Knee Osteoarthritis
Conditions
Keywords
knee alignment, knee arthroplasty, tibial component rotation
Brief summary
The primary aim of this study is to find a possible correlation between tibial tuberosity rotation and coronal leg alignment. If correlation exists, a more individual tibial component rotation might be proposed during a total knee arthroplasty.
Detailed description
A malalignment of the tibial component is a possible source of pain after a total knee arthroplasty. Currently, an internal rotation of the tibial component of 18 degrees is considered as a golden standard. The value was obtained as an average rotation in the osteoarthritic knees scheduled for a total knee arthroplasty. It is known that the femur internally rotates with the increasing valgus alignment. It would seem logical that also tibial rotation correlates with the coronal limb alignment (varus-valgus). The plan is to measure the native tibial rotation (angle between the transposed epicondylar line and the posterior cruciate-tibial tuberosity line). In order to get the necessary accuracy a CT of lower legs will be obtained in patients waiting for the knee replacement. If there is a correlation between the angles the adjustment of the tibial component rotation more to the patient's anatomy could be proposed. A secondary outcome measure is the possible correlation between the proximal femoral anteversion and the tibial tuberosity rotation. The hypothesis is that the extensor mechanism follows the proximal femoral orientation. With increasing femoral anteversion (increases with valgus angle) the femoral part of the knee rotates internally. In order to keep the extensor mechanism in the direction of walking, a more lateralized position of the tibial tuberosity is expected.
Interventions
RADIATIONCT scan
CT of lower leg
Sponsors
Valdoltra Orthopedic Hospital
Study design
Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* patients requiring knee arthroplasty
Exclusion criteria
* women in reproductive age, patients with leg deformities and previous hip/knee surgery
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation between coronal alignment and tibial tuberosity rotation | Before surgery | A hip-knee-ankle angle and a tibial rotation angle (angle between the transposed epicondylar line) will be calculated from the CT scan of the leg. A correlation between both angles will be analysed using the Spearmans's coefficient. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation between femoral anteversion and tibial tuberosity position | Before surgery | A femoral anteversion angle (angle between femoral hip neck and posterior condylar knee line) and tibial tuberosity position (angle between posterior condylar line and posterior cruciate - tibial tuberosity line) will be measured and examined for correlation using a Spearman's coefficient. |
| Difference in tibial tuberosity position according to the osteoarthritis grade | Before surgery | Tibial tuberosity position will be compared according to the Kellgren-Lawrence grade with the ANOVA |
Countries
Slovenia
Outcome results
None listed