Skip to content

Immunotherapy With Dinutuximab Beta in Combination With Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Patients With Primary Neuroblastoma Refractory to Standard Therapy and With Relapsed or Progressive Disease

Immunotherapy With Dinutuximab Beta in Combination With Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Patients With Primary Neuroblastoma Refractory to Standard Therapy and With Relapsed or Progressive Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05272371
Acronym
ChIm-NB-PL
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-03-09
Start date
2021-12-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2022-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

High-Risk Neuroblastoma

Keywords

neuroblastoma dinutuksymab beta chemoimmunotherapy

Brief summary

Safety evaluation and initial efficacy evaluation will be conducted in a group of patients as a non-commercial, open-label clinical trial of dinutuximab beta (Qarziba) phase IIa. The investigational medicinal product will be dinutuximab beta (anti-GD2 antibodies against GD2 disialoganglioside on NBL cells) at a dose of 10 mg / m2 / day by continuous infusion for 5 days in combination with irinotecan / temozolomide, topotecan / temozolomide or N5 / N6 chemotherapy GPOH protocol. The study group will be patients with recurrent / progression of NBL or disease resistant to first-line treatment, for whom there are currently no standards of management, and the treatment methods used so far do not give a chance to achieve a permanent remission of the disease. After diagnosis of relapse / progression or resistance to treatment, it is permissible to administer 2 cycles of standard chemotherapy prior to enrollment in the study. The study plans to recruit 20 patients who will receive 5-7 cycles of DB with chemotherapy. The choice of an appropriate chemotherapy regimen will depend on the patient's prior treatment and tolerance. The safety assessment will be conducted based on the registration of the types and frequency of adverse reactions identified on the basis of the registration of clinical parameters, symptoms and / or diseases reported by the patient or identified during the intervention and / or follow-up visits, abnormal laboratory and / or imaging test results. The initial assessment of the effectiveness will consist in comparing the percentage of objective responses obtained and the annual EFS and PFS (imaging tests, including scintigraphy, bone marrow examination and tumor markers). The study also included an exploratory evaluation of the usefulness of immunological, genetic and other studies.

Detailed description

Neuroblastoma (NBL) accounts for 8-10% of all childhood malignancies. It is the most common solid tumor outside the central nervous system in people \<18 years of age. It occurs in 6-11 / 1 million children annually. In Poland, NBL is diagnosed annually in 60-70 patients, in 1/3 high-risk disease (HR). In 90% of children, NBL is diagnosed before the age of 5. The diagnosis is made on the basis of the histopathological assessment of the tumor tissue or the presence of NBL cells in the bone marrow together with elevated levels of catecholamines or their metabolites in the urine. The prognostic factors include the patient's age at diagnosis, stage of disease, tumor histopathology, DNA ploidy, MYCN gene status, chromosomal changes, and initial response to therapy. Due to the different course of the disease, the therapeutic decision is made after determining the risk group based on international criteria (International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Stage System, INRGSS and International Neuroblastoma Staging System, INSS). In the lowest-risk group, management is limited to observation or surgery, and in the intermediate-risk group, only standard low- and intermediate-intensity chemotherapy or combined with radiation therapy and surgery is performed. In contrast, HR-NBL uses intensive combination therapy, including standard induction chemotherapy, surgery, high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CHT) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT), radiotherapy and maintenance therapy with 13-cis retinoic acid and targeted immunotherapy with anti-GD2 antibodies. Treatment outcomes in NBL vary from spontaneous tumor regression in some infants to an OS rate of \<50% despite intensive combination therapy in the HR-NBL group.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTChemoimmunotherapy (Dinutuximab beta in combination with chemotherapy)

Dinutuximab beta in combination with chemotherapy.

Sponsors

Jagiellonian University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Treatment group compared to historical group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of NBL according to international criteria (International Neuroblastoma Risk Group, INRG). 2. Patients 1-18 years of age with HR-NBL with primary refractory disease, disease progression or recurrence. 3. Adequate function of vital organs (if abnormal, dysfunction below grade 4 according to the CTC AE WHO classification, except for disorders defined in the

Exclusion criteria

). 4. Life expectancy ≥6 months. 5. Obtaining the informed written consent of the patient and/or statutory representative for the treatment. 6. Female patients of childbearing potential must consent to the use of effective contraception; Breastfeeding patients must consent to the termination of breastfeeding. 7. Patients who have previously received immunotherapy with DB or other anti-GD2 specific antibodies may be eligible for this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Other side effects in grade 3 and 4 CTCAE (version in force at the time)3 and 4 (version in force at that time).12 months after end of treatment.
Number of episodes of allergic reactions in CTCAE grade 3 and 4 (version in force at that time).12 months after end of treatment.
Number of hematological toxicities in grade 3 and 4 CTCAE (version in force at that time).12 months after end of treatment.
Number of neurological toxicity episodes, regardless of severity.12 months after end of treatment.
The percentage of patients with pupil disorders and / or visual disturbances.12 months after end of treatment.
Proportion of patients with renal or hepatic impairment in CTCAE grade 3 and 4 (version in force at that time).12 months after end of treatment.
Number of cycles aborted due to toxicity.12 months after end of treatment.
Number of cycles in which treatment interruptions due to the occurrence of side effects will be longer than provided for in the treatment protocol.12 months after end of treatment.
Number of episodes of Capillary Leak Syndrome, regardless of severity.12 months after end of treatment.
Number of episodes of cytokine release syndrome, regardless of severity.12 months after end of treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of patients with partial remission assessed during the study and at the last visit.12 months after end of treatment.
Percentage of patients with disease stabilization assessed during the examination and at the last visit.12 months after end of treatment.
Percentage of patients PFS assessed during the study.12 months after end of treatment.
Percentage of patients ESF assessed during the study.12 months after end of treatment.
Percentage of patients with complete remission assessed during the study and at the last visit.12 months after end of treatment.

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactWalentyna Balwierz, Prof.
walentyna.balwierz@uj.edu.pl+48 12 333 92 20
Backup ContactAleksandra Wieczorek, Dr
a.wieczorek@uj.edu.pl+48 12 333 92 20

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026