Skip to content

Efficacy of the echOpen Device to Detect Pyelocaliceal Dilation and Hepatic Steatosis

Assessment of the echOpen Ultra-portable Ultrasound Device in Daily Use by Clinicians. Part II: Detection of Pyelocaliceal Dilation and Hepatic Steatosis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05280145
Acronym
CLIN-ECHO-II
Enrollment
200
Registered
2022-03-15
Start date
2022-08-21
Completion date
2023-11-17
Last updated
2024-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fatty Liver, Hepatic Steatosis, Hydronephrosis

Keywords

Ultrasound, Ultrasonography, Point-of-care-ultrasound, Hepatic Steatosis, pyelocaliceal system

Brief summary

In recent years, portable and ultra-portable ultrasound devices are increasingly used by the non radiologists, notably cardiologists or obstetrician gynecologist, at the patient's bedside to visualize and measure anatomical structures and fluid and provide the clinical examination with additional signs allowing quicker and more confident clinical decisions. This innovative approach is slowed down by the accessibility of these miniaturized devices, the price of which remains high. The echOpen device includes an ultra-portable ultrasound probe and a mobile application that allows the image to be displayed on a smartphone via a WIFI protocol. The objective of the clinical investigation is to show that the echOpen device, using three frequencies 3.5 Mhz, 5.0 Mhz and 7.5 Mhz, allows identifying the semiological signs or anatomical structures of interest located at several depths of the body, with a performance similar to other devices routinely used in clinical departments.

Detailed description

The echOpen device includes an ultrasound probe and a mobile application. The mechanical probe emits at three ultrasound frequencies, 3.5 Mhz, 5.0 Mhz and 7.5 Mhz, which allows the exploration of the interior of the body at different depths in a non-invasive and non-irradiating manner. Thus, the purpose of the echOpen device is, on one hand, to guide the diagnosis during the clinical examination and, on the other hand, to identify anatomical structures in order to assist in management. The objective of the clinical investigation is to demonstrate that the echOpen device is able to identify semiological signs and localize anatomical structures at different depths of the body, with a performance not inferior to that of other ultrasound devices, routinely employed in hospital clinical departments. The signs of interest (i.e. detection of pyelocaliceal dilation (3.5 Mhz) and hepatic steatosis (5.0 Mhz) were chosen for their clinical usefulness (their identification during the clinical examination constitutes an argument for orientation and/or severity) and for their prevalence in the study population. An ultrasound probe in use in the hospital clinical departments where the investigation takes place will be employed as a comparator to judge the performance of the echOpen device. This clinical investigation is part of a CE marking procedure.

Interventions

Depending on the clinical picture, the patient is examined with EchOpen to detect the presence or absence of pyelocaliceal dilatation or hepatic steatosis

DEVICEUltrasound device routinely used in the department

Patient who was first examined with EchOpen, is secondarily examined with an ultrasound probe used routinely in the department to detect pyelocaliceal dilatation or hepatic steatosis

PROCEDUREUltrasound examination by an independent referent radiologist

In a case of discordance between the assessments made with echOpen and the usual ultrasound device, an independent referent radiologist will use a standard ultrasound machine to constitute the gold standard (GS) rating. If the latter is not available to carry out the third ultrasound scan within a timeframe deemed clinically acceptable, then the evaluation will be carried out in a delayed manner, using the video loops and image captures saved during the two initial ultrasound scans.

Sponsors

ECHOPEN
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
EIT Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A single group, comparative, non-randomized, controlled study. Each patient represents her/his own control: the patient is examined consecutively with the echOpen probe, then with the probe routinely used in the department

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patient (age ≥ 18 years old) * Patient having signed the informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation * Patient affiliated to the social security scheme * Patient arriving in the hospital clinical ward (own initiative or by emergency services) whose clinical symptomatology suggests the presence of pathological elements which would be visible using an ultrasound probe in the following cases: * Search for pyelocaliceal dilation: patient consulting for abdominal and/or lumbar pain and/or iliac fossa, fever, pain in the right or left iliac fossa, anuresis * Search for hepatic steatosis: in a case of global clinical examination, abnormal laboratory test results, known or suspected metabolic disease, any situation suggesting the presence of hepatic steatosis

Exclusion criteria

* Minor patient (age \< 18 years) * Patients under the State Medical Assistance (AME) * Obese patient (body mass index \> 29.9) * Patient in too serious condition for the clinical examination to be done fully and/or with additional exploratory time * Unstable patient: need for immediate care, impossibility to carry out a thorough clinical examination including interview, palpation, auscultation, percussion * Known allergy to ultrasound gel

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence of Pyelocaliceal dilationDay 0Pyelocaliceal system assessment by using echOpen or a portable ultrasound routinely used in the department and scored as follows: 0, normal condition; 1, normal parenchyma, dilated renal pelvis, undilated calyces; 2, normal parenchyma, renal pelvis and calyces dilated, papillary impression preserved; 3, parenchyma thinned, significant pyelocaliceal dilation with bulging calyxes and disappearance of the papillary impression; 4, very thinned parenchyma, massive pyelocaliceal dilation, disappearance of the pyelocaliceal differentiation.
Presence of Hepatic steatosisDay 0Hepatic steatosis assessment by using echOpen or a portable ultrasound routinely used in the department and scored on the base of liver echogenicity as follows: 0, normal condition; 1, local hyperechogenicity; 2, diffuse hyperechogenicity

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pyelocaliceal dilation determined using a gold standard procedureDay 0Pyelocaliceal system assessment by by an independent referent radiologist using a standard ultrasound machine and scored as follows: 0, normal condition; 1, normal parenchyma, dilated renal pelvis, undilated calyces; 2, normal parenchyma, renal pelvis and calyces dilated, papillary impression preserved; 3, parenchyma thinned, significant pyelocaliceal dilation with bulging calyxes and disappearance of the papillary impression; 4, very thinned parenchyma, massive pyelocaliceal dilation, disappearance of the pyelocaliceal differentiation.
Hepatic steatosis determined using a gold standard procedureDay 0Hepatic steatosis assessment by by an independent referent radiologist using a standard ultrasound machine and scored on the base of liver echogenicity as follows: 0, normal condition; 1, local hyperechogenicity; 2, diffuse hyperechogenicity

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026