Skip to content

Validation of Optical Genome Mapping for the Identification of Constitutional Genomic Variants in a Postnatal Cohort

Validation of Optical Genome Mapping for the Identification of Constitutional Genomic Variants in a Postnatal Cohort

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05295277
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2022-03-25
Start date
2020-11-30
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2023-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder, Congenital Anomaly, Developmental Disability, Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy 1, Fragile X Syndrome, Intellectual Disability

Keywords

Validation study, Comparison study, New technology compared to standard of care

Brief summary

The purpose of this research use only (RUO) study is to detect genomic structural variants (SVs) in human DNA by Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) using the Bionano Genomics Saphyr system. SVs are a type of genetic alternation that includes deletions, duplications, and both balanced and unbalanced rearrangements (ex: inversions or translocations), as well as specific repeat expansions and contractions. The results of OGM analysis will be compared to prior clinical genetic test results to determine how OGM compares to current standard of care (SOC) clinical test methods such as chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), karyotyping, Southern blot analysis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and/or next generation sequencing (NGS), etc.

Detailed description

Optical genome mapping (OGM) is an emerging next-generation cytogenomic tool that enables a comprehensive analysis of structural variants (SVs) in the genome. OGM, in its current iteration, is performed on the Saphyr system, which is developed and marketed by Bionano Genomics (San Diego, CA). OGM employs imaging of ultra-long DNA molecules (\>150 kbp) that are labeled at a unique 6 base-pair sequence motif (CTTAAG) that occurs throughout the genome. The images of the labeled DNA molecules are used to generate a de novo assembly that can be compared to a reference genome to identify all classes of SVs, such as deletions, duplications, balanced/ unbalanced genomic rearrangements (insertions, inversions, and translocations), and repeat array expansions/contractions). In addition, a separate coverage-based algorithm enables the detection of genome-wide copy number analysis (similar to CMA), and the absence of heterozygosity (AOH) analysis. In the same assay, a concurrent or stepwise data analysis pipeline allows for sizing pathogenic CGG repeat expansions (consistent with fragile X syndrome) as well as D4Z4 repeat contractions which are consistent with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1 (FSHD1). Recently, in several studies, OGM has demonstrated excellent concordance with standard-of-care testing. Importantly, the OGM workflow can provide results within three-five days. The aim of this double-blinded, multi-site, retrospective, observational, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved study is to evaluate the concordance of structural variant detection by OGM compared to standard of care tests (such as CMA, karyotyping, Southern blot analysis, PCR, FISH, and/or NGS, etc.), in a large cohort containing a variety of SVs including aneuploidies, intragenic and contiguous deletions, duplications, balanced and unbalanced translocations, inversions, isochromosomes, ring chromosomes, repeat expansions, repeat contractions, and more. This study is also designed to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of OGM analysis conducted at multiple sites, by numerous operators, and on different Saphyr instruments. Consensus testing and interpretation protocols were developed and implemented at all sites.

Interventions

OTHERStandard of care genetic testing group

N/A - no intervention as this is an observational study.

Sponsors

University of Rochester
CollaboratorOTHER
Columbia University
CollaboratorOTHER
Greenwood Genetic Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Praxis Genomics
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Augusta University
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical College of Wisconsin
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Iowa
CollaboratorOTHER
Bionano Genomics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Individual with a genomic aberration identified by CMA, karyotyping, Southern blot analysis, PCR, FISH, and/or NGS or other standard of care (SOC) genetic testing technology whose clinical test results are available to compare with results from OGM. 2. Patients with prior negative SOC genetic testing results whose results are available to compare with results from OGM.

Exclusion criteria

1. Any individual who opted-out of research at the testing laboratory. 2. An individual whose genetic test contains the following variants: pathogenic sequence variants, abnormalities involving acrocentric p-arms and centromeres, below 20% for mosaicism, and tetraploidy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity/Concordance and specificity of OGM with standard of care testing for detection of structural variants.Through study completion, an average of 1 yearOGM results are evaluated against the standard of care test and concordance (sensitivity and specificity) will be determined.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reproducibility and identification of structural variants beyond the limit of detection of standard of care methods.Through study completion, an average of 1 yearInter-site as well as inter and intra-run variability of OGM will be assessed by reproducibility studies.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactAlex Hastie, PhD
ahastie@bionanogenomics.com267-315-0914
Backup ContactMegan Martin, MS
mmartin@bionano.com801-931-6203

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026