Skip to content

Efficacy of the Use of Diaries in Intensive Care Units

Efficacy of the Use of Diaries in Intensive Care Units

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05288140
Acronym
QUADERN
Enrollment
240
Registered
2022-03-21
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2024-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety, Depression, Diary (Blank Journal), Family, Intensive Care Unit, Patient, PICS, Quality of Life, Stress

Brief summary

Randomized clinical trial that aims to evaluate the impact of the use of a diary in patients and relatives of patients admitted to an ICU in relation to usual practice in terms of health-related quality of life, the post-traumatic stress and anxiety/depression at 2, 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge.

Detailed description

Randomized, parallel, open, non-blinded, multicenter clinical trial, with an experimental group (diary) and a control group (usual practice), to compare the effect produced on quality of life by post-traumatic stress and anxiety/depression of patients and relatives, whether or not they have access to a diary during the stay in the unit. Three validated scales will be used at three different times. 120 cases per group, carrying out a preliminary pilot test. Data analysis according to IBM SPSS v.24 to describe and compare both groups.

Interventions

OTHERuse of diary

a diary is made for the experimental group where the events and events during the period of sedation and intubation are explained

Sponsors

University of Barcelona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Intervention model description

A control group and an experimental group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* admitted intensive care unit * sedated and mechanically ventilated for 24hours * signed consent * not language barrier * willingness to attend follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

* verbal manifestation of psychiatric, mental or cognitive antecedents * who do not coluntarily agree to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)2 monthsquestionnaries, range of 0-21 for either anxiety and depression subscores. Higher scores corresponding to worse outcomes. 0-7 normal; 8-10 borderline abnormal; 11-21 sever symptoms of anxiety or depressin.
SF-36 Health Survey2 monthsquestionnaries to measure quality of life. 36 items. from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best health
Revised Impact of Event Scales (IES-R)2 monthsquestionnaries; measuring areas of hyperarousal, avoidance, and intrusion as subscales. Total score ranges from 0-88, higher score associated with worse PTSD symptoms. 1-22 mild PTSD,;22 signal clinically significant PTSD symptoms.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactPilar Muñoz Rey
mpmunozr.germanstrias@gencat.cat639534904

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026