Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome
Conditions
Keywords
Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome
Brief summary
In our study, it was aimed to evaluate respiratory functions and respiratory muscle strength in patients diagnosed with temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) and to compare them with healthy individuals. The study was conducted with a total of 46 participants, 23 of whom were diagnosed with TMD and 23 healthy individuals, at Batman Training and Research Hospital between August 2021 and December 2021. In the evaluation, the demographic information and clinical findings of the participants were recorded. Mandible movements were evaluated with a digital caliper. For TMJ, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to measure the severity of pain at rest and during activity. Cervical lordosis and shoulder posture assessment was done by distance measurement. Fonseca Anamnestic Index was used for TMD severity classification. Spirometric measurement was performed to evaluate respiratory functions of all participants and intraoral pressure measurement was performed to determine respiratory muscle strength. Statistical analyzes were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 26 program. Significance level was accepted as p\<0.05.
Detailed description
In our study, it was aimed to evaluate respiratory functions and respiratory muscle strength in patients diagnosed with temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) and to compare them with healthy individuals. The study was conducted with a total of 46 participants, 23 of whom were diagnosed with TMD and 23 healthy individuals, at Batman Training and Research Hospital between August 2021 and December 2021. In the evaluation, the demographic information and clinical findings of the participants were recorded. Mandible movements were evaluated with a digital caliper. For TMJ, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to measure the severity of pain at rest and during activity. Cervical lordosis and shoulder posture assessment was done by distance measurement. Fonseca Anamnestic Index was used for TMD severity classification. Spirometric measurement was performed to evaluate respiratory functions of all participants and intraoral pressure measurement was performed to determine respiratory muscle strength. Statistical analyzes were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 26 program. Significance level was accepted as p\<0.05.
Interventions
OTHERClinical Assessment
The demographic information and clinical findings of the participants were recorded. Mandible movements evaluation with a digital caliper. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure the severity of pain at rest and during activity. Cervical lordosis and shoulder posture assessment, Fonseca Anamnestic Index for TMD severity classification. Spirometric measurement to evaluate respiratory functions of all participants and intraoral pressure measurement to determine respiratory muscle strength.
Sponsors
Halic University
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Volunteer to participate in the study. * To be diagnosed with TMD for the TMD group, * To be healthy according to WHO definition for healthy matched group * Being between the ages of 17-50.
Exclusion criteria
* Having any previous pulmonary disease. * To have experienced a TMD problem due to trauma. * Having covid-19 in the last 6 months.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Expiratory muscle test | at the enrollment | Maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) is going to measured using a mouth pressure meter (MicroRPM; MicroMedical, UK) according to the guideline of ATS and European Respiratory Society (ERS). |
| FEV1 (%-percentage) | at the enrollment | This is the percentage of air with pulmonary function test that the patient can force out of their lungs in one second. |
| FVC (liter) | at the enrollment | This is the greatest total amount of air patient can forcefully breathe out after breathing in as deeply as possible. |
| FEV1/FVC (percentage) | at the enrollment | The FEV1/FVC ratio is a number that represents the percentage of patient lung capacity patient is able to exhale in one second. |
| Inspiratory muscle test | at the enrollment | Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) is going to measured using a mouth pressure meter (MicroRPM; MicroMedical, UK) according to the guideline of ATS and European Respiratory Society (ERS). |
| FEV1 (liter) | at the enrollment | This is the amount of air with pulmonary function test that the patient can force out of their lungs in one second. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical Lordosis and Shoulder Posture Evaluation | at the enrollment | Auxiliary tools such as double-tri square, caliper, tape measure and ruler were used for distance measurements. While the patient was standing, the wall behind was taken as a reference, and the wall-acromion, wall-tragus, tragus-acromion and chin sternal notch were measured in centimeters (cm) in free posture. Participants were asked to look straight ahead, in the free posture used in daily life, their heels against the wall, their feet open at hip level. Measurements were made on the right and left sides with the help of ruler and tape measure. |
| Pain assessment | at the enrollment | The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the pain intensity of the participants at rest and during activity for the temporomandibular joint. The participants were told what the meaning of the number values between 0 and 10 on the horizontal chart, divided into 10 equal parts of 100 mm. No pain was 0 points, Unbearable pain was 10 points, Moderate pain was 5 points. Participants were asked to mark one of the values in line with these explanations and the values were recorded. |
| Temporomandibular joint dysfunction classification (Fonseca Index) | at the enrollment | Fonseca Index consists of 10 questions. Participants were asked to answer each question. The scoring method was calculated as 'Yes (10 points)', 'Sometimes (5 points)' and 'No (0 points)'. Classification; TMD-No (0-15 points), Mild-TMD (20-45 points), Moderate-TMD (50-65 points), and Severe-TMD (70-100 points) |
| Evaluation of Mandible Movements | at the enrollment | Maximum mouth opening was evaluated with a digital caliper. In the measurement of maximum mouth opening, the patient was asked to open his mouth as wide as possible. The distance between the cutting edge of the upper incisor and the cutting edge of the lower incisor was measured in mm. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed