Healthy
Conditions
Keywords
emotion regulation, future-oriented motivation, salivary biomarkers, acculturative stress, salivary cortisol, C-reactive protein
Brief summary
Higher education is crucial for young adults in their intake of knowledge and skills to further their careers and reach their potentials. However, going through college is not necessarily an easy path. The purpose of this study is to enhance university students' well-being and educational experience by examining factors associated with stress and well-being. The investigator plans to recruit eighty participants from a large public university in the US to provide survey data and saliva samples at two waves during the data collection semester (beginning and end of the semester). Survey data will include demographic information and help gauge psychosocial factors related to stress and well-being. Saliva will be tested for two biomarkers each wave of data collection, cortisol (sampling three times a day for diurnal patterns for two consecutive days) and c-reactive protein, which indicate physiological stress/immune responses. Additionally, participants be randomly assigned to an intervention (n = 40) or control group (n = 40), where the intervention group will undertake a brief intervention focused on motivation and emotion regulation circa mid-semester and the control group will receive a placebo goal-setting short training. The investigator aims to examine whether intervention efforts can enhance end-of-semester psychological and physiological well-being, and particularly, whether students from diverse backgrounds (e.g., first-generation, low-income, and/or BIPOC) can benefit from the intervention. The investigator will use advanced quantitative data analysis (using Mplus v.8, in a structural equation modeling framework) to examine intervention efficacy and group differences. The investigator hypothesizes that those receiving the intervention will display a healthier profile at the end of the semester compared to their control group counterparts; and the investigator hypothesize students from diverse backgrounds will have significantly improved results from the intervention. The study will allow a better understanding to crucial steps towards exploring how to improve the well-being, higher-education pipeline, and retention of students with diverse backgrounds, providing insight on how each student's university experience can be improved.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALContextualized Wish-Outcome-Obstacle-Plan (WOOP) intervention
This intervention will ask students to identify socio-culturally integrated academic or personal goals, so that students may be able to better strategize obstacle-overcoming to attain their future academic aspirations and modulate negative emotions or environments and associated physiological responses.
BEHAVIORALPlacebo
The placebo control group will receive a 5- to 10-minute online goal-setting video tutorial and confirm that they have completed it by filling out an online check-list.
Sponsors
University of Arizona
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Masking description
Participants will not know which group they are assigned to. Each participant will receive a debriefing form at the end of the study for transparency, and control group participants will also receive the intervention kit at the completion of the study for equal opportunity.
Intervention model description
Upon study enrollment, participants will be randomly assigned to either the placebo control group, or the intervention group. We will ask all participants to complete two waves of data collection on survey data and salivary samples (Wave 1 \[W1\] data collection will occur at the beginning of the semester; Wave 2 \[W2\] data collection will occur near the end of the semester). Between W1 and W2 data collection (circa mid-semester), each group will receive instructions on an intervention (placebo for the control group), and we will assess if there are any outcome differences between the two groups at the end of the semester.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* participants who are currently enrolled students at a large public university in the Southwest of US.
Exclusion criteria
* individuals below the age of 18 or those who are not currently enrolled students at said university.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Salivary diurnal cortisol pattern change (from baseline to end-of-semester) | Salivary cortisol samples will be collected for two consecutive days per wave, three times per day (upon-awakening, 30-min after wake, and before bedtime), at Wave 1 (baseline, Week 3 of semester) and Wave 2 (end-of-semester, Week 16) of data collection | Salivary cortisol (µg/dL) samples will be used to examine Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis regulation and diurnal patterns of cortisol levels as a primary outcome. |
| Salivary C-reactive protein change (from baseline to end-of-semester) | Saliva samples will be collected for two consecutive days per wave, one time per day and averaged for reliability, at Wave 1 (baseline, Week 3 of semester) and Wave 2 (end-of-semester, circa Week 16) of data collection | Salivary C-reactive protein (pg/mL) samples will be used to gauge participant well-being (as an inflammatory marker and risk factor for poor health) |
| Acculturative stress change (from baseline to end-of-semester) | Assessed once per wave at Wave 1 (baseline, circa Week 3 of semester) and Wave 2 (circa Week 16, end-of-semester) of data collection | Acculturative stress will be assessed using the Societal, Attitudinal, Environment, and Familial Acculturation Stress scale (Mena et al., 1987), 24 items, 6-point Likert scale (0 = does not apply to 5 = extremely stressful), higher scores indicate more stress (worse outcome). |
| Quality of life (visual analogue) change (from baseline to end-of-semester) | Assessed once per wave at Wave 1 (baseline, circa Week 3 of semester) and Wave 2 (circa Week 16, end-of-semester) of data collection | Quality of life will be assessed using a visual analogue (sliding scale from 0-100) |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed