Prosthesis Durability
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of this study will be the evaluation of patient satisfaction and oral health-related-quality of life (OHRQoL) of two versus four implants supporting fixed full-arch screw-retained metal acrylic hybrid mandibular prosthesis.
Detailed description
* Six completely edentulous patients will be selected for this study from the outpatient clinic of the prosthodontic department * All patients will be informed about all surgical and prosthodontics procedures that will be done for them. All patients will sign the consent form of the ethical committee in faculty dentistry Mansoura University. The patients will be divided into 2 groups 1. Control group: will receive implant-supported mandibular fixed metal acrylic prosthesis on 4 implants that were placed according to the All on four concept. 2. Study group: will receive implant-supported mandibular fixed metal acrylic prosthesis on two implants placed according to All On two concept.
Interventions
PROCEDUREplacement of four dental implants
placement of four dental implants according to the All on four concept
PROCEDUREplacement of two dental implants
placement of two dental implants according to All on two concepts
DEVICEmandibular full arch prosthesis
loading of the mandibular fixed full-arch screw-retained metal acrylic prosthesis
Sponsors
Mansoura University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* • Eligible patients needed must have Sufficient interarch space (at least 15 mm from the occlusal plane to the mandibular ridge) to provide space for fixed prosthesis construction all patients should be completely edentulous patients with resorbed mandibular ridge all patients must be angle class I
Exclusion criteria
* systemic diseases that contraindicate implant placement bone metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus irradiation of the head and neck region chemotherapy within the past 3 years smoking habits.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaire | one year | Regarding VAS, participants were asked to score their answer according to the amount of satisfaction on a 100mm line (Score zero = no satisfaction at all and score 100 = complete satisfaction). The questions cover several items related to prosthesis such as: retention, stability, comfort, ease of cleaning, ease of speaking, ease of chewing, limited activities due to embarrassment, quality of bolus and appearance |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Life (Secondary Outcome). | one year | The oral Health impact profile (OHIP-14) questions were utilized to assess OHRQoL. The questions were composed of seven domains |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed