Family Members
Conditions
Keywords
Black/African American, Early Psychosis, Access and Engagement
Brief summary
Building upon formative research, this mixed methods study will be conducted in three phases to develop, refine, and pilot-test a multi-component Family Peer Navigator model designed to increase access to and initial engagement in coordinated specialty care for early psychosis among Black/African American families.
Detailed description
The overall goal of this mixed methods study will be conducted in three phases to develop, refine, and pilot-test a multi-component Family Peer Navigator model designed to increase access to and engagement in coordinated specialty care programs among Black/African American families. Phase II will recruit 10 family member participants to complete a four-month open trial to refine the Family Peer Navigator model. During Phase III, a total of 40 Black/African American families will be recruited to participate in a randomized pilot trial of the Family Peer Navigator model against a low-intensive care coordination in two coordinated specialty care programs to assess acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary impact.
Interventions
The Family Peer Navigator model is theoretical underpinning by the Social-Ecological Model and the Social Cognitive Theory, that incorporates a mixture of evidence- and research-based strategies, to include three key components: 1) Introduction and Assessment; 2) Individual Psychoeducation; 3) Six Brief Check-In
active control, treatment as usual including services provided by the coordinated specialty care program for first-episode psychosis.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. ≥ 18 years of age 2. Identifies as Black/African American 3. Loved one who meets criteria for risk of psychosis with a total score of ≥ 3 on the Prodromal Questionnaire- Brief Version
Exclusion criteria
1. Family members who cannot understand the consent process 2. Non-English speaking adults 3. Black/African American families referred to coordinated specialty care and who have already been determined eligible for services by providers.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8) | Months 1 through 3 of treatment period; repeated measure to assess change in acceptability through study completion, average of 4 months | Self-report measure to assess acceptability, a brief measure for family member participant. Items are scored from 1 to 4. Possible total scores range from 8 to 32, with higher scores (\>23) indicating greater satisfaction. |
| Youth Services Survey-Families (YSS-F) | Baseline and Month 3 of treatment period; repeated measure to assess change in acceptability through study completion, average of 4 months | Self-report measure to assess acceptability in the following domains: appropriateness, participation, cultural sensitivity, social connectedness, and outcomes. Items in a domain are summed and divided by the total number of items, and scores greater than 3.5 are reported in the positive range for the domain. |
| Number of Referrals (Recruitment) to assess feasibility | Baseline through study completion; repeated measure to assess change in feasibility through study completion, average of 4 months | The number of family member participants recruited and referrals received categorized by where they originated. |
| Level of Engagement to measure feasibility | Baseline through study completion; repeated measure to assess change in feasibility through study completion, average of 4 months | Total number of sessions attended, the number of contact hours with families and by which method (videoconference, in person, text, email etc.) and the number of completed measures. |
| Rate of Retention to measure feasibility | Baseline through study completion; repeated measure to assess change in feasibility through study completion, average of 4 months | The percentage of families that drop out (family declined or missed 3 consecutive appointments). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| General Self-Efficacy scale | Baseline through study completion; repeated measure to assess change through study completion, average of 4 months | A self report measure of self-efficacy correlated to emotion, optimism and work satisfaction. Scores range from 10 to 40 with higher scores indicating more self-efficacy. |
| Youth Services Survey for Families - Social Connectedness Subscale | Baseline through study completion; repeated measure to assess change through study completion, average of 4 months | Social connectedness will be measured using four questions (e.g., "I know people who will listen and understand me when I need to talk") from the YSS-F. Scores range from 4 to 20, higher scores indicating greater social connectedness. |
| Culturally-adapted Knowledge about Psychosis questionnaire (CaKAP) | Baseline through study completion; repeated measure to assess change through study completion, average of 4 months | Self-reported measure that includes 23 culturally specific items across five subscales: symptoms and problems relating to psychosis; cause; other treatments and services; course and outcome; and management. Total scores range from 0 through 104 where higher scores indicate greater knowledge. |
| Youth Services Survey for Families - Cultural Sensitivity Subscale | Baseline through study completion; repeated measure to assess change through study completion, average of 4 months | — |
| Scale to Assess Therapeutic Relationships in Community Mental Health Care (STAR) | Baseline through study completion; repeated measure to assess change through study completion, average of 4 months | Measure includes 12-items to assess therapeutic relationships. |
Countries
United States