Skip to content

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Multaq® for Safety in Atrial Fibrillation

SLR/NMA of Multaq® vs Sotalol to Assess for Safety in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (AFib)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05279833
Enrollment
87810
Registered
2022-03-15
Start date
2021-09-24
Completion date
2022-03-31
Last updated
2024-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

A systematic literature review (SLR) will be conducted to understand the landscape of evidence on the relative safety and effectiveness/efficacy of dronedarone compared to sotalol in patients with AFib within interventional clinical trials and observational studies.

Interventions

Pharmaceutical form is tablet and route of administration is oral

Pharmaceutical form is tablet and route of administration is oral

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Following eligibility criteria are defined to select relevant studies from the literature * Adults with Atrial Fibrillation(AFib) (non-permanent, including paroxysmal or persistent, long-standing persistent AFib \[over 12 months\])) * Participants have received either Dronedarone or Sotalol * controlled clinical trials or comparative observational studies( prospective/retrospective cohort, case-control studies, population-based studies or registry based studies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with atrial fibrillation (AFib) recurrenceAs reported in studies included in the systematic review up to 10 years
Number of participants with Cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizationAs reported in studies included in the systematic review up to 10 yearsCV hospitalization is defined as composite of heart failure hospitalization, AFib hospitalization, MI, and stroke
Number of participants with ventricular proarrhythmiaAs reported in studies included in the systematic review up to 10 years
Number of all-cause mortality eventsAs reported in studies included in the systematic review up to 10 years
Number of cardiovascular mortality eventsAs reported in studies included in the systematic review up to 10 yearsincludes arrhythmia-related mortality

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with conduction disordersAs reported in studies included in the systematic review up to 10 yearsAtrioventricular block (2nd or 3rd degree) or Requirement of pacemaker implants
Number of participants with myocardial infarctionAs reported in studies included in the systematic review up to 10 years
Number of participants with strokeAs reported in studies included in the systematic review up to 10 years
Number of participants with heart failure hospitalizationAs reported in studies included in the systematic review up to 10 years
Number of participants with AFib hospitalizationAs reported in studies included in the systematic review up to 10 years

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026