Vertical Alveolar Bone Loss
Conditions
Brief summary
This study was conducted to clinically and radiographically evaluate locator RTx attachments for two implant-supported mandibular overdenture using two loading protocols
Detailed description
Thirty edentulous patients received two implants in the interformaninal region in the canine area . According to the loading protocol used for attaching mandibular overdenture, patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups. Group I (control): patients who would be delivered mandibular implant overdenture retained by two RTx locator attachments using conventional loading protocol. Group II (study): patients who would be delivered mandibular overdenture retained by two RTx locator attachments using early loading protocol. Peri-implant tissue health \[Plaque (PL) and (GI) gingival scores, pocket depth (PD), and crestal bone loss (CBL)\] were evaluated immediately after denture insertion (T0), 6 (T6), and 12 (T12) months after insertion.
Interventions
PROCEDUREsurgical placement of long dental implants
Two interforaminal implants were placed in the canine region
DEVICEoverdenture supported by RTX attachment system
Control group: Implants were loaded after three months by RTX supported overdenture study group: Implants were loaded after four weeks by RTX supported overdenture
Sponsors
Mansoura University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The selected patients were stratified according to age, gender, years of mandibular edentulism, number of old non-satisfactory dentures (baseline criteria, table 1). Patients were assigned to one of 2 groups using a balanced randomization procedure to ensure comparability between groups regarding baseline characters;
Intervention model description
Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups. Group I (control): patients who would be delivered mandibular implant overdenture retained by two RTX locator attachments using conventional loading protocol. Group II (study): patients who would be delivered mandibular overdenture retained by two RTx locator attachments using early loading protocol.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* adequate bone quantity \[class III -V according to Cawood and Howell in the interforaminal area of the mandible to receive 2 implants (4×13 mm) * adequate restorative space \[12-15 mm from the mucosa of the mandibular ridge to the occlusal plane, Class I according to Ahuja and Cagna for RTX supported implant overdenture.
Exclusion criteria
* systemic diseases that contraindicate implant placement * bone metabolic diseases as diabetes mellitus * irradiation of the head and neck region * chemotherapy within the past 3 years * smoking habits.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| gingival index | one year | evaluation of gingival bleeding around RTX attachments using scores.0; no bleeding when a periodontal probe is passed along the mucosal margin, 1;isolated bleeding spots visible, 2; blood forms a confluent red line on the mucosal margin, 3;heavy or profuse bleeding. |
| pocket depth | one year | evaluation of pocket depth in mm around RTX attachments |
| Marginal bone loss | one year | evaluations of crestal bone loss in mm around implants by digital periapical radiography |
| plaque score | one year | evaluation of plaque accumulation around RTX attachments using scores.score 0; absence plaque , score 1; plaque only detected by a probe passing through the smooth marginal surface of the implant, score 2; plaque can be recognized by naked eye, and score 3; plenty of soft matter. |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed