Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of HIL-214 in Children

A Phase 2b, Double-blind, Randomized, Multi-site, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of Intramuscular HIL-214 Norovirus Vaccine in Healthy Children 5 Months of Age at Initial Vaccination

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05281094
Enrollment
3084
Registered
2022-03-16
Start date
2022-04-28
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2025-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroenteritis

Brief summary

This is a randomized, placebo-controlled study that is being done to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two doses of the HIL-214 vaccine compared to a placebo. The study will enroll 3000 children who will be 5 months of age at the time of the first dose study vaccine. The second dose of study vaccine will be given 28 days after the first dose.

Detailed description

Noroviruses have emerged as the single most significant cause of gastroenteritis in both middle-high income countries and low resource settings worldwide. Those most at risk of severe illness include the very young, the elderly and immunocompromised individuals. Noroviruses are highly infectious, highly resistant to environmental conditions, and have multiple routes of transmission including person-to-person, food-borne and contaminated surfaces. Noroviruses can cause acute, mild to severe illness characterized by vomiting, diarrhea, fever, dehydration and abdominal pain, representing a significant burden to public health. The clinical presentation in adults and older children is similar. While mortality due to acute gastroenteritis (AGE) caused by norovirus in the pediatric population is rare in industrialized countries, it is more common in developing countries. Although potentially a cause for hospitalization in very young children, there are fewer cases during the first 6 months of life possibly due to the protection offered by maternal antibodies from trans-placental transfer and in breast milk. In addition, norovirus infections have significant socioeconomic impact on hospitals, schools, day care centers and other closed settings. As the burden of rotavirus in children decreases due to successful rotavirus vaccination programs in infants, norovirus infections are increasingly recognized as the primary cause of AGE in many countries around the world.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALHIL-214

2 injections - given on Day 1 and the second given between Day 29 - Day 57

BIOLOGICALPlacebo

2 injections - given on Day 1 and the second given between Day 29 - Day 57

Sponsors

HilleVax
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Months to 5 Months
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The subject should be 5 months of age (within plus or minus 14 days) male or female * Children who are in good health at the time of entry into the trial as determined by medical history, physical examination (including vital signs) and clinical judgment of the investigator * The subject's LAR signs and dates a written, informed consent form (ICF) and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any trial procedures, after the nature of the trial has been explained according to local regulatory requirements * Children whose LARs can and are willing to comply with trial procedures and are available for the duration of follow-up

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically significant abnormality in growth by height, weight, or head circumference (according to local guidelines) * Gastrointestinal abnormalities or any chronic gastrointestinal disease, including any uncorrected congenital malformation of the gastrointestinal tract according to medical history and/or physical examination * Known hypersensitivity or allergy to any of the investigational vaccine components (including excipients) * Any clinically significant active infection (as assessed by the investigator) or temperature ≥38.0°C (\>100.4°F), within 3 days of intended trial vaccination * Any serious chronic or progressive disease according to the judgment of the investigator (e.g., cardiac, renal or hepatic disease) * Individuals with history of, e.g., convulsions/febrile convulsions, or any illness, that, in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the results of the trial or pose additional risk to the subjects due to participation in the trial * Known or suspected impairment/alteration of immune function * Subjects with a known bleeding diathesis, or any condition that may be associated with a prolonged bleeding time * Subjects who received or are scheduled to receive any other vaccines within 14 days (for inactivated vaccines and oral polio vaccine) or 28 days (for other live vaccines) before or after any dose of trial vaccine * Subjects participating in any clinical trial with another investigational product 30 days prior to first trial visit or intend to participate in another clinical trial at any time during the conduct of this trial * Subjects known to be positive for or in evaluation for possible human immunodeficiency virus infection * Subject's LAR or subject's first-degree relatives involved in the trial conduct

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To Demonstrate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated Only With GI.1 or GII.4 Norovirus Genotypes.The duration of the primary observation period was 6 months starting at 28 days post dose 2.Time to first occurrence during the primary observation period, of moderate/severe AGE case associated only with GI.1 or GII.4 norovirus genotypes. Vaccine efficacy (VE) is defined as 100% \[1- (λV/λC)\], where λV and λC denote the hazard rates of the primary endpoint AGE case for the HIL 214 and placebo arms, respectively. The primary endpoint AGE case is defined as at least 3 loose or liquid stools OR at least 2 or more episodes of vomiting OR 1 or more loose or liquid stools plus 1 or more vomiting episodes in any 24-hour period. The presence of norovirus in onset stool samples was assessed by RT-PCR and norovirus-positive samples were genotyped by sequencing. Samples that were positive for GI.1 or GII.4 genotypes were further analyzed for the presence of co-pathogens. VE estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are also reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To Evaluate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated With GI.1 or GII.4 Norovirus Genotypes, Irrespective of Other Gastrointestinal Pathogens.The duration of the primary observation period was 6 months starting at 28 days post dose 2.Time to first occurrence during the primary observation period\* of moderate/severe AGE case associated with GI.1 or GII.4 norovirus genotypes, irrespective of other gastrointestinal pathogens. Vaccine efficacy (VE) is defined as 100% \[1- (λV/λC)\], where λV and λC denote the hazard rates of the primary endpoint AGE case for the HIL 214 and placebo arms, respectively. The primary endpoint AGE case is defined as at least 3 loose or liquid stools OR at least 2 or more episodes of vomiting OR 1 or more loose or liquid stools plus 1 or more vomiting episodes in any 24-hour period. The presence of norovirus in onset stool samples was assessed by RT-PCR and norovirus-positive samples were genotyped by sequencing.
To Evaluate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated With Any Norovirus Genogroup (GI or GII), Irrespective of Other Gastrointestinal PathogensThe duration of the primary observation period was 6 months starting at 28 days post dose 2.Time to first occurrence during the primary observation period of moderate/severe AGE case associated with any norovirus genogroup (GI or GII), irrespective of other gastrointestinal pathogens. Vaccine efficacy (VE) is defined as 100% \[1- (λV/λC)\], where λV and λC denote the hazard rates of the primary endpoint AGE case for the HIL 214 and placebo arms, respectively. The endpoint AGE case is defined as at least 3 loose or liquid stools OR at least 2 or more episodes of vomiting OR 1 or more loose or liquid stools plus 1 or more vomiting episodes in any 24-hour period. The presence of norovirus in onset stool samples was assessed by RT-PCR and norovirus positive samples were genogrouped by sequencing. Vaccine efficacy (VE) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are also reported.
Immunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboParticipant reaches 1 year of ageThe percentage of participants with a predefined seroresponse (≥4-fold rise in antibody concentration) at up to 56 days post dose 1 (Visit 2), 28 days post dose 2 (Visit 3), and/or at 1 year of age (visit 4) to the GI.1 and GII.4c components of HIL-214 and 95% confidence interval are reported. HBGA-blocking and pan-Ig assays were used for immunogenicity analyses
To Evaluate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated Only With Any Norovirus (GI or GII) Genogroup.The duration of the primary observation period was 6 months starting at 28 days post dose 2.Time to first occurrence during the primary observation period, of moderate/severe AGE case associated with any (GI or GII) genogroup Vaccine efficacy (VE) is defined as 100% \[1- (λV/λC)\], where λV and λC denote the hazard rates of the primary endpoint AGE case for the HIL 214 and placebo arms, respectively. The endpoint AGE case is defined as at least 3 loose or liquid stools OR at least 2 or more episodes of vomiting OR 1 or more loose or liquid stools plus 1 or more vomiting episodes in any 24-hour period. The presence of norovirus in onset stool samples was assessed by RT-PCR and norovirus positive samples were genogrouped by sequencing. Samples that were positive for GI or GII genogroups were further analyzed for the presence of co-pathogens. Vaccine efficacy (VE) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are also reported.
Safety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Up to 7 days after each dose of HIL-214 or placebo.Percentage of participants with solicited systemic AEs within 7 days of vaccine administration. Assessed AEs include drowsiness, irritability/fussiness, loss of appetite, vomiting, and diarrhea.
Safety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Vaccine WithdrawalUp to 28 days after first dose of HIL-214 or placebo.Percentage of participants with AEs leading to trial vaccine dose withdrawal.
Safety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Trial Withdrawal.From Day 1 to end of the trial/early termination.Percentage of participants with AEs leading to trial withdrawal.
Safety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Local Adverse Events (AEs)Up to 7 days after each dose of HIL-214 or placebo.Percentage of participants with solicited local (injection site) adverse events (AEs) within 7 days of vaccine administration. Assessed AEs include injection site pain, erythema, induration, and swelling.

Countries

Colombia, Dominican Republic, Honduras, Panama, Peru, Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the primary observation period of the trial (up to Visit 4) at 17 investigative sites in Panama, the Dominican Republic, Honduras, Peru, Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the United States from 28 April 2022 to 28 Dec 2023.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were enrolled in 1 of 2 treatment arms and received 2 doses of either HIL-214, a norovirus vaccine comprising 50 µg GI.1 virus-like particle (VLP) and 150 µg GII.4c VLP, adjuvanted with 500 µg of aluminum hydroxide, or placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
One dose of placebo on Day 1 and one dose of placebo between Day 28 and Day 56.
1,399
Experimental
One dose of HIL-214 on Day 1 and one dose of HIL-214 between Day 28 and Day 56.
1,425
Total2,824

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyDeath12
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2922
Overall StudyNot pre-specified reason85
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Legally Authorized Representative122103

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimentalTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous4.95 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.291
4.95 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.293
4.94 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.295
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1407 Participants2790 Participants1383 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
13 Participants26 Participants13 Participants
Head circumference42.06 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.292
42.07 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.304
42.08 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.316
Length64.05 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.731
64.10 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.694
64.16 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.657
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian or Alaskan Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
9 Participants23 Participants14 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
More than one race
9 Participants20 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Not Reported
64 Participants117 Participants53 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
1327 Participants2629 Participants1302 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Unknown
14 Participants29 Participants15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
42 participants86 participants44 participants
Region of Enrollment
Dominican Republic
284 participants557 participants273 participants
Region of Enrollment
Honduras
233 participants454 participants221 participants
Region of Enrollment
Panama
769 participants1533 participants764 participants
Region of Enrollment
Peru
95 participants190 participants95 participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
1 participants2 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 participants2 participants1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
725 Participants1448 Participants723 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
700 Participants1376 Participants676 Participants
Weight7.395 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9979
7.409 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.992
7.423 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9861

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1,5362 / 1,541
other
Total, other adverse events
889 / 1,536902 / 1,541
serious
Total, serious adverse events
165 / 1,536169 / 1,541

Outcome results

Primary

To Demonstrate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated Only With GI.1 or GII.4 Norovirus Genotypes.

Time to first occurrence during the primary observation period, of moderate/severe AGE case associated only with GI.1 or GII.4 norovirus genotypes. Vaccine efficacy (VE) is defined as 100% \[1- (λV/λC)\], where λV and λC denote the hazard rates of the primary endpoint AGE case for the HIL 214 and placebo arms, respectively. The primary endpoint AGE case is defined as at least 3 loose or liquid stools OR at least 2 or more episodes of vomiting OR 1 or more loose or liquid stools plus 1 or more vomiting episodes in any 24-hour period. The presence of norovirus in onset stool samples was assessed by RT-PCR and norovirus-positive samples were genotyped by sequencing. Samples that were positive for GI.1 or GII.4 genotypes were further analyzed for the presence of co-pathogens. VE estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are also reported.

Time frame: The duration of the primary observation period was 6 months starting at 28 days post dose 2.

Population: Modified Full-Analysis Set (mFAS): The mFAS included all participants who were randomized and received 2 doses of HIL-214 or placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTo Demonstrate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated Only With GI.1 or GII.4 Norovirus Genotypes.3.07 monthsStandard Deviation 2.059
ExperimentalTo Demonstrate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated Only With GI.1 or GII.4 Norovirus Genotypes.3.29 monthsStandard Deviation 1.746
Comparison: VE is defined 100% \[1- (λV/λC)\], where λV and λC denote the hazard rates for the HIL-214 and placebo arms respectively, obtained via a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, using Efron's method for handling ties. The model includes a term for vaccine group and was stratified by country, whereby the United States, Dominican Republic, and Puerto Rico were considered one country. The 95% confidence interval as calculated by subtracting the confidence limits of hazard ratio from 1.95% CI: [-52.51, 50.35]
Secondary

Immunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo

The percentage of participants with a predefined seroresponse (≥4-fold rise in antibody concentration) at up to 56 days post dose 1 (Visit 2), 28 days post dose 2 (Visit 3), and/or at 1 year of age (visit 4) to the GI.1 and GII.4c components of HIL-214 and 95% confidence interval are reported. HBGA-blocking and pan-Ig assays were used for immunogenicity analyses

Time frame: Participant reaches 1 year of age

Population: Full-Analysis Set, The FAS will include all subjects who are randomized and received at least 1 dose of HIL-214 or placebo.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 and GII.4c HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 20 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 20.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 31.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 41.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GII.4c HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 21.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti- GII.4c HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 32.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti- GII.4c HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 46.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 and GII.4c HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 30.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 and GII.4c HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 40.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 21.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 32.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 48.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GII.4c pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 23.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GII.4c pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 38.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GII.4c pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 423.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 and GII.4c pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 20.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 and GII.4c pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 31.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti- GI.1 and GII.4c pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 44.7 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GII.4c pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 383.9 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 284.6 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 236.8 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti- GI.1 and GII.4c pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 474.7 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 395.5 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 398.9 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 486.2 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GII.4c pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 475.5 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GII.4c HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 27.4 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 497.1 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti- GII.4c HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 343.0 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 and GII.4c pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 383.5 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti- GII.4c HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 425.0 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 and GII.4c HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 24.8 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GII.4c pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 237.9 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 and GII.4c HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 342.3 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 and GII.4c pan-Ig seroresponse rate at Visit 235.9 percentage of participants
ExperimentalImmunogenicity of HIL-214 Compared to PlaceboAnti-GI.1 and GII.4c HBGA-blocking seroresponse rate at Visit 422.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Safety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Trial Withdrawal.

Percentage of participants with AEs leading to trial withdrawal.

Time frame: From Day 1 to end of the trial/early termination.

Population: Safety Analysis Set; all participants that received at least 1 dose of HIL-214 or placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Trial Withdrawal.0.1 percentage of participants
ExperimentalSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Trial Withdrawal.0.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Safety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Vaccine Withdrawal

Percentage of participants with AEs leading to trial vaccine dose withdrawal.

Time frame: Up to 28 days after first dose of HIL-214 or placebo.

Population: Safety Analysis Set; all participants that received at least 1 dose of HIL 214 or placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Vaccine Withdrawal0 percentage of participants
ExperimentalSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Vaccine Withdrawal0.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Safety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Local Adverse Events (AEs)

Percentage of participants with solicited local (injection site) adverse events (AEs) within 7 days of vaccine administration. Assessed AEs include injection site pain, erythema, induration, and swelling.

Time frame: Up to 7 days after each dose of HIL-214 or placebo.

Population: Safety Analysis Set, all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of trial vaccine (HIL-214 or placebo).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Local Adverse Events (AEs)Injection site pain5.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Local Adverse Events (AEs)Induration0 percentage of participants
PlaceboSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Local Adverse Events (AEs)Erythema1.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Local Adverse Events (AEs)Swelling0.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Local Adverse Events (AEs)Any solicited local AE6.7 percentage of participants
ExperimentalSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Local Adverse Events (AEs)Swelling0.5 percentage of participants
ExperimentalSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Local Adverse Events (AEs)Any solicited local AE10.4 percentage of participants
ExperimentalSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Local Adverse Events (AEs)Injection site pain8.2 percentage of participants
ExperimentalSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Local Adverse Events (AEs)Erythema2.0 percentage of participants
ExperimentalSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Local Adverse Events (AEs)Induration0.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Safety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)

Percentage of participants with solicited systemic AEs within 7 days of vaccine administration. Assessed AEs include drowsiness, irritability/fussiness, loss of appetite, vomiting, and diarrhea.

Time frame: Up to 7 days after each dose of HIL-214 or placebo.

Population: Safety Analysis Set, all participants that received at least 1 dose of HIL-214 or placebo.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Irritability/fussiness18.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Loss of appetite7.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Vomiting7.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Drowsiness10.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Diarrhea14.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Any solicited systemic AE35.2 percentage of participants
ExperimentalSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Diarrhea15.4 percentage of participants
ExperimentalSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Any solicited systemic AE37.7 percentage of participants
ExperimentalSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Drowsiness12.7 percentage of participants
ExperimentalSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Loss of appetite8.4 percentage of participants
ExperimentalSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Vomiting8.6 percentage of participants
ExperimentalSafety of HIL-214 Compared to Placebo - Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Irritability/fussiness20.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

To Evaluate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated Only With Any Norovirus (GI or GII) Genogroup.

Time to first occurrence during the primary observation period, of moderate/severe AGE case associated with any (GI or GII) genogroup Vaccine efficacy (VE) is defined as 100% \[1- (λV/λC)\], where λV and λC denote the hazard rates of the primary endpoint AGE case for the HIL 214 and placebo arms, respectively. The endpoint AGE case is defined as at least 3 loose or liquid stools OR at least 2 or more episodes of vomiting OR 1 or more loose or liquid stools plus 1 or more vomiting episodes in any 24-hour period. The presence of norovirus in onset stool samples was assessed by RT-PCR and norovirus positive samples were genogrouped by sequencing. Samples that were positive for GI or GII genogroups were further analyzed for the presence of co-pathogens. Vaccine efficacy (VE) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are also reported.

Time frame: The duration of the primary observation period was 6 months starting at 28 days post dose 2.

Population: Modified Full-Analysis Set (mFAS): The mFAS included all participants who were randomized and received 2 doses of HIL-214 or placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated Only With Any Norovirus (GI or GII) Genogroup.3.16 monthsStandard Deviation 1.886
ExperimentalTo Evaluate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated Only With Any Norovirus (GI or GII) Genogroup.3.32 monthsStandard Deviation 1.519
Comparison: VE is defined 100% \[1- (λV/λC)\], where λV and λC denote the hazard rates for the HIL-214 and placebo arms respectively, obtained via a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, using Efron's method for handling ties. The model includes a term for vaccine group and was stratified by country, whereby the United States, Dominican Republic, and Puerto Rico were considered one country. The 95% confidence interval as calculated by subtracting the confidence limits of hazard ratio from 195% CI: [-24.52, 44.7]
Secondary

To Evaluate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated With Any Norovirus Genogroup (GI or GII), Irrespective of Other Gastrointestinal Pathogens

Time to first occurrence during the primary observation period of moderate/severe AGE case associated with any norovirus genogroup (GI or GII), irrespective of other gastrointestinal pathogens. Vaccine efficacy (VE) is defined as 100% \[1- (λV/λC)\], where λV and λC denote the hazard rates of the primary endpoint AGE case for the HIL 214 and placebo arms, respectively. The endpoint AGE case is defined as at least 3 loose or liquid stools OR at least 2 or more episodes of vomiting OR 1 or more loose or liquid stools plus 1 or more vomiting episodes in any 24-hour period. The presence of norovirus in onset stool samples was assessed by RT-PCR and norovirus positive samples were genogrouped by sequencing. Vaccine efficacy (VE) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are also reported.

Time frame: The duration of the primary observation period was 6 months starting at 28 days post dose 2.

Population: Modified Full-Analysis Set (mFAS): The mFAS included all participants who were randomized and received 2 doses of HIL-214 or placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated With Any Norovirus Genogroup (GI or GII), Irrespective of Other Gastrointestinal Pathogens3.19 monthsStandard Deviation 1.852
ExperimentalTo Evaluate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated With Any Norovirus Genogroup (GI or GII), Irrespective of Other Gastrointestinal Pathogens3.17 monthsStandard Deviation 1.541
Comparison: VE is defined 100% \[1- (λV/λC)\], where λV and λC denote the hazard rates for the HIL-214 and placebo arms respectively, obtained via a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, using Efron's method for handling ties. The model includes a term for vaccine group and was stratified by country, whereby the United States, Dominican Republic, and Puerto Rico were considered one country. The 95% confidence interval as calculated by subtracting the confidence limits of hazard ratio from 1.95% CI: [-45.04, 22]
Secondary

To Evaluate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated With GI.1 or GII.4 Norovirus Genotypes, Irrespective of Other Gastrointestinal Pathogens.

Time to first occurrence during the primary observation period\* of moderate/severe AGE case associated with GI.1 or GII.4 norovirus genotypes, irrespective of other gastrointestinal pathogens. Vaccine efficacy (VE) is defined as 100% \[1- (λV/λC)\], where λV and λC denote the hazard rates of the primary endpoint AGE case for the HIL 214 and placebo arms, respectively. The primary endpoint AGE case is defined as at least 3 loose or liquid stools OR at least 2 or more episodes of vomiting OR 1 or more loose or liquid stools plus 1 or more vomiting episodes in any 24-hour period. The presence of norovirus in onset stool samples was assessed by RT-PCR and norovirus-positive samples were genotyped by sequencing.

Time frame: The duration of the primary observation period was 6 months starting at 28 days post dose 2.

Population: Modified Full-Analysis Set (mFAS): The mFAS included all participants who were randomized and received 2 doses of HIL-214 or placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated With GI.1 or GII.4 Norovirus Genotypes, Irrespective of Other Gastrointestinal Pathogens.3.11 monthsStandard Deviation 1.981
ExperimentalTo Evaluate the Efficacy of HIL-214 Vaccine Against Moderate/Severe Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) Associated With GI.1 or GII.4 Norovirus Genotypes, Irrespective of Other Gastrointestinal Pathogens.3.29 monthsStandard Deviation 1.628
Comparison: VE is defined 100% \[1- (λV/λC)\], where λV and λC denote the hazard rates for the HIL-214 and placebo arms respectively, obtained via a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, using Efron's method for handling ties. The model includes a term for vaccine group and was stratified by country, whereby the United States, Dominican Republic, and Puerto Rico were considered one country. The 95% confidence interval as calculated by subtracting the confidence limits of hazard ratio from 1.95% CI: [-34.7, 44.98]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026