Skip to content

Ergogenic Properties of Magnesium Supplementation

Ergogenic Properties of Magnesium Supplementation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05282693
Enrollment
41
Registered
2022-03-16
Start date
2021-12-17
Completion date
2024-02-28
Last updated
2024-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Exercise Performance, Gut -Microbiota, Mitochondrial Function

Brief summary

The purpose of the proposed project is to determine if short-term dietary supplementation of magnesium will improve performance during a series of lab-based exercise tests, will favorably modify the gut-microbiota, and will augment skeletal muscle mitochondrial function.

Detailed description

Magnesium is the fourth most abundant mineral in the human body. It is critical to day-to-day physiological function including the regulation of metabolism, cardiovascular function, immune function, and the operation of the nervous system. In light of its important role in physiology, dietary supplementation of magnesium has been purported to improve athletic performance, although the precise mechanism is unclear. The foci of the proposed study is the ergogenic effects of magnesium, its potential influence on gut health, and its potential ability to improve skeletal muscle function. The investigators will be studying an athletic/competitive population of endurance-trained adults. This group is likely to be the most interested in the use of magnesium to enhance athletic performance. Also, by only recruiting habitual exercisers, the variability between participants is likely to be reduced compared with if the investigators had also recruited people who are usually sedentary.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTReMag

300 mg of ReMag dissolved in lemon flavor liquid

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo

Lemon flavored liquid

Sponsors

Christopher Bell
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Coded bottles

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomized to either placebo for 9-days of the intervention separated by a 3-week washout period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Competitive cyclists * Adult males and females (18 - 40 years, inclusive) who have exercised a minimum of 5 days per week, for a minimum of 30-minutes/session, during the previous 2 years. * Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) satisfying the minimum criteria for Good (sex- and age-adjusted) as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine.

Exclusion criteria

* Identification of a contra-indication to exercise during a 12-lead exercise stress test * Use of a magnesium supplement within the previous 4 weeks * Pregnancy or breast-feeding * Unable to perform vigorous exercise * History (previous diagnosis) of kidney disease * Use of laxatives, Zinc, diuretics, proton pump inhibitors, over the counter agents such as certain heartburn and GI/gut treatments (laxatives) which contain magnesium, Zinc or other high dose cations which reduce absorption of Magnesium

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of indirect Calorimetry (VO2max) to placeboAfter 8 days of interventionDuring a standard stress test VO2 max will be measured
Comparison of lactate threshold to placeboAfter 8 days of interventionDuring a standard stress test lactate threshold will be measured
Comparison of completion of time trial to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAmount of time it takes to cycle 10 kilometers
Comparison of power output to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionCycling for 30 seconds
Comparison of Mitochondrial Function to placeboAfter 8 days of interventionAssessed via high-resolution mitochondrial respirometry in permeabilized skeletal muscle.
Comparison of Shannon and Faith's microbiota diversity scores in feces to placeboAfter 9 days of intervention,Assessed via 16s ribosomal ribonucleic acid microbial profiling
Calculation and ordination of B-diversity scores for all fecal samples to assess clusteringAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 16s ribosomal ribonucleic acid microbial profiling
Determination of differentially abundant microbiota in feces of collected during treatment compared to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 16s ribosomal ribonucleic acid microbial profiling
Comparison of abundant microbiota to markers in feces to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size algorithm
Comparison Human Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 13-plex human T-cell cytokine panel
Comparison interferon gamma to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 13-plex human T-cell cytokine panel
Comparison interleukin 1 beta to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 13-plex human T-cell cytokine panel
Comparison interleukin 2 to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 13-plex human T-cell cytokine panel
Comparison interleukin 4 to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 13-plex human T-cell cytokine panel
Comparison interleukin 5 to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 13-plex human T-cell cytokine panel
Comparison interleukin 6 to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 13-plex human T-cell cytokine panel
Comparison interleukin 7 to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 13-plex human T-cell cytokine panel
Comparison interleukin 8 to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 13-plex human T-cell cytokine panel
Comparison interleukin 10 to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 13-plex human T-cell cytokine panel
Comparison interleukin 12 (p70) to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 13-plex human T-cell cytokine panel
Comparison interleukin 13 to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 13-plex human T-cell cytokine panel
Comparison Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 13-plex human T-cell cytokine panel
Comparison High-sensitivity C-reactive protein to placeboAfter 9 days of interventionAssessed via 13-plex human T-cell cytokine panel

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026