Skip to content

Protocol for CAMUS Nurse Delphi Study

Protocol for CAMUS Nurse Delphi Study: Active Involvement of Nursing Staff in Reporting and Grading Complication-Intervention Events - An Approach to Improve Patient Safety and Quality of Surgical Care

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05272592
Enrollment
250
Registered
2022-03-09
Start date
2021-12-09
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perioperative/Postoperative Complications, Urologic Diseases

Brief summary

Multi-staged, international Nurse Delphi study that aims to validate the newly proposed CAMUS System and CAMUS CCI in an experienced nursing staff population.

Detailed description

Background: Comprehensive and reproducible assessment of post-operative complications are essential for reliable evaluation of quality of care and subsequent reformation of hospital safety infrastructure. At present, significant discrepancies exist in complication reporting and grading, and current complication systems lack holistic assessment of patient care by failing to consider and incorporate nursing insight and perception of patient burden. Objective: To gain experienced nursing perspective on current and future complication reporting and grading in Urology, validate the CAMUS-CCI, and quality control the use of the CDC in nurses. Design, Setting, and Participants: The 12 part REDCap-based Delphi survey was developed in conjunction with methodologist review, experienced nursing and urologist opinion. Certified local and international inpatient and outpatient nurses specialised in urology, perioperative nurses, and urology-specific advanced practice nurses/nurse practitioners will be included. A minimum sample size of 250 participants is targeted. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: The survey assesses participant demographics, nursing experience and opinion on complication reporting and the proposed CAMUS reporting recommendations, grading of intervention events using the existing Clavien-Dindo Classification and the proposed CAMUS Classification, and rating various clinical scenarios. Consensus will be defined as ≥75% agreement. If consensus is not reached, subsequent Delphi rounds will be performed under Steering Committee guidance.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Melbourne Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Certified nurses * Local or international nurses * Inpatient or outpatient nurses * Peri-operative nurses * Urology-specific advanced practice nurses/nurse practitioners

Exclusion criteria

* Under 18 years of age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Validation of the newly proposed CAMUS System and CAMUS CCI in an experienced nursing staff population6 months

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026