Skip to content

Open to Laparoscopic Reverse Conversion of Perforated Appendicitis

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Reverse Conversion (Open to Laparoscopic) in Management of Acute Perforated Appendicitis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05283733
Acronym
reverse
Enrollment
426
Registered
2022-03-17
Start date
2018-01-18
Completion date
2021-12-25
Last updated
2022-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abdominal Abscess, Acute Appendicitis With Rupture, Laparoscopic Surgery, Sepsis

Keywords

laparoscopic, appendectomy, reverse conversion, reoperation, intraabdominal abscesses

Brief summary

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Reverse Conversion (Open to Laparoscopic) in management of Acute Perforated Appendicitis

Detailed description

Introduction: Acute appendicitis (AA), a frequent intra-abdominal surgical pathology, necessitates a thorough awareness of its symptoms, examination, diagnosis, and total surgical management. The surgical approach to AA is appendectomy; nevertheless, the medical literature continues to argue the merits of open vs laparoscopic surgery. As with other laparoscopic surgical techniques, the literature reports lower discomfort, earlier resumption of oral feeding and shorter hospital stay following laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) as compared to open appendectomy (OA). Additionally, laparoscopy has some drawbacks such as greater cost and lengthier operating durations as compared to open surgery. The goal of this clinical study: was to compare open appendectomy versus laparoscopic conversion from open (reverse conversion) for the treatment of acute perforated appendicitis in our setting. Patients and procedures: 426 patients had perforated appendectomy and divided between two groups: group A (interventional) 213 patients who were subjected to the reverse conversion technique and group B (control)213 patients who were operated by the open technique. The key end goals for comparing both groups were the rates of intraabdominal abscess, rates of wound infection, rates of ileus and rates of reoperation. The hospital length of stay and the operative time were used as secondary end goals for comparison.

Interventions

PROCEDUREreverse conversion technique

converting open appendectomy to laparoscopic technique for proper control of intraabdominal sepsis

Sponsors

Zagazig University
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* symptoms consistent with acute perforated appendicitis, * had ultrasound or computed tomography (CT) evidence of acute perforated appendicitis, * ages ranging from 16 to 65 years.

Exclusion criteria

* radiological evidence of appendicular mass, * septic shock or multi-organ failure (MOF) at presentation, * Diabetes Mellitus (DM), renal failure, morbid obesity * recent (6-month) history of thromboembolic disease * immunomodulators, * a history of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), * postoperative pathological report of the removed appendix revealed carcinoid or Crohn's disease, * American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification more than II.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the rates of intraabdominal abscess3 months post operativerates of complications
rates of wound infection3 months post operativerates of complications
rates of ileusBaseline (Hospital admission)
rates of reoperation3 months post operative

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The hospital length of stayup to 3 monthsthe length of hospital stay
the operative timeIntraoperativeTime of performing the procedures

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026