Skip to content

New Tool to Enhance Post-stroke Upper Extremity Disability

Addressing Socioeconomic Disparities in Post-stroke Upper-extremity Disability Through the Development of an Accessible, New Tool

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05277389
Enrollment
21
Registered
2022-03-14
Start date
2022-12-20
Completion date
2023-12-15
Last updated
2025-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

Individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to have a stroke, more disabled at 3 months, and less likely to be independently ambulatory. Individuals with low SES struggle to adhere to physician guidelines because of 1) increased disability leaves patients ineligible or unable to tolerate therapy, and 2) poor access to quality care i.e., lack of transportation to therapy. To reduce post-stroke disparity in low SES groups, society must invest in development of novel tools that make therapy more accessible. For the past 5 years, the PI has been developing Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy (START), a tele-enabled, low-cost treatment to improve upper-extremity therapy outcomes in individuals with stroke - in particular individuals with severe-to-moderate stroke. START is the application of a startling, acoustic stimulus (via headphones) which increases the intensity of practice, particularly in severe patient populations. START is adjuvant, meaning it does not replace clinical practice but instead enhances current evidence-based treatments. Objective: the investigators seek to determine if START can be used to enhance functionally relevant movement of the upper extremity. Preliminary data: Individuals with severe-to-moderate disability from a stroke completed a remotely delivered, 3-day training of object manipulation with START. Box and Blocks, which was targeted during training, demonstrated a large increase under START (+47.1%) compared to Control (+3.3%). Modified functional reach was also increased under START (+8.9%) compared to Control (+1.1%). Impairment also decreased under START (Upper-Extremity-Fugl-Meyer: +8.6%) resulting in subject-reported increase in arm function both in quantity (Motor Activity Log: +26.2%) and quality (+20.2%). These results indicate that START can be deployed remotely and may prove a valuable, adjuvant tool to enhance functional upper extremity movement. The investigators propose to perform a Phase 1 clinical trial on a larger cohort of 58 subjects, with a longer, 5-day training with the goal of establishing that START can 1) enhance functional movement of the upper extremity and 2) generate sustainable changes that impact quality of life. Impact: This proposal is significant because it tests a tool that has the potential to directly target the causes leading to disparity of care for individuals with low SES. A third (34%) of 6.5 million people in the U.S. with stroke are on Medicaid or uninsured. Our best evidence-based therapies (e.g., high-intensity, CIMT) and our emerging rehabilitation technologies (e.g., TMS, robotics) are inaccessible to our minority and low SES populations. START addresses disparity because it 1) targets individuals with severe disability, which disproportionally affects low SES and minority groups, and 2) is tele-enabled eliminating transportation which 60% of individuals with low SES report as a barrier to care. If successful, this study will set the stage for larger trials to establish 1) the effectiveness of START to be incorporated into traditional therapy and as well as patient compliance, adherence, and tolerance - particularly in low SES groups.

Detailed description

Individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to have a stroke and more likely to have severe upper extremity dysfunction following that stroke. Patients from low SES backgrounds receive less out-patient care, are discharged more quickly, and are less likely to receive evidence-based, guideline recommended care. The mechanisms underlying disparity in treatment are multifaceted but a crucial contributor is individuals with low SES struggle to adhere to clinician guidelines because of 1) poor access to quality care - 60% of individuals with low SES report lack of transportation as a barrier to care, 2) increased severity requires high-intensity/ high-dose therapy which is not fully covered by traditional copay models or Medicaid/Medicare which have caps on therapy costs. To reduce post-stroke disparity in low SES groups, society needs to invest in the development of novel tools that make therapy more accessible or society runs the risk of furthering the inequities that leave our poor and minority populations unable to participate in daily life and return to work. The PI has been developing Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy (START), a tele-enabled, low-cost treatment to improve therapy outcomes in individuals with stroke - in particular individuals with severe stroke. START is the application of a startling, acoustic stimulus (via headphones) administered in conjunction with traditional therapy. Distinct from other auditory treatments (e.g. metronome), START represents endogenous activation of the cortico-reticular system that increases the intensity of practice leading to faster therapy outcomes, particularly in severe stroke. START increases the intensity of muscle activity i.e., more frequent activity onset, larger amplitude (2-3-fold higher than maximum voluntary capacity), and faster onsets. START is adjuvant, meaning it does not replace clinical practice but instead enhances current evidence-based treatments. As START can be administered safely with a cellphone and headphones (often already available to patients), patients can continue to practice at home safely without therapist supervision. OBJECTIVE: Determine if START can be used to enhance functionally relevant movement of the upper extremity. In our preliminary data, individuals with severe-to-moderate disability from a stroke completed a remotely delivered, 3-day training with START. Box and Blocks had a large increase under START (+47.1%) compared to Control (+3.3%). The Modified Functional Reach Test also increased under START (+8.9%) compared to Control (+1.1%). Impairment decreased under START (Upper-Extremity-Fugl-Meyer: +8.6%) resulting in subject-reported increase in arm function both in quantity (Motor Activity Log: +26.2%) and quality (+20.2%). These results indicate that START can be deployed remotely and may prove a valuable, adjuvant tool to enhance functional upper extremity movement. The investigators propose to perform a Phase 1 clinical trial on a larger cohort of 58 subjects, with a longer, 5-day training, and more rigorous assessment of function with the goal of establishing that START can 1) enhance functional movement of the upper extremity and 2) generate sustainable changes that impact quality of life. The investigation team is uniquely positioned to pursue these objective. The team made up experts in START, upper-extremity post-stroke disability, engineering including app development (Claire Honeycutt, PhD, PI), physical therapy, high-intensity training, focus in severe stroke (Pamela Bosch, DPT, PhD, Co-I), occupational therapy, remote delivery/telehealth, rater fidelity, randomized controlled trials (Veronica Rowe, PhD, OTR/L, Co-I). Finally, a data analytics/statistics consultant (Venn Ravichandran, PhD). Together, the investigators will explore the following aims. Aim 1: To establish that START can increase functional paretic limb usage, the investigators will perform a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of START on therapy outcomes. The investigators will perform a stratified, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized controlled trial with individuals with severe-moderate stroke (UEFM 0-42/66; MAS 0-4/4) - with recruitment focused on individuals with low SES. Following baseline assessment, subjects will receive training consisting of 5 consecutive days of training focusing on object manipulation. Subjects will either receive therapy with START or without (Control). Outcome measures will be: % change in paretic arm impairment (Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer: FMA-UE), spasticity (modified Ashworth: MA & modified Tradieu Scales: MTS), function (Action Research Arm Test: ARAT), patient reported Quality of life (stroke impact scale: SIS), functional independence (modified Rankin Scale: mRS), and arm function (Motor Activity Log: MAL). H1: Training with START will increase paretic arm function (ARAT) and self-reported arm function (MAL) compared to training without START. Aim 2: To establish that START generates sustainable functional changes that impact quality of life, the investigators will re-assess upper-extremity function and self-reported quality of life at one-month. All outcome measures (FMA-UE, MA, MTS, ARAT, SIS, mRS, MAL) will be re-administered one-month post training. H2: START gains will be retained more than Control and retention will be associated with higher quality of life measures (e.g., SIS, MAL) one-month post-START training. IMPACT: This proposal is significant because it tests a tool that has the potential to directly target the causes leading to disparity of care for individuals with low SES. A third (34%) of 6.5 million people in the U.S. with stroke are on Medicaid or uninsured. Our best evidence-based therapies (e.g., high-intensity, CIMT) and our emerging rehabilitation technologies (e.g., TMS, robotics) are inaccessible to our minority and low SES populations. START addresses disparity because it 1) targets individuals with severe disability, which disproportionally affects low SES and minority groups, and 2) is tele-enabled eliminating transportation. If successful, this study will set the stage for larger trials to establish 1) the effectiveness of START to be incorporated into traditional therapy and as well as patient compliance, adherence, and tolerance - particularly in low SES groups.

Interventions

Application of startling acoustic stimuli during practice of movement task

OTHERSham Control

Practice of Movement task without START

Sponsors

Arizona State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. \>18 years old 2. Capacity to provide informed consent 3. Cerebral stroke at least 6 months prior to testing 4. Presence of upper extremity impairment associated with stroke 5. Corrected pure tone threshold (octave frequencies 250- 4000 Hz) norms for their age and gender27,28 NOTE: Audiometry data will be collected for all participants by lab personnel trained by an audiologist in a sound-attenuated booth. We expect that \ 30% of participants will use hearing aids; we will not exclude these individuals but rather include hearing aid use as a covariate in analyses.

Exclusion criteria

1. Severe concurrent medical problems (e.g. uncontrolled cardiorespiratory impairment) 2. Acute/painful condition/injury of upper extremity/spine that interfere with ability to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Retention in Motor Activity Log (MAL)Retention of measure comparing baseline to one-monthThe Motor Activity Log (MAL) assesses arm use in daily activities post-stroke. The Amount of Use (AOU) subscale (0-5) rates 30 tasks; higher scores indicate more use. The total score sums the 30 AOU task scores, ranging from 0 to 150. Units on a scale.
Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Total Score From Baseline to Post-InterventionTime from Baseline to Post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) assesses upper extremity function, specifically arm and hand motor abilities, in individuals with neurological conditions. The test evaluates grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement through 19 standardized tasks. Each task is scored from 0 (no movement) to 3 (normal movement), yielding four subscale scores (Grasp, Grip, Pinch, Gross Movement) that are summed to compute a total score. The total score ranges from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better upper extremity function. Subscale ranges are: Grasp (0-18), Grip (0-12), Pinch (0-18), and Gross Movement (0-9). The outcome measure reports the change in the total ARAT score from baseline to post-intervention, with positive values reflecting improved function. Scores are reported as units on a scale.
Retention in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)Comparing baseline to one-month post (1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) assesses upper extremity function, specifically arm and hand motor abilities, in individuals with neurological conditions. The test evaluates grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement through 19 standardized tasks. Each task is scored from 0 (no movement) to 3 (normal movement), yielding four subscale scores (Grasp, Grip, Pinch, Gross Movement) that are summed to compute a total score. The total score ranges from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better upper extremity function. Subscale ranges are: Grasp (0-18), Grip (0-12), Pinch (0-18), and Gross Movement (0-9). The outcome measure reports the change in the total ARAT score from baseline to post-intervention, with positive values reflecting improved function. Scores are reported as units on a scale.
Change in Motor Activity Log (MAL) Amount of Use Score From Baseline to Post-InterventionTime from Baseline to Post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)The Motor Activity Log (MAL) assesses arm use in daily activities post-stroke. The Amount of Use subscale (0-5) rates 30 tasks; higher scores mean more use. Total score averages task scores (0-5). Change in total score is reported. Units on a scale. MAL was taken at baseline and then at one-month post intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer (UEFM) Baseline to Post-interventionTime from Baseline to Post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) evaluates motor function post-stroke via 33 tasks. Total score (0-66) sums subscales: shoulder/arm (0-36), wrist/hand (0-24), coordination (0-6). Higher scores indicate better function. Units on a scale. FMA-UE was taken at baseline and then at one-month post intervention.
Retention of Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer From End Training to One-month PostRetention of measure comparing baseline to one-month post trainingThe Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) evaluates motor function post-stroke via 33 tasks. Total score (0-66) sums subscales: shoulder/arm (0-36), wrist/hand (0-24), coordination (0-6). Higher scores indicate better function. Units on a scale.
Change in Stroke Impact Scale From Baseline to Post-interventionChange from baseline to post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) measures quality of life and functional recovery post-stroke across 8 subscales: strength (0-100), hand function (0-100), mobility (0-100), ADL (0-100), emotion (0-100), memory (0-100), communication (0-100), participation (0-100). Each subscale score is scaled to 0-100; higher scores indicate better outcomes. The total score (0-100) averages the subscale scores. Change in total score is reported. Units on a scale.
Retention of Stroke Impact Scale - Post-training to One-month PostChange from baseline to one-month post trainingThe Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) measures quality of life and functional recovery post-stroke across 8 subscales: strength (0-100), hand function (0-100), mobility (0-100), ADL (0-100), emotion (0-100), memory (0-100), communication (0-100), participation (0-100). Each subscale score is scaled to 0-100; higher scores indicate better outcomes. The total score (0-100) averages the subscale scores. Change in total score is reported. Units on a scale.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment period: 12/20/22 - 12/15/23 Locations: Medical clinics, community fliers, gyms, events related to stroke, online community groups and members.

Pre-assignment details

3 participants withdrawn for reasons as follow: 1 safety concern pertaining to mobility, 1 upper extremity pain, 1 illness before 1st session

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
Individuals in this group will practice object manipulation tasks without the START (Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy) intervention Sham Control: Practice of Movement task without START
11
START
Individuals in this group with practice object manipulation tasks with the START condition (startling acoustic stimuli applied during 33% of trials) START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy: Application of startling acoustic stimuli during practice of movement task
10
Total21

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlSTARTTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants8 Participants14 Participants
Age, Continuous59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants6 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 participants10 participants21 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 110 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 110 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Total Score From Baseline to Post-Intervention

The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) assesses upper extremity function, specifically arm and hand motor abilities, in individuals with neurological conditions. The test evaluates grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement through 19 standardized tasks. Each task is scored from 0 (no movement) to 3 (normal movement), yielding four subscale scores (Grasp, Grip, Pinch, Gross Movement) that are summed to compute a total score. The total score ranges from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better upper extremity function. Subscale ranges are: Grasp (0-18), Grip (0-12), Pinch (0-18), and Gross Movement (0-9). The outcome measure reports the change in the total ARAT score from baseline to post-intervention, with positive values reflecting improved function. Scores are reported as units on a scale.

Time frame: Time from Baseline to Post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlChange in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Total Score From Baseline to Post-Intervention0.72 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.737292
STARTChange in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Total Score From Baseline to Post-Intervention0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.692582
Primary

Change in Motor Activity Log (MAL) Amount of Use Score From Baseline to Post-Intervention

The Motor Activity Log (MAL) assesses arm use in daily activities post-stroke. The Amount of Use subscale (0-5) rates 30 tasks; higher scores mean more use. Total score averages task scores (0-5). Change in total score is reported. Units on a scale. MAL was taken at baseline and then at one-month post intervention.

Time frame: Time from Baseline to Post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlChange in Motor Activity Log (MAL) Amount of Use Score From Baseline to Post-Intervention-2.045455 units on scaleStandard Deviation 12.02384
STARTChange in Motor Activity Log (MAL) Amount of Use Score From Baseline to Post-Intervention0.388889 units on scaleStandard Deviation 5.085382
Primary

Retention in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)

The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) assesses upper extremity function, specifically arm and hand motor abilities, in individuals with neurological conditions. The test evaluates grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement through 19 standardized tasks. Each task is scored from 0 (no movement) to 3 (normal movement), yielding four subscale scores (Grasp, Grip, Pinch, Gross Movement) that are summed to compute a total score. The total score ranges from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better upper extremity function. Subscale ranges are: Grasp (0-18), Grip (0-12), Pinch (0-18), and Gross Movement (0-9). The outcome measure reports the change in the total ARAT score from baseline to post-intervention, with positive values reflecting improved function. Scores are reported as units on a scale.

Time frame: Comparing baseline to one-month post (1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlRetention in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.603567
STARTRetention in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)-0.666667 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.204164
Primary

Retention in Motor Activity Log (MAL)

The Motor Activity Log (MAL) assesses arm use in daily activities post-stroke. The Amount of Use (AOU) subscale (0-5) rates 30 tasks; higher scores indicate more use. The total score sums the 30 AOU task scores, ranging from 0 to 150. Units on a scale.

Time frame: Retention of measure comparing baseline to one-month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlRetention in Motor Activity Log (MAL)5.0625 units on scaleStandard Deviation 8.174164
STARTRetention in Motor Activity Log (MAL)12.75 units on scaleStandard Deviation 21.731889
Secondary

Change in Stroke Impact Scale From Baseline to Post-intervention

The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) measures quality of life and functional recovery post-stroke across 8 subscales: strength (0-100), hand function (0-100), mobility (0-100), ADL (0-100), emotion (0-100), memory (0-100), communication (0-100), participation (0-100). Each subscale score is scaled to 0-100; higher scores indicate better outcomes. The total score (0-100) averages the subscale scores. Change in total score is reported. Units on a scale.

Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlChange in Stroke Impact Scale From Baseline to Post-intervention0.363636 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.01359
STARTChange in Stroke Impact Scale From Baseline to Post-intervention-0.777778 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.922094
Secondary

Change in Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer (UEFM) Baseline to Post-intervention

The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) evaluates motor function post-stroke via 33 tasks. Total score (0-66) sums subscales: shoulder/arm (0-36), wrist/hand (0-24), coordination (0-6). Higher scores indicate better function. Units on a scale. FMA-UE was taken at baseline and then at one-month post intervention.

Time frame: Time from Baseline to Post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlChange in Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer (UEFM) Baseline to Post-intervention0.090909 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.935849
STARTChange in Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer (UEFM) Baseline to Post-intervention1.555556 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.574602
Secondary

Retention of Stroke Impact Scale - Post-training to One-month Post

The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) measures quality of life and functional recovery post-stroke across 8 subscales: strength (0-100), hand function (0-100), mobility (0-100), ADL (0-100), emotion (0-100), memory (0-100), communication (0-100), participation (0-100). Each subscale score is scaled to 0-100; higher scores indicate better outcomes. The total score (0-100) averages the subscale scores. Change in total score is reported. Units on a scale.

Time frame: Change from baseline to one-month post training

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlRetention of Stroke Impact Scale - Post-training to One-month Post-1.375 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.685018
STARTRetention of Stroke Impact Scale - Post-training to One-month Post2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.391165
Secondary

Retention of Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer From End Training to One-month Post

The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) evaluates motor function post-stroke via 33 tasks. Total score (0-66) sums subscales: shoulder/arm (0-36), wrist/hand (0-24), coordination (0-6). Higher scores indicate better function. Units on a scale.

Time frame: Retention of measure comparing baseline to one-month post training

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlRetention of Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer From End Training to One-month Post-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.291503
STARTRetention of Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer From End Training to One-month Post-0.333333 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.715476

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026