Skip to content

Implementing Long-Acting Novel Antiretrovirals

Implementing Long-Acting Novel Antiretrovirals - the ILANA Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05294159
Acronym
ILANA
Enrollment
114
Registered
2022-03-24
Start date
2022-07-18
Completion date
2023-12-22
Last updated
2024-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Human Immunodeficiency Viruses

Keywords

HIV-1, Long-acting antivirals, Implementation science

Brief summary

This is a 12-month, dual arm, phase 4, open-label, multi-centre study examining the implementation of LA intra-muscular (IM) drugs in clinics and decentralised community-based settings in the UK.

Detailed description

Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine (CAB+RPV) LA, is recommended in European US and British guidelines as a treatment for HIV-1 that allows PWH to receive a two-monthly injectable treatment, rather than daily pills. Providing injectable therapy in a system designed to provide and manage patients on oral treatments poses logistical challenges namely how resources are used to accommodate patient preference within a constrained health economy with capacity limitations. Exploring the use of alternative settings for injection, including community-based settings to deliver CAB+RPV LA, has the potential to expand options and potentially improve clinic capacity. Many PWH report high levels of stigma when attending the HIV clinic which can affect engagement with care, so receiving care in a community setting may provide additional choices and the possibility of receiving treatment in a less medicalized setting. Implementation studies in Europe are also assessing this in their countries. The National Health Service (NHS) in the UK is a very specific health environment where people are entitled to treatment and care which is free at the point of delivery. Unlike other medical specialties where primary care physicians are responsible for prescribing treatment for chronic conditions, PWH are managed and receive their HIV treatment in HIV and sexual health clinics. For the circa 105K people with HIV in the UK, outcomes are excellent. More than 95% of those on treatment have undetectable viral loads. However, around 8100 people in the UK are not able to take oral ART successfully. US guidelines have specified that LA CAB+ RPV is particularly important for those who experience pill fatigue, stigma and have fears of inadvertent disclosure. This is highly relevant to the ethnically diverse population of people in the UK living with HIV, many of whom come from marginalized and minoritized communities in which stigma is rife and in whom the treatment outcomes are the poorest. Women, racially minoritized people and older people are chronically under-represented in HIV clinical trials which is why we have set recruitment caps to ensure we recruit 50% women, 50% ethnically diverse people and 30% over 50 years of age. This is to ensure that we go beyond lip-service and hold ourselves to account in designing our trials with peer researcher involvement from the outset and committing to include a more representative study population. We will achieve this by engaging actively with community organisations to ensure awareness of this implementation trials. The study will be conducted at six large clinic sites both in London and outside of London. In this pragmatic real-world trial, each site will identify the most workable option to deliver of CAB+RPV LA according to SmPC license in the community setting within their region or borough.

Interventions

OTHERThe Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) and Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

The Feasibility and Acceptability of Intervention Measure (FIM and AIM) are used to evaluate the feasibilit and acceptability of our implementation strategies. The FIM and AIM is a validated implementation outcome measure where higher scores indicate greater feasibility and acceptability

Sponsors

Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Barts & The London NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Queen Mary University of London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ≥ 18 years of age * Documented HIV-1 infection * Virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA \<50 copies/ml) on a stable antiretroviral regimen * Able and willing to complete informed consent prior to inclusion * No hepatitis B * In accordance with EU license and NICE guidance

Exclusion criteria

* Based on contraindication for CAB LA, RPV LA, in accordance with EU license and NICE guidance * Prior virologic failure on substances of NNRTI or INI class * Resistance mutations to any substance of the NNRTI or INI class * Prior exposure to CAB + RPV LA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants that agree or completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) on the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) (a validated method)12 monthsTo evaluate feasibility of CAB and RPV LA administration at clinics in England and community based settings by patients

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Qualitative interviews to ascertain patient preference for setting they receive injections and the reasons for their choice12 MonthsTo describe patient preference for setting they receive injections and the reasons for their choice
Questionnaire checklist of Blueprint activities documentation to ascertain adaptations to Blueprints12 monthsTo evaluate the fidelity to Blueprint by Community Nurse or Clinic Nurse
Qualitative interviews to ascertain the utility of Facilitation Calls to improve implementation from the HIV clinic staff, Community Nurses, Clinic Nurses12 monthsTo evaluate the utility of Facilitation Calls to improve implementation from the HIV clinic staff, Community Nurses, Clinic Nurses
HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQs-12) (a validated questionnaire) to assess and ascertain the change in treatment satisfaction score over time and by setting12 monthsTo describe the change in treatment satisfaction score over time and by setting
Validated questionnaires to describe tolerability and acceptance of injections12 MonthsTo describe tolerability and acceptance of injections
Validated questionnaires and qualitative interviews to ascertain participants' overall treatment experience preference and medical need for long-acting therapy12 MonthsTo describe participants' overall treatment experience preference and medical need for long-acting therapy
Proportion of care provider and nurse participants that agree or completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) on the FIM and via qualitative interviewsAt Day 0, 4 Months and 12 MonthsTo evaluate feasibility of CAB and RPV LA administration at 6 English clinics and decentralised community settings by healthcare professionals (HCPs)
Proportion of care provider and nurse participants that agree or completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) (a validated method)At Day 0, 4 Months and 12 MonthsTo evaluate acceptability of CAB and RPV LA by participants and clinic staff
Proportion of community site representatives that agree or completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) score of on the FIM and AIM with in-depth qualitative interviews with community site representativeAt 8 months and 12 monthsTo evaluate feasibility and acceptability of CAB and RPV LA by community site representatives
Proportion of injections occurring within target window from target date (± 7 days of target date)12 monthsTo describe adherence to dosing window by clinicians
Proportion of injections occurring after target window with/without use of oral ART12 monthsTo describe adherence to dosing window by clinicians
Incidence and extent of oral bridging use12 monthsTo describe adherence to dosing window by clinicians
Qualitative interviews with nurses to ascertain the utility of the Blueprints by Community Nurse or Clinic Nurse12 monthsTo evaluate the utility of the Blueprints by Community Nurse or Clinic Nurse

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants who do not progress to injections/discontinuation during oral lead in12 monthsTo describe safety of CAB and RPV LA
Proportion of participants who discontinue CAB and RPV LA, for all cause, virological reasons or tolerability12 monthsTo describe safety of CAB and RPV LA
Proportion of participants who are virologically suppressed (plasma HIV-1 RNA VL<50 c/mL) at month 4 and 12 (with +/- 6-week window)12 monthsTo describe effectiveness of CAB and RPV LA
Proportion participants with VL ≥ 50 c/mL at M4 and M12 (with a +/- 6-week window12 monthsTo describe effectiveness of CAB and RPV LA
Incidence of CAB and RPV LA related ADRs (adverse drug reactions) and all SAEs12 monthsTo describe safety of CAB and RPV LA

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026