Skip to content

Efficacy of Collagen Sponge on Palatal Wound Healing

Efficacy of Collagen Sponge on Palatal Wound Healing: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05287763
Enrollment
32
Registered
2022-03-18
Start date
2022-04-30
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2024-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession, Inadequately Attached Gingiva

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of collagen sponge and gelatin sponge on the palatal wound healing and postoperative pain following gingival graft harvesting.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of collagen sponge and gelatin sponge on the palatal wound healing and postoperative pain following gingival graft harvesting. The included patients will be randomized into two groups. The patients in control group will be treated with gelatin sponge and those in the test group will be treated with collagen sponge. The postoperative pain will be assessed by VAS scale at day 1, 3 and 7 after surgery. Epithelialization of the palatal wound will be evaluated by hydrogen peroxide test and digital photography at 1 week postoperatively. Additionally, postoperative pain, consumption of analgesics, willingness to repeat the treatment and the existence of delayed bleeding will be recorded at 1 week. At 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 1 month after surgery, epithelialization of the palatal wound and aesthetic scores will be evaluated.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPalatal soft tissue graft harvesting

After local anaesthesia, a horizontal incision 2 mm apically from the gingival margin will be carried out using a #15C blade. The standardized rectangular graft with a thickness of 1.5 mm will be harvested from distal aspect of canine till first molar. The graft will be lifted and separated using tissue forceps and a blade till it is free from all sides.

Sponsors

The Dental Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years 2. Clinical indications utilizing free gingival grafts or de-epithelialized gingival grafts to treat either insufficient keratinized tissue or gingival recession defects 3. Full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score lower than 20%

Exclusion criteria

1. Smoking 2. Pregnancy or lactation 3. Untreated periodontal disease 4. Severe systemic conditions that contraindicate surgery (diabetes, heart disease, cancer etc.) 5. Presence of coagulation disorders (history of Haemophilia, von Wille-brand disease, or anticoagulant therapy) 6. Taking medications affecting periodontal health or healing 7. Previous surgery for a palate graft harvested from the experimental sites

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
epithelialization of the palatal wound evaluated by hydrogen peroxide testat 1 weekThe appearance of bubbles means the wound is not completely epithelialized. The result will be recorded as a dichotomous variable (yes/no).
epithelialization of the palatal wound evaluated by digital photographyat 1 weekThe epithelialization of the palatal wound will be recorded as yes or no according to inspectional evaluation of surface characteristics and reflection as well as clarity and distinctness of wound outline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
willingness to repeat the treatmentat 1 weekusing a VAS ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = strong unwilling and 10 = strong willing)
postoperative painat day 1using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable)
aesthetic scoreat 3 weeksassessed by judging on the color, contour, and texture of the donor sites. The total score will vary between 0 and 6 by scoring each subject from 0 to 2 (0=inharmonious with adjacent tissue, 1=moderately harmonious with adjacent tissue and 2=very harmonious with adjacent tissue).
the existence of delayed bleedingat 1 weekthe occurrence of prolonged hemorrhaging during the first week
consumption of analgesicsat 1 weekto answer the following question: Did you take any analgesics due to the palatal pain since the procedure was completed?

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactWeida Li, master
kyb@zjkq.com.cn0571-87219287

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026