Skip to content

Buccal Cortical Separation and Lateralization for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation

Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Autogenous Versus Xenogenic Horizontal Ridge Augmentation After Mandibular Ridge-split with Buccal Cortical Lateralization: a Randomizedcontrolled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05286541
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-03-18
Start date
2023-10-10
Completion date
2024-10-20
Last updated
2024-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Horizontal Ridge Deficiency

Brief summary

Cases with horizontal ridge deficiency less than what is possible for ridge splitting were recruited and the buccal cortex was totally separated and lateralized at the desired distance for augmentation

Interventions

PROCEDURELateralized buccal cortex with xenograft

the buccal cortex of the deficient ridge was separated and lateralized then fixed at the desired distance

PROCEDURELateralized buccal cortex with autogenous particulate

lateralized buccal cortex with autogenous particulate

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* suffering only from posterior mandibular horizontal ridge deficiency and with adequate inter-arch space to accommodate the future restoration

Exclusion criteria

* Heavy smokers, diabetics, patients with bleeding problems, liver and kidney diseases, bone diseases that can affect bone healing, previous history of any ridge augmentation procedure in the posterior mandible, and those undergoing or planned for radiotherapy or chemotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in horizontal bone gainsix months after the operationthe net average bone gain (in millimeters) was calculated: by calculating the difference between the immediate post operative bone width measured on the Immediate CBCT and the six months bone width measured on the six months CBCT

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone area percentSix months after the operationhistomorphometric analysis of core biopsies was done at the time of implant insertion to determine the bone area percent at the implant sites

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026