Skip to content

Effect of an Intervention to Prevent Acute Kidney Injury Versus Standard Care in High-risk Patients After Major Surgery

Effect of an Extended "Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes" (KDIGO) Bundle Versus Standard of Care Therapy on Persistent Acute Kidney Injury in High-risk Patients After Major Surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05275218
Acronym
PrevProgAKI
Enrollment
480
Registered
2022-03-11
Start date
2023-03-22
Completion date
2027-02-01
Last updated
2026-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Kidney Injury (Nontraumatic)

Keywords

surgery, biomarker, CCL14 protein

Brief summary

There is no specific therapy for acute kidney injury. It is presumed that supportive measures improve the care and outcome of patients with acute kidney injury. To investigate whether an implementation of a supportive extended care "bundle" in high-risk patients for persistent acute kidney injury (AKI) can reduce the occurrence of persistent surgical AKI. In order to investigate whether the extended KDIGO bundle can prevent persistent AKI in patients with high chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14) as well as in patients with low CCL14, patients will be randomized with stratification by the CCL-value.

Detailed description

All patients will receive standard of care therapy according to the standards of our center. After identifying surgical patients with a moderate or severe (stage 2 or 3) AKI patients will be randomly allocated to the control or intervention group according to the CCL14 results which will be measured as part of the study. According to the literature, patients with a CCL14 \<1.3ng/ml are at low risk of progression and patients with a CCL14≥1.3ng/ml are at high risk of AKI progression. In order to have both patient groups included, we will have two groups (patients at low and at high risk of AKI progression) and these will be randomized to receive either standard of care or an extended KDIGO bundle (in total 4 groups). Control intervention / reference test: Patients in the control groups will be treated according to the standard of care. The only two hemodynamic targets in this group are the mean arterial pressure (mean arterial pressure (MAP)\>65mmHg) and passive leg raising test (PLRT) (increase of cardiac output (CO) \<10%). In the intervention groups, an extended KDIGO guideline bundle will be implemented (Discontinuation of all nephrotoxic agents when possible, optimization of volume status and perfusion pressure, consideration of a functional hemodynamic monitoring, close monitoring of serum creatinine and urine output, avoidance of hyperglycemia, consideration of alternatives to radio contrast agents, non-invasive or invasive diagnostic workup, nephrology consultation)

Interventions

PROCEDUREImplementation of the KDIGO bundle)

Comprehensive Implementation of the Bundle recommended by the "Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Group "(KDIGO bundle)

Sponsors

University Hospital Muenster
Lead SponsorOTHER
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult patients (age ≥18 years) 2. Moderate or severe AKI ((defined by the 2012 KDIGO criteria, KDIGO stage 2 and 3), determined by either serum creatinine or urine output) within 72h after a surgical procedure 3. Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease 2. Prior kidney transplant 3. Infections with human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis 4. Hepatorenal syndrome 5. Pregnancy or breast-feeding 6. Participation in another interventional trial that investigates a drug that affects the kidney function within the last 3 months 7. Persons held in an institution by legal or official order 8. Persons with any kind of dependency on the investigator or employed by the responsible institution or investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Occurrence of persistent severe AKI72 hours after start of interventionThe primary endpoint is the development of persistent severe (stage 3) AKI lasting for at least 72h defined as ≥3-fold increase in serum creatinine in relation to baseline or serum creatinine ≥4.0mg/dl with an acute increase of 0.5mg/dl or a decrease in urine output \<0.3ml/kg/h for 24 hours or anuria for 12 hours. Persistent AKI is defined as follows: patients with stage 3 AKI at enrollment require a persistence of 72h or more to meet the endpoint. Patients enrolled at stage 2 AKI require a progression to stage 3 within 48 hours and a persistence at stage 3 for 72 consecutive hours to be considered endpoint positive. Additionally, patients with severe AKI who fail to achieve 72h due to death or the initiation of renal replacement therapy are considered endpoint positive as well

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients with major adverse kidney events (MAKE)90 days after start of interventionComposite endpoint consisting of death or initiation of renal replacement therapy within 90 days or persistent renal dysfunction (defined as a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to \< 75% of baseline) \- The baseline serum creatinine is taken as the value obtained prior to the day of operation
Length of intensive care unit stayup to 90 days after start of intervention
Hospital length of stayup to 90 days after start of intervention
Duration of renal replacement therapyup to 28 days
Rate of renal replacement therapyup to 28 days
Fluid balanceduring intensive care unit stay
Dose of vasopressorsduring intensive care unit stay
Duration of vasopressorsduring hospital stay (up to 90 days after start of intervention)
Rate of infection during intensive care unit stayduring intensive care unit stay (up to 28 days after start of intervention)
Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoredaily at days 1 to 14 after start of intervention
Need of renal replacement therapy (RRT)28 days after start of intervention
Rate of mortality90 days after start of intervention
Rate of persistent renal dysfunction90 days after start of intervention

Countries

Germany

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRZarbock, MD

University Hospital Muenster, Dept. of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Therapy and Pain Medicine

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 22, 2026