Skip to content

Clinical Performance of Thermoviscous Bulk Fill Resin Composites in Comparison to Conventional Packable Bulk Fills

Clinical Performance of Thermo-Viscous Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations in Comparison to Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations in Posterior Teeth A Randomized Control Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05276154
Enrollment
32
Registered
2022-03-11
Start date
2022-04-15
Completion date
2023-10-15
Last updated
2022-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caries,Dental

Brief summary

This clinical trial will be conducted to compare the clinical performance of the thermo-viscous preheated bulk fill composite in the management of carious lesions in posterior teeth in adult patients over 12 months.

Interventions

OTHERthermoviscous bulkfill composite (Viscalor)

a relatively new product of composite resin which is transformed from high viscosity to low viscosity by the action of head produced by a heating device.

Sponsors

Minia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Have at least two molars supported permanent dentition free of any clinically significant occlusal interference and require posterior restoration and fulfilled the inclusion criteria, patients will be informed about the study and will be given an informed consent. * The two studied materials restorations should be used in approximately the same sized lesions or within the same extensions. * The patient will be reimbursed for attending for the clinical evaluation(s) of their restorations. * Be a regular dental attender who agree to return for assessments.

Exclusion criteria

* There is history of any adverse reaction to clinical materials of the type to be used in the study. * There was evidence of occlusal parafunction and/or pathological tooth wear. * Patients whose history revealed parafunctional habits or use of medications that potentially could cause hyposalivation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
modified United States Public Health Service criteria (USPHS)1 yearscores A,B,C ( A highest score) (C the lowest score) and overall evaluation for the restorations ( Alpha , bravo, charlie, delta) Alpha for the highest score and delta for the lowest scores

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
post operative senstivity1 week

Contacts

Primary ContactAhmed Amr, MDS
drahmedamr999@gmail.com01224406444
Backup ContactMona Riyad, Professor
monariad50@hotmail.com01006608683

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026