Skip to content

Digital Versus Traditional Booking System for Clinical Appointments

A Pilot Study: Comparing Digital to Traditional Booking System for Clinical Appointments

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05270070
Enrollment
61
Registered
2022-03-08
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2022-02-01
Last updated
2022-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Informatics

Keywords

digital booking, telephone booking

Brief summary

In the Canadian Forces Health Services Ottawa clinical administrative resources are currently constrained, directly impacting workflow and patient care. Given the nature of the current EMR and digital health infrastructure, DBS is not currently being employed. Therefore, investigators sought to determine the relative benefit of using an online booking system when compared to TB. To the investigator's knowledge, validation of this type has not been conducted in this setting.

Detailed description

Introduction: The impact of digital booking systems (DBS) on clinical care, administrative efficiency and health care costs have not previously been explored in the Canadian Forces Health Services. No show rates were shown to be reduced by 6-42% percent compared to traditional booking (TB) depending on the system and the clinic. Therefore, investigators sought to determine the relative benefit of using an online booking system when compared to TB. Methods: Main outcome variables included total time for booking all patients between groups including the start to end dates of each intervention, the number of hours spent on the phone / answering emails, and the number of phone calls and emails received, and the number of phone calls / emails regarding booking problems, cancellations, changes and no shows. Descriptive and mean comparative statistics will be used to determine any differences between groups.

Interventions

OTHERAppointment booking system

Patients were sent an email to book an appointment using the telephone/email versus a online booking system.

Sponsors

Canadian Department of National Defence
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Canadian Forces Health Services Centre Ottawa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients that have never been seen for new consultations

Exclusion criteria

* none

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total time for booking all patients~3 monthstotal time taken for DB and TB patients to be booked in a clinic time slot

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Patients Booked~3 monthsPercent of Patients Booked for each group
Average Time Spent per Patient~3 monthsAverage Time Spent per Patient

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026