Skip to content

Efficacy of the Nanodropper Device on Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Glaucoma

Efficacy of the Nanodropper Device on Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Glaucoma

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05273385
Enrollment
16
Registered
2022-03-10
Start date
2022-10-10
Completion date
2024-12-10
Last updated
2026-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension, Open Angle Glaucoma

Brief summary

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Previous studies demonstrate that smaller eye drops used in the treatment of glaucoma are just as efficacious as their larger counterparts. The proposed study hopes to demonstrate the non-inferiority of using Nanodropper to lower intraoccular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma patients compared to standard of care eye drops.

Detailed description

The proposed study strives to demonstrate the non-inferiority of using Nanodropper to lower IOP in glaucoma patients compared to standard of care (SOC) eye drops in a randomized trial. Primary Aim: Demonstrate non-inferiority of using Nanodropper to lower IOP compared to standard of care eye drops in glaucoma patients. Stable glaucoma participants and ocular hypertension participants of ages 18+ will be randomized to either use Nanodropper for eye drop administration in both eyes OR administer drops regularly (standard of care) in both eyes. Participants will be followed-up at 1 month and 3 months.

Interventions

Device to apply liquid medication to eyes

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER
Icare Finland Oy
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Nanodropper, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Study personnel who will evaluate the IOP and economic endpoints will be blinded to patients' assigned dispenser types for the duration of the study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18 years old or older 2. Diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) 3. Use of prostaglandin analogue (PGA) eye drop 4. Stable disease status (no visual field loss progression or increase in IOP-lowering medications in the last 6 months)

Exclusion criteria

1. Uncontrolled glaucoma 2. Have had eye surgery (including laser procedures) within the past six months 3. Have a diagnosis of acute angle-closure glaucoma and/or other retinal diseases 4. Use of non-PGA class of IOP-lowering medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at BaselineAt BaselineIOP measurement of the eye will be collected at the baseline visit using routine methods including Goldman applanation tonometry and pneumotonometer.
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 11 monthIOP measurement of the eye will be collected at the Month 1 visit using routine methods including Goldman applanation tonometry and pneumotonometer.
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 33 monthsIOP measurement of the eye will be collected at the month 3 visit using routine methods including Goldman applanation tonometry and pneumotonometer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survey3 monthsThe following open-ended questions will be administered to participants randomized to the Nanodropper group at the end of the 3-month study. 1. Would you consider using the Nanodropper for your regular eye drop use in the future? (yes/no) 2. Did you find the Nanodropper easy to use? (yes/no) 3. Did using the Nanodropper cause more irritation compared to normal eye drop bottles? (yes/no)
Conjunctival Grading at BaselineAt baselineConjunctival grading will be performed by a masked ophthalmologist at the baseline study visit. Grading will be performed with redness graded on a scale of 0-100 using the bulbar redness 5-picture validated scale. A grade of 0 is considered to be the least red and therefore a better outcome. A grade of 100 is considered the most red and therefore a worse outcome.
Conjunctival Grading at Month 33 monthsConjunctival grading will be performed by a masked ophthalmologist the 3 month study visit. Grading will be performed with redness graded on a scale of 0-100 using the bulbar redness grading 5-picture validated scale. A grade of 0 is considered to be the least red and therefore a better outcome. A grade of 100 is considered the most red and therefore a worse outcome.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJulius Oatts, MD

University of California, San Francisco

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Baseline visit was done after a wash out period of 4-5 weeks was completed.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous70.2 number of years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
Participants with both Goldmann Applanation and Pneumotonometer IOP Measured6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 70 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 6

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026