Skip to content

Smile Arc Assessment in Orthodontic Patients Following Smile Arc Protection VS MBT Placement Guide Bonding Strategies

Smile Arc Assessment in Orthodontic Patients Following Smile Arc Protection Versus MBT Placement Guide Bonding Strategies: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05277506
Enrollment
22
Registered
2022-03-14
Start date
2022-01-10
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2022-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthodontic Appliance Complication

Brief summary

The study will be performed on human subjects undergoing orthodontic treatment to correct mild crowding with both techniques enhancing the final smile characteristics of the patients.

Detailed description

The study concisits of two groups, the intervention group entails performing bonding of orthodontic brackets following smile arc protection bonding strategy while the control group entails performing bonding using the MBT placement guide and comparing the final smile outcomes after reaching steel archwires for both groups using customized questionnaires for orthodontists and laypersons.

Interventions

DEVICE18 inch slot MBT orthodontic brackets bonded using smile arc protection bonding strategy

female patients with mild crowding will recieve orthodontic brackets bonding using smile arc protection bonding strategy

DEVICE18 inch slot MBT orthodontic brackets boned using MBT placement guide

female patients with mild crowding will recieve orthodontic brackets bonding using MBT placement guide bonding strategy

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
16 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* female patients * no/mild/moderate crowding or spacing * non-extraction treatment decision with non-extraction profile * adults age 16-30 years * full permanent dentition including fully erupted 7s not necessarily 8s * good oral hygiene.

Exclusion criteria

* severe crowding * cleft lip and palate/syndromic patients * bad oral hygiene * unerupted or partially erupted 7s * extracted or missing teeth

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
smile arc assessment by orthodontists6 months follow upsubjective assessment of the beauty of the smile using close up photographs and questionnaires filled by orthodontists and graded scale from 0-10

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
smile arc analysis using frontal extraoral photographs of the posed smile6 months follow upanalysis in millimeters for anthropometric measurements

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026