Skip to content

Anti-HLA Immunization And Immunosuppressive Therapy Management In Kidney Transplant Patients Returning to Dialysis

Evolution of Anti-HLA Immunization According to Immunosuppressive Therapy Management Modalities in Kidney Transplant Patients Returning to Dialysis in Lorraine Between January 2007 and December 2019

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05282875
Enrollment
430
Registered
2022-03-16
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2022-09-01
Last updated
2022-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dialysis, HLA Sensitization, Immunosuppressive Agents, Kidney Transplantation

Keywords

immunosuppressive agents, graft loss, HLA antibodies, retransplantation, kidney transplantation

Brief summary

This study is an analytical observational retrospective cohort study. It is a single-center study conducted in the Nancy University Hospital. End stage renal disease is the ultimate stage of the chronic kidney disease. Patients need extra-renal replacement techniques. Kidney transplantation is the most effective option for survival, quality of life and costs. Then long-term immunosuppressive agents are required to prevent allograft rejection and improve graft survival. The number of patients who return in dialysis after graft loss is increasing and accounts for 10% of incident dialysis patients and 14% of patients on the kidney transplant waiting list registered in 2019. This population may develop complications induced by end-stage renal disease and adverse events related to prolonged exposure to immunosuppressive agents. There are currently no formal guidelines on the management of immunosuppressive agents when patients return to dialysis. Reduction or discontinuation of therapy appears to decrease cardiovascular, infectious, and neoplastic complications. However, continuing these treatments may limit anti-HLA sensitization which may access to retransplantation. Only a few low-powered cohort studies have evaluated the impact of the management of immunosuppressive therapy on the HLA-sensitization. The hypothesis of our study is that the continuation of immunosuppressive agents when patients return in dialysis may limit anti-HLA sensitization. Therefore, access to retransplantation could be facilitated. The main objective is to compare the evolution of anti-HLA sensitization according to the management of immunosuppressive treatment after the return in dialysis (maintenance, reduction, cessation). Secondary objectives are time to re-transplantation for patients on the transplant waiting list, survival of the new graft, patient survival, and dialysis complications (cardiovascular, infectious and neoplastic complications).

Detailed description

Cohort constitution : The cohort of patients returning to dialysis after graft loss is extracted from the REIN (Réseau Epidémiologique et Information en Néphrologie) Lorraine registry, which follow all patients in end-stage renal failure under replacement therapy in the Lorraine region since 2001. Patients returning to dialysis after graft loss between 1st January 2007 and 31st December 2019 are extracted from the register and included. From this cohort, 3 groups were created according to the management of their immunosuppressive therapy : maintenance, reduction, and discontinuation. The immunological data of the patients are recovered from the HLA laboratory of the Nancy University Hospital.

Interventions

DRUGmanagement of immunosuppressive therapy

3 groups : * Discontinuation of immunosuppressive agents * Reduction of immunosuppressive agents * Maintenance of immunosuppressive agents

Sponsors

Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL

Inclusion criteria

* Patients included in the Lorraine regional REIN registry over the period 2007-2019, * Returning in dialysis after a kidney transplantation, with a living or deceased donor. * On haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. * Registered or not on the waiting-list for retransplantation

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with graft dysfunction receiving a pre-emptive retransplantation * Absence of serum tested for anti-HLA (human leukocyte antigen) antibodies after the return to dialysis. * No information on immunosuppressive agents

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of the evolution of anti-human leucocyte antigen sensitization according to the management of immunosuppressive therapybaseline = return in dialysis, t1=6 months after return in dialysisEvolution of the panel reactive antibody evolution 6 months after the return in dialysis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients survivalbaseline = return in dialysis, end of follow up = death or last follow-up or 31 december 2020Patient survival after return in dialysis
New transplantationbaseline = return in dialysis, end of follow up = death or last follow-up or 31 december 2020Retransplantation after return in dialysis
Graft Survival after retransplantationbaseline = return in dialysis, end of follow up = death or last follow-up or 31 december 2020Graft Survival after retransplantation
Incidence of infectious, neoplastic and cardiovascular eventsbaseline = return in dialysis, end of follow up = 1 year after return in dialysisIncidence of infection, neoplastic and cardiovascular events after return in dialysis

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026