Skip to content

Respiratory Functions and Muscle Strength, Trunk Control, Functional Capacity and Independence in Hemiplegic Patients

The Relationship of Respiratory Functions and Respiratory Muscle Strength With Trunk Control, Functional Capacity and Functional Independence in Hemiplegic Patients After Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05290649
Enrollment
25
Registered
2022-03-22
Start date
2019-11-10
Completion date
2020-04-06
Last updated
2025-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

stroke, hemiplegia, respiratory function, respiratory muscle strength, trunk control

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to invastigate the relationship between respiratory functions and respiratory muscle strength with trunk control, functional capacity and functional independence in hemiplegic patients after stroke. In our study, 25 hemiplegic patients were included on a voluntary basis. Pulmonary function test (PFT) for respiratory functions, mouth pressure measurement (MIP: maximal ınspiratory pressure, MEP: maximal expiratory pressure) for respiratory muscle strenght. Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) for trunk control, and Time Up and Go Test (TUG) for functional capacity and Barthel Index (BI) for functional independence assessment were used.

Detailed description

Stroke is a clinical picture where motor loss, emotional and balance disororder, speech and cognitive functions are seen as a obstruction or rupture of cerebral vessels. %10 of patients with stroke recover spontaneously within the first month: the other %10 do not respond treatment. %80 of patients need rehabilitation. The purpose of stroke rehabilitation is to provide individuals with the functional capacity and functional indepence they need in the shortest time. The aim of this study was to invastigate the relationship between respiratory functions and respiratory muscle strength with trunk control, functional capacity and functional independence in hemiplegic patients after stroke. In our study, 25 hemiplegic patients were included on a voluntary basis. Pulmonary function test (PFT) for respiratory functions, mouth pressure measurement (MIP: maximal ınspiratory pressure, MEP: maximal expiratory pressure) for respiratory muscle strenght. Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) for trunk control, and Time Up and Go Test (TUG) for functional capacity and Barthel Index (BI) for functional independence assessment were used.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTclinical assessment

mini mental test, pulmonary function test, respiratory muscle strength test, trunk impairment scale, timed up and go test, barthel index

Sponsors

Halic University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of ischemic stroke * over age 40 years * Brunnstrom stage 3-6.

Exclusion criteria

* having an additional clinical problem affecting lung functions, * Mini-mental test score below 24, * having another cardiovascular disease except stroke.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trunk Impairment Scaleat the enrollmentTrunk control was assessed with Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) that was developed to evaluate trunk control in patients with neurological problems consists of 17 parameters. The parameters are scored between 0 and 3 in the scale in which static and dynamic sitting balance and trunk coordination are evaluated. The best performance value was recorded after three repeated measurements in patients who could maintain their starting position
Timed Up and Go Testat the enrollmentFunctional capacity of subjects were evaluated with Time Up and Go Test (TUG). TUG is widely used to evaluate functional capacity in stroke patients. Test procedure was given to the patients before the test. During the test, the subject was asked to stand up from the chair, walk 3 meters forward, turn 180 degrees where they were, walk back to the chair and sit on the chair again. Test time was measured with a stopwatch and recorded. Subjects performed the test three times with intervals and the best result was recorded
Barthel Indexat the enrollmentFunctional independence was evaluated with Barthel Index (BI) which is one of the most frequently used scales for determining and tracking functional independence. It basically evaluates mobility and self-care activities. The test consists of 10 sections: nutrition, transfer, self-care, toilet use, bathroom, movement, use of wheelchairs (if using), climbing up and down stairs, dressing, bowel and bladder control (26, 27). The total score is evaluated between 0-100; 0-20 points: fully dependent, 21-61 points: highly dependent, 62-90 points: moderately dependent, 91-99 points: slightly dependent, 100 points: fully independent
FEV1 (liter)at the enrollmentThis is the amount of air with pulmonary function test that the patient can force out of their lungs in one second.
FEV1 (%-percentage)at the enrollmentThis is the percentage of air with pulmonary function test that the patient can force out of their lungs in one second.
FVC (liter)at the enrollmentThis is the greatest total amount of air patient can forcefully breathe out after breathing in as deeply as possible.
FVC (%-percentage)at the enrollmentThis is the percentage of total amount of air patient can forcefully breathe out after breathing in as deeply as possible.
FEV1/FVC (percentage)at the enrollmentThe FEV1/FVC ratio is a number that represents the percentage of patient lung capacity patient is able to exhale in one second.
Inspiratory muscle testat the enrollmentMaximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) is going to measured using a mouth pressure meter (MicroRPM; MicroMedical, UK) according to the guideline of ATS and European Respiratory Society (ERS).
Expiratory muscle testat the enrollmentMaximal expiratory pressure (MEP) is going to measured using a mouth pressure meter (MicroRPM; MicroMedical, UK) according to the guideline of ATS and European Respiratory Society (ERS).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026