Skip to content

Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy-guided Selective Lumbar Nerve Root Injection

Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy-guided Selective Lumbar Nerve Root Injection for Treatment of Radicular Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05290779
Enrollment
74
Registered
2022-03-22
Start date
2021-04-06
Completion date
2022-05-16
Last updated
2022-09-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Radiculopathy

Keywords

lumbar radicular pain, selective nerve root injection, ultrasound selective lumbar nerve root injection

Brief summary

The study is conducted to compare pain relief, accuracy and safety and radiation exposure of selective lumbar nerve root injection for lumbar radicular pain using ultrasound guidance versus fluoroscopy guidance

Detailed description

Radicular pain is believed to be induced by irritation or inflammation of a nerve root caused by mechanical pressure or chemical irritation from degeneration herniation or rupture of intervertebral disc .Nerve root steroid injection is the most commonly performed minimally invasive technique for treatment of radicular pain in lumbar spine.The mechanism of action of steroids is to reduce inflammation by reduction in proinflammatory mediators around the nerve root, causing reduction in pain levels . Although Fluoroscopy guided technique is the most widely accepted method in lumbar selective nerve root injection, but recently ultrasound technique has gained acceptance among physicians due its reliability, efficacy, real-time guidance of injection and reduction of radiation exposure. Real-time guidance of injection provided by ultrasonography allows for good identification of the spinous process and adjacent structures such as lamina, zygapophyseal articulations and transverse process allowing for safer and potentially equally effective injection technique. The patients are randomly allocated into two groups; one group will receive injection under fluoroscopy guidance and the other group will receive injection under ultrasound guidance. The two groups are compared in terms of pain relief, accuracy and safety and radiation exposure.

Interventions

PROCEDUREselective lumbar nerve root injection

selective lumbar nerve root steroid injection for treatment of radicular pain.

Sponsors

Minia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients aged 18-60 years . * Both sexes . * With unilateral chronic lumbar radicular pain for more than 3 months. * Cooperative and oriented patients. * All patients are diagnosed by a neurologist for radicular low back pain through clinical presentation, medical examinations, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Exclusion criteria

* Uncontrolled diabetes. * Infection at the site of injection. * Spine fractures. * Previous back surgery. * Progressive neurologic disorders. * Fever. * Peripheral neuropathy. * Presence of motor or sphencteric disturbance. * Bilateral radicular pain. * Allergy to substance of injection. * Patients with body mass index (BMI) more than 35.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
improvement of visual analogue score of pain3 monthsevaluation of pain relief using visual analogue score on a scale from 0 to 10 with higher scores mean worse outcome
improvement of Oswestry disability index score for back pain3 monthsevaluation of pain relief using Oswestry disability index score on a scale from 0% to 100% with the higher scores mean worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
safety of technique3 monthscomparing rate of complications
radiation exposure1 hourtime of x-ray radiation exposure during procedure.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026