Skip to content

Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Oblique Subcostal Transverses Abdominis Plane Block

Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Oblique Subcostal Transverses Abdominis Plane Block for Controlling Postoperative Pain After Umbilical Hernia Repair

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05286125
Enrollment
52
Registered
2022-03-18
Start date
2021-01-15
Completion date
2023-12-15
Last updated
2023-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pain

Brief summary

Comparing the impact of bilateral erector spinae plane block and transverse abdominis plane block on improving quality of pain management after umbilical hernia repair.

Detailed description

Postoperative pain is an important problem after umbilical hernia repair which has negative effects on patient's hemodynamics and cause delayed ambulation resulting in prolonged duration of hospital stay and poor patient satisfaction. Multiple analgesic strategies have been proposed including Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, epidural analgesia. Each of them has its limitations. Ultra¬sound guided regional anesthesia techniques for abdominal wall can be effective components of multimodal postoperative analgesia with limited side-effects Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a promising para-spinal bock that can achieve both visceral and somatic abdominal analgesia if the injection was performed at a lower thoracic level. Transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block which is considered a peripheral nerve block that is aimed at anesthetizing nerves supplying the anterior abdominal wall. We will compare between erector spinae plane block and transverse abdominis plane block for controlling postoperative pain after umbilical hernia repair. Patients will be allocated randomly into two equal groups by a computer-generated randomization table Group (E) (n=26): Patients will receive erector spinae plane (ESP) block after completion of surgery. Group (T) (n= 26): Patients will receive oblique subcostal transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block after completion of surgery

Interventions

Using the in plane technique, the needle will be advanced between the transverse process and erector spinae muscle. The correct location will be confirmed using 1ml of Local Anesthetic (LA) to view hydrodissection(12). 19ml of LA will be injected between the muscle and transverse process.

PROCEDUREoblique subcostal transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block

An echogenic needle will be inserted in-plane until the needle tip reaches the fascia between the rectus abdominis and the transverse abdominis muscles. Once the needle enters the TAP plane, a dynamic injection can be performed by advancing the needle under ultrasound guidance laterally in the pocket created by the initial injection of 5 - 10 mL of local anesthetic; as the needle is advanced, the remaining local anesthetic will be injected. This allows for a more lateral spread of the local anesthetic

Sponsors

Zagazig University
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled for elective umbilical hernia repair. * Patient acceptance. * Both sex * Patient's age 21 - 60 years. * Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II. * BMI 25 - 30 kg m-2.

Exclusion criteria

* Uncooperative patients and patients with psychological problems. * Patients with liver or renal impairment. * Patients with contraindication to regional anesthesia. * Patients with history of allergy to drug used in the study. * Patients with chronic pain.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative analgesic requirements24 hours postoperativemeasuring the total doses of analgesic required to relieve the pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pain severity using Verbal Rating Scale24 hours postoperativeassessing pain severity using Verbal Rating Scale (mild, moderate and severe)
Postoperative pain severity using Numeric Rating Scale24 hours postoperativeassessing pain severity using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10; 0, no pain; 10, worst pain)
Postoperative heart rate changes24 hours postoperativemonitoring postoperative changes in the heart rate (HR) measured by beat per minute (BPM) and comparing it with the preoperative measures
Postoperative pain severity using Visual Analogue scale24 hours postoperativeassessing pain severity using Visual Analogue scale (VAS) (0-100mm)
Incidence of postoperative side effects24 hours postoperativerecording any postoperative complications as nausea and vomiting
Duration of postoperative hospital stay24 hours postoperativemeasuring the delay in discharging the patients postoperative because of the pain
Postoperative blood pressure changes24 hours postoperativemonitoring postoperative changes in the blood pressure (BP) measured by mm Hg and comparing it with the preoperative measures.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactmichael A shaker, lecturer
michaeladelshaker@gamil.com01096457282
Backup Contactsalwa s ElSherbeny, lecturer
01128595629

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026