Skip to content

A Study of IMC-002 in Patients With Advanced Cancer Failed to Standard Therapy

An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation and Expansion, Phase I Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Activity of IMC-002 in Patients With Advanced Cancer Failed to Standard Therapy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05276310
Enrollment
62
Registered
2022-03-11
Start date
2022-06-02
Completion date
2029-08-30
Last updated
2026-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Cancer

Keywords

IMC-002, Phase I, CD47, SIRPα

Brief summary

This is an Open-Label, Dose-Escalation and Expansion, Phase I Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Activity of IMC-002 in Patients with Advanced Cancer Failed to Standard Therapy

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and tolerability and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of IMC-002. Multiple-dose levels of IMC-002 will be tested in subjects with advanced cancer.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALIMC-002

Part 1: Dose escalation IMC-002 5, 10, 20, and 30 mg/kg over 3 hours (±30 minutes) intravenous (IV) infusion every 2 weeks Part 2: Expansion cohort IMC-002 20 mg/kg over 3 hours (±30 minutes) IV infusion at the first cycle, if the first infusion is tolerated, then over 1 to 1.5 hours (±10 minutes) IV infusion at all following cycles every 3 weeks In hepatocellular (HCC) Cohort, Lenvatinib 8 mg once daily (body weight of \< 60 kg), or 12 mg once daily (body weight of ≥ 60 kg) In triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) Cohort, Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, or Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 followed by Carboplatin AUC 2 IV infusion on Day 1 and Day 8 of each cycle In biliary tract cancer (BTC) Cohort, Lenvatinib 8 mg once daily (body weight of \< 60 kg), or 12 mg once daily (body weight of ≥ 60 kg) In B-cell lymphoma Cohort, Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV infusion on Day 1 of each cycle

Sponsors

ImmuneOncia Therapeutics Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Part 1: Dose Escalation Part 2: Expansion cohort

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Signed ICF 2. Adult (19 years or older) 3. Diagnosis and prior therapies 3-1. Part 1: Histologically or cytologically proven metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors 3-2. Part 2, HCC Cohort: 1. Histologically or cytologically proven metastatic or locally advanced of hepatocellular carcinoma (excluding fibrolamellar, sarcomatoid or mixed cholangio-HCC tumors) 2. Received ≥1 prior systemic therapy; lenvatinib-naive and eligible for lenvatinib. 3. Child Pugh classification A 3-3. Part 2, TNBC Cohort: 1. Histologically or cytologically proven metastatic or locally advanced of triple negative breast cancer: negative of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) 2. Received ≥1 prior systemic regimen and eligible for paclitaxel or gemcitabine/carboplatin. Patients who have previously received the planned SOC in this study (paclitaxel or gemcitabine/carboplatin) cannot be enrolled. If at least 6 months have elapsed since the completion of a prior SOC (paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and/or carboplatin) and the patient showed a tumor response to that regimen, the same SOC can be used in this trial. 3. Bisphosphonate or denosumab for bone metastases is allowed if started before Cycle 1 Day 1. Prophylactic use of bisphosphonates or denosumab in patients without bone diseases is not permitted, except for the treatment of osteoporosis. 3-4. Part 2, BTC Cohort: 1. Histologically or cytologically proven metastatic or locally advanced of biliary tract cancer (gallbladder cancer, cholangiocarcinoma) 2. Received ≥1 prior systemic therapy; lenvatinib-naive and eligible for lenvatinib 3-5. Part 2, B-cell lymphoma Cohort: 1. Histologically or cytologically proven CD20+ mature B-cell lymphoma according to 2016 WHO classification including: * diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (de novo or transformed) * Mantle cell lymphoma * Follicular lymphoma * Marginal zone lymphoma (nodal, extranodal or mucosa associated) 2. Received ≥2 prior systemic therapies and eligible for rituximab treatment * For all cancer type, neo-adjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy is not regarded as chemotherapeutic regimen for metastatic or recurrent cancer unless recurrence within 6 months after the last dose of anti-cancer drugs as neo-adjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy. 4. Subject must have at least 1 measurable lesion by RECIST 1.1 5. Availability of tumor archival material or fresh biopsies 6. ECOG performance status 0 or 1 and life expectancy ≥3 months 7. Adequate hematologic function, hepatic function, and renal function 8. Prior RT permitted if measurable disease exists outside the RT field or if disease progressed post-RT. RT must be completed ≥4 weeks before Cycle 1 Day 1 9. Agree to use effective contraception 10. Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, and other study procedures

Exclusion criteria

1. Treatment with nonpermitted drugs 2. Prior treatment with a CD47 or SIRPα targeting agent 3. Concurrent anticancer treatments 4. Major surgery or significant traumatic injury prior to Screening or planned major surgery during the study period 5. Previous malignant disease other than the target malignancy for this study 6. Active infection requiring systemic therapy before Day 1 7. Any active autoimmune disease, or history of autoimmune disease 8. Any psychiatric or cognitive condition 9. Known severe hypersensitivity reaction 10. Pregnant or lactating 11. Currently enrolled in another clinical study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)21 daysTo determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of IMC-002
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]through study completion, an average of 1 year* clinically significant changes in physical examination, vital signs, ECG parameters, clinical laboratory tests, AEs * Immunogenicity: anti-IMC-002 antibody

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pharmacokinetics Endpoint : Cmaxthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearmaximum observed serum concentration (Cmax) of IMC-002
Pharmacokinetics Endpoint : Ctroughthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearminimum observed serum concentration immediately before dosing (Ctrough) of IMC-002
Pharmacokinetics Endpoint : Tmaxthrough study completion, an average of 1 yeartime of the maximum observed serum concentration (Tmax) of IMC-002
Pharmacokinetics Endpoint : AUCthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearArea Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of IMC-002
Pharmacokinetics Endpoint : CLthrough study completion, an average of 1 yeartotal body clearance (CL) of IMC-002
Pharmacokinetics Endpoint : t½through study completion, an average of 1 yearterminal half-life (t½) of IMC-002
Efficacy endpoints based on tumor assessment (Part2) : BORTumor assessments will be conducted every 2 cycles by contrast-enhanced CT (solid tumor), and every 3 cycles by PET-CT/CT with contrast (B-cell lymphoma), within 5 days prior to Day 1 of the next cycle, through study completion, an average of 1 year.best overall response (BOR) To evaluate efficacy of IMC-002 in combination with standard of care (SOC) anti-cancer therapy, as assessed by RECIST 1.1 (for solid tumors) or Lugano criteria (for B-cell lymphoma).
Efficacy endpoints based on tumor assessment (Part2) : ORRTumor assessments will be conducted every 2 cycles by contrast-enhanced CT (solid tumor), and every 3 cycles by PET-CT/CT with contrast (B-cell lymphoma), within 5 days prior to Day 1 of the next cycle, through study completion, an average of 1 year.objective response rate (ORR) To evaluate efficacy of IMC-002 in combination with standard of care (SOC) anti-cancer therapy, as assessed by RECIST 1.1 (for solid tumors) or Lugano criteria (for B-cell lymphoma).
Efficacy endpoints based on tumor assessment (Part2) : DCRTumor assessments will be conducted every 2 cycles by contrast-enhanced CT (solid tumor), and every 3 cycles by PET-CT/CT with contrast (B-cell lymphoma), within 5 days prior to Day 1 of the next cycle, through study completion, an average of 1 year.disease control rate (DCR) To evaluate efficacy of IMC-002 in combination with standard of care (SOC) anti-cancer therapy, as assessed by RECIST 1.1 (for solid tumors) or Lugano criteria (for B-cell lymphoma).
Efficacy endpoints based on tumor assessment (Part2) : DORTumor assessments will be conducted every 2 cycles by contrast-enhanced CT (solid tumor), and every 3 cycles by PET-CT/CT with contrast (B-cell lymphoma), within 5 days prior to Day 1 of the next cycle, through study completion, an average of 1 year.duration of response (DOR) To evaluate efficacy of IMC-002 in combination with standard of care (SOC) anti-cancer therapy, as assessed by RECIST 1.1 (for solid tumors) or Lugano criteria (for B-cell lymphoma).
Efficacy endpoints based on tumor assessment (Part2) : TTPTumor assessments will be conducted every 2 cycles by contrast-enhanced CT (solid tumor), and every 3 cycles by PET-CT/CT with contrast (B-cell lymphoma), within 5 days prior to Day 1 of the next cycle, through study completion, an average of 1 year.time-to-progression (TTP) To evaluate efficacy of IMC-002 in combination with standard of care (SOC) anti-cancer therapy, as assessed by RECIST 1.1 (for solid tumors) or Lugano criteria (for B-cell lymphoma).
Efficacy endpoints based on tumor assessment (Part2) : PFSTumor assessments will be conducted every 2 cycles by contrast-enhanced CT (solid tumor), and every 3 cycles by PET-CT/CT with contrast (B-cell lymphoma), within 5 days prior to Day 1 of the next cycle, through study completion, an average of 1 year.progression-free survival (PFS) To evaluate efficacy of IMC-002 in combination with standard of care (SOC) anti-cancer therapy, as assessed by RECIST 1.1 (for solid tumors) or Lugano criteria (for B-cell lymphoma).
Efficacy endpoints based on tumor assessment (Part2) : iBORTumor assessments will be conducted every 2 cycles by contrast-enhanced CT (solid tumor), and every 3 cycles by PET-CT/CT with contrast (B-cell lymphoma), within 5 days prior to Day 1 of the next cycle, through study completion, an average of 1 year.Immune best overall response(iBOR) To evaluate efficacy of IMC-002 in combination with standard of care (SOC) anti-cancer therapy, as assessed by iRECIST(Solid tumor) or Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification(B-cell Lymphoma).
Efficacy endpoints based on tumor assessment (Part2) : iORRTumor assessments will be conducted every 2 cycles by contrast-enhanced CT (solid tumor), and every 3 cycles by PET-CT/CT with contrast (B-cell lymphoma), within 5 days prior to Day 1 of the next cycle, through study completion, an average of 1 year.Immune objective response rate(iORR) To evaluate efficacy of IMC-002 in combination with standard of care (SOC) anti-cancer therapy, as assessed by iRECIST(Solid tumor) or Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification(B-cell Lymphoma).
Efficacy endpoints based on tumor assessment (Part2) : iDCRTumor assessments will be conducted every 2 cycles by contrast-enhanced CT (solid tumor), and every 3 cycles by PET-CT/CT with contrast (B-cell lymphoma), within 5 days prior to Day 1 of the next cycle, through study completion, an average of 1 year.Immune disease control rate(iDCR) To evaluate efficacy of IMC-002 in combination with standard of care (SOC) anti-cancer therapy, as assessed by iRECIST(Solid tumor) or Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification(B-cell Lymphoma).
Efficacy endpoints based on tumor assessment (Part2) : iDORTumor assessments will be conducted every 2 cycles by contrast-enhanced CT (solid tumor), and every 3 cycles by PET-CT/CT with contrast (B-cell lymphoma), within 5 days prior to Day 1 of the next cycle, through study completion, an average of 1 year.Immune duration of response(iDOR) To evaluate efficacy of IMC-002 in combination with standard of care (SOC) anti-cancer therapy, as assessed by iRECIST(Solid tumor) or Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification(B-cell Lymphoma).
Efficacy endpoints based on tumor assessment (Part2) : iTTPTumor assessments will be conducted every 2 cycles by contrast-enhanced CT (solid tumor), and every 3 cycles by PET-CT/CT with contrast (B-cell lymphoma), within 5 days prior to Day 1 of the next cycle, through study completion, an average of 1 year.Immune time-to-progression(iTTP) To evaluate efficacy of IMC-002 in combination with standard of care (SOC) anti-cancer therapy, as assessed by iRECIST(Solid tumor) or Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification(B-cell Lymphoma).
Efficacy endpoints based on tumor assessment (Part2) : iPFSTumor assessments will be conducted every 2 cycles by contrast-enhanced CT (solid tumor), and every 3 cycles by PET-CT/CT with contrast (B-cell lymphoma), within 5 days prior to Day 1 of the next cycle, through study completion, an average of 1 year.Immune progression-free survival(iPFS) To evaluate efficacy of IMC-002 in combination with standard of care (SOC) anti-cancer therapy, as assessed by iRECIST(Solid tumor) or Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification(B-cell Lymphoma).
Efficacy endpoints based on tumor assessment (Part2) : overall survival (OS)through study completion, an average of 1 yearoverall survival (OS)

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

CONTACTSUNG YOUNG LEE
sylee@immuneoncia.com+82 2 6283 5096
STUDY_DIRECTORHEUNG TAE KIM, MD

ImmuneOncia Therapeutics Inc.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 29, 2026