Gingival Pigmentation
Conditions
Brief summary
The objectives of the present study are to: 1. Evaluate the effect of I-PRF injection following laser gingival depigmentation technique on the healing period as a primary objective. 2. Assess patient satisfaction following the procedure in terms of pain and esthetic outcome as a secondary objective.
Detailed description
Dental esthetic needs are increasing in recent years with a greater demand on pleasant appearance; including a healthy set of dentitions but also esthetically improved gingival appearance, especially when it is located in the anterior labial region. Physiologic gingival hyperpigmentation affects numerous people of different ethnic backgrounds. Gingival depigmentation is defined as a periodontal plastic surgical procedure that are aimed at removing the pigmented gingiva and methods aimed at masking the pigmented gingiva. Techniques of gingival depigmentation can be classified as; chemical methods mainly by ascorbic acids, surgical methods, electrosurgery, cryosurgery, radiosurgery, and lasers. The study was conducted on eight patients seeking treatment for their gingival hyperpigmentation for esthetic reasons. A total number of 16 sites of facial gingival hyperpigmentation were treated, two in each patient in a split mouth technique. * Group I (LASER with I-PRF): Included eight sites that were treated with laser technique for gingival depigmentation, followed by intramucosal field injection of I-PRF (as study group). * Group II (LASER): Included eight sites that were treated with laser technique for gingival depigmentation (as a control group). The clinical outcomes were assessed for each patient: at baseline (pre-operative), post-operative, one week, one month. Clinical assessment was done by measuring DOPI, clinical wound healing, VAS and patient satisfaction questionnaire.
Interventions
BIOLOGICALi-PRF
* Local anesthesia was achieved using field block technique. * A soft tissue diode surgical laser unit was used in a contact method using a flexible fiber optic hand piece with initiated tip. * Laser irradiation parameters were adjusted as follows: Wavelength \[940 ± 10 nm\], irradiation mode \[contact continuous wave\], Power \[2 W\] and 300 μm fiber tip diameter (Jokar et al., 2019). * The treatment was depigmentation by laser thin injection by I-PRF Post-operative instructions Instruct the patients to avoid tooth brushing on the day of surgical treatment to prevent mechanical trauma and allow re-epithelialization.
PROCEDUREDiode Laser
Local anesthesia was achieved using field block technique. * A soft tissue diode surgical laser unit was used in a contact method using a flexible fiber optic hand piece with initiated tip. * Laser irradiation parameters were adjusted as follows: Wavelength \[940 ± 10 nm\], irradiation mode \[contact continuous wave\], Power \[2 W\] and 300 μm fiber tip diameter (Jokar et al., 2019). Post-operative instructions Instruct the patients to avoid tooth brushing on the day of surgical treatment to prevent mechanical trauma and allow re-epithelialization.
Sponsors
Ain Shams University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Male and female with age range from 16 to 45 years old. * Systemically free from any disease as evidenced by the health questionnaire guided by modified Cornell medical index (Pendleton et al., 2004). * Gingival hyperpigmentation on maxillary and mandibular labial keratinized gingiva score 3 (Dummett et al., 1964). * Patient with thick gingival phenotype (\>1.5mm) (Claffey and Shanley, 1986).
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant and lactating women. * Smokers. * Gingival pigmentation associated with occupational Hazards. * Patients with missing anterior teeth. * Patients with any metallic restoration related to anterior teeth or undergoing orthodontic treatment. * Vulnerable groups (prisoners, handicapped and orphans).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Dummet oral pigmentation index | 1 month | the degree of gingival pigmentation will be scored as: 0 = pink tissue \[no clinical pigmentation\]; 1 = mild light brown tissue \[mild clinical pigmentation\]; 2 = medium brown or mixed brown and pink tissue \[moderate clinical pigmentation\]; or 3 = deep brown/ blue-black tissue \[heavy clinical pigmentation\] |
| Clinical wound healing | 1 week | scored as follows: 1\) Complete reepithelialization, 2) Incomplete reepithelialization, 3) ulcer and 4) tissue defect or necrosis |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction questionnaire | 1month | score the degree of satisfaction about cosmetic outcomes of treatment |
| Visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain assessment | 1month | Pain assessment will be performed using a 10-cm (100 mm) horizontal continuous scale marked no pain on the left and maximum pain on the right side of the scale. The scores were as follows: no pain (0), slight pain (0.1-3.0 mm), moderate pain (3.1-6.0 mm), and severe pain (6.1-10 mm) |
| Histological assessment | 1 week | The mean of epithelial thickness for each case was calculated |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed