Skip to content

Outcome of Pulpotomy Versus Root Canal Therapy

Quality of Life, Satisfaction and Outcome After Full Pulpotomy Compared to Root Canal Therapy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05279781
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-03-15
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
2025-01-31
Last updated
2022-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caries, Pulpitis - Irreversible

Brief summary

Root canal therapy (RCT) is indicated once the pulp is diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis. Despite favorable success rate reported for RCT in vital cases, it is time consuming, and might increases fracture susceptibility of teeth. With the advancement of materials and better understanding of pulpal healing, vital pulp therapy is practiced as an alternative treatment with high success rate. The aim of this study is to explore the outcome, quality of life and patient satisfaction after full pulpotomy compared to RCT.

Detailed description

Permanent molar teeth with carious pulp exposure and mature roots as evident on the preoperative periapical radiograph will be included in the study. The teeth will be randomly divided into 2 groups (n=30). The first group will be treated with Biodentine full pulpotomy and the second group will be endodontically treated. Based on a previously validated questionnaire. The quality of life and satisfaction of patients after pulpotomy treatment will be evaluated compared to those after endodontic treatment. Clinical and radiographic assessment of the treated teeth will be done 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Pain level will be recorded preoperatively and 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 days after treatment. The questionnaire consists of five components: 1. Characteristics of the patient; including age, gender, socioeconomic status, smoking, oral hygiene practices, frequency of dental visits, and dental history. 2. Postoperative complications including postoperative pain, discomfort,or swelling. These symptoms will be evaluated after 1, 2, 3,5 and 7 days by contacting the patient on the phone and at follow up visits at 3, 6, and 12 months. 3. Quality of life instruments designed 4. Semantic scales designed to evaluate patient satisfaction with the treatment received. Clinical and radiographic assessment of the treated teeth will be recorded. Success will be defined as clinically asymptomatic tooth with no sinus tract or swelling or periapical lesion. Data will be analysed statistically using appropriate tests based on the distribution of the results.

Interventions

Complete root canal treatment will be performed followed by direct restoration

PROCEDUREPulpotomy

Full pulpotomy followed by direct restoration

Sponsors

Jordan University of Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participant will not be informed whether complete pulp removal or partial treatment was done. Operator and investigator cannot be blinded due to differences in the procedure and it will be evident on the radiographs, so it cannot be masked during radiographic evaluation.

Intervention model description

Two groups. One will receive root canal treatment t and the other will receive pulpotomy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Medically fit patient * mature permanent tooth with deep caries * diagnosis of irreversible pulpits. * tooth is restored with a direct restoration

Exclusion criteria

* immature teeth * teeth were hemostasis cannot be achieved after pulpotomy * necrotic teeth * lack of response to cold test

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post operative pain level on numerical pain scale7 daysPain level after treatment will be assessed on a numerical scale from 0-10 where is zero refer to no pain and 10 is the most sever pain.
Post operative pain level on visual analogue scale7 daysPain level after treatment will be assessed on a visual analogy scale from 0-10, where is zero refer to no pain and 10 is the most sever pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical success6, 12, 24, 48 monthsThe tooth should be pain free, no sinus tract, no tenderness to palpation and no swelling. As measured by clinical examination
Radiographic success6, 12, 24, 48 monthsPeriapical x-ray will be taken it should show no bone lesions or root resorption

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
The quality of life questionnaire6,12, 24, 48 monthsA questionnaire validated previously by Dugas et al 2002 will be used to assess Quality of life

Countries

Jordan

Contacts

Primary ContactProf Taha
n.taha@just.edu.jo+962776566110
Backup ContactNessrin Taha, PhD
nessrin_taha@yahoo.com+962776566110

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026