-inferiority of personalized B cell tailored ocrelizumab there will be two co-primary endpoints: 1. the difference of percentage of confirmed relapse-free patients between the two groups after 96 weeks and 2. the difference of percentage of patients free from new/enlarging T2 lesions on MRI between the two groups after 96 weeks. Secondary study parameters are number of confirmed relapses, annualized relapse rate, number of new T2 lesions and brain atrophy on MRI, disability progression, no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), MS disease biomarkers (serum neurofilament light), quality of life, burden of treatment, immunoglobulin levels and (serious) adverse events including occurrence of infections and COVID-19. Furthermore, various immune cell subsets will be studied in relation to ocrelizumab concentration in a subgroup. Nature and extent of the burden and risks: All patients will be subjected to visits every 24 weeks including clinical scoring and questionnaires. Blood samples and MRI scans will be taken and performed every 48 weeks. Continuous assessment of key stroke dynamics on the patients smartphone and monthly digital cognitive test and walk test will be performed in most patients. As CD19 B cells are kept near complete depletion, the estimated risk of recurrence of disease activity is very low.

Interventions

DRUGOcrelizumab

Personalized B cell tailored ocrelizumab treatment

Sponsors

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial in The Netherlands

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A current diagnosis of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis according to the 2017 McDonald criteria34 * EDSS score of 0 to 6.5 * Treatment with ocrelizumab for a minimum of 48 weeks (two 300 mg infusions and one 600 mg infusion)

Exclusion criteria

* Previous treatment with alemtuzumab, cladribine or stem cell transplantation * Relapse in the past 3 months prior to inclusion * Subsequent treatment with another DMT next to ocrelizumab in the past 6 months prior to inclusion * Inability to undergo regular MRI scanning * Women who are pregnant or expect to become pregnant during the study period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Confirmed relapse-free patients96 weeksDifference of percentage of confirmed relapse-free patients between the two treatment groups after 96 weeks follow-up.
Change of T2 lesions on brain MR96 weeksDifference of percentage of patients without new/enlarging T2 MRI lesions between the two treatment groups after 96 weeks follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Annualized relapse rateBaseline, year 1, year 2Clinical relapses during B-cell tailored dosing
Total number of active (new and/or enlarging) T2 lesions on brain MRIBaseline, year 1, year 2In comparison to the baseline MRI and number of active MRI scans.
Disability progression during follow-upBaseline, 6 months,12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsDisability progression measured on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
Brain atrophyBaseline, year 1, year 2Rate of brain atrophy comparing baseline MRI and MRI at 96 weeks.
NEDA (no evidence of disease activity)96 weeksNEDA is defined as absence of confirmed relapses, MRI disease activity (new/enlarging T2 lesions) and confirmed disability progression.
Change of neurofilament light96 weeksMeasured in serum
Change of quality of lifeBaseline, year 1, year 2Measured by the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29)
Change of burden of treatmentBaseline, year 1, year 2measured by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)
Ocrelizumab wearing-off effectBaseline, year 1, year 2Presence of a possible wearing-off effect measured by a questionnaire developed by the Amsterdam MS Center
IgG levelsBaseline, year 1, year 2Change of IgG levels
Cost analysis96 weeksCost-utility analysis using EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D)
Disability progression: decrease of hand mobilityBaseline, 6 months,12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsSignificant decrease of hand mobility measured by an app that analyses key stroke dynamics. The dynamics are measured continuously and analysed every 6 months.
Disability progression: two minute walking distanceBaseline, 6 months,12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsSignificant decrease of walking distance measured by an app that analyses distance using GPS signal. The test is taken monthly and analysed every 6 months.
Disability progression: cognitive impairmentBaseline, 6 months,12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsSignificant decrease of cognitive impairment measured by an app that is validated for a digital Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). The test is taken monthly and analysed every 6 months.

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJoep Killestein, Prof.

Amsterdam UMC, location VU

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026