Skip to content

Interest of Wicking for Ossicular Surgery and Myringoplasty

Intérêt du méchage Pour la Chirurgie Ossiculaire et la Myringoplastie : Essai contrôlé randomisé Multicentrique de Non-infériorité

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05269368
Acronym
MECH-ORL
Enrollment
150
Registered
2022-03-08
Start date
2022-05-16
Completion date
2026-05-16
Last updated
2022-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Otologic Disease, Post-Op Complication

Keywords

Ossicular surgery, Otological surgeries, Wicking

Brief summary

Myringoplasties and ossicular surgery are very common procedures. Following these otological surgeries, most surgeons install a wicking. This intervention consists of placing a wick, absorbable or not, in the external acoustic meatus, after having replaced the tympanomeatal flap.

Detailed description

Myringoplasties and ossicular surgery are very common procedures. Following these otological surgeries, most surgeons install a wicking. This intervention consists of placing a wick, absorbable or not, in the external acoustic meatus, after having replaced the tympanomeatal flap. Putting in place a wicking often requires to remove this wicking, feared by the patient. In addition, wicking leads to obstruction of the external acoustic meatus responsible for functional discomfort (feeling of fullness in the ear, pain, significant conductive deafness) which can last from one to several weeks depending on the type of wicking. Despite these drawbacks, the rationale for wicking has never been established, the choice of wick type is often empirical, and its necessity is sometimes controversial in the literature. Recent studies have studied the absence of wicking as an alternative to overcome its many drawbacks. No prospective, randomized, multicenter study has been performed to show the superiority of wicking in healing following middle ear surgery (myringoplasty, stapedo-vestibular ankylosis, ossiculoplasty) via the duct or the endaural route. The only study with a high level of evidence concerns only endoscopic surgery. This study has the advantage of showing that with comparable audiometric and healing results, the absence of wicking allows a reduced operating time, an earlier reduction in otorrhea and the feeling of blocked ears, and an earlier improvement of hearing. Given this work in the literature, our hypothesis is that tympanic healing is not impaired in the absence of wicking.

Interventions

PROCEDUREWicking

Absorbable or non-absorbable wicking

PROCEDURENo wicking

No wicking after surgery

Sponsors

University Hospital, Tours
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Three experts, independent of the study, will examine the photos three months after the intervention using a standardized evaluation grid based on 10 criteria.

Intervention model description

* Experimental group: No Wicking * Control groupe: Wicking after intervention

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patient (age 18 = or + ), whose mother tongue is French or who understands French language * Ossicular surgery (fitting of a partial or total ossicular prosthesis) or myringoplasty performed endoscopically, from the speculum, from the duct or from the endaural. * Tympanic reconstruction by all types of grafts: cartilage, fascia, autologous fat * Written consent signed by the participant * Affiliation to a social security scheme,

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or breastfeeding woman, patient under legal protection, guardianship or curatorship. * Need for a retroauricular approach. * Need for annulus detachment\> 60% * Presence of cholesteatoma or middle ear tumor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tympanic and external auditory canal healingThree months after intervention.Healing of tympanic membrane and external auditory canal, evaluated blindly by 3 experts, on an oto-endoscopy picture.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Audiometric resultsPre-operative, 3 months, 12 monthsAudiometric results defined by the pure-tone average on 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 Hz frequencies.
Post-operative satisfactionImmediate post-operative, day 7-10, day 30, 3 monthsVisual Analogic scale (0-10 (min-max))
Post-operative painImmediate post operative,day 7-10, day 30, 3 monthsVisual Analogic scale (0-10 (min-max))
Operative time30-120 minutesOperative time of the otology surgery, in minutes
Post-operative stressPre-operative, day 7-10, day 30, 3 months, 12 monthsPerceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) 10-50 (min-max) Never to often
ComplicationsAt any time of the follow-up,up to 1 yearQuestionnaire given to surgeons, allowing description of complications
Post-operative quality of lifeDay 7-10, day 30, 3 months,12 monthsGlasgow Benefit Inventory (-100 (min) to +100 (max))

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactCharles AUSSEDAT, MD
c.aussedat@chu-tours.fr+33247474747
Backup ContactWiebe de JONG, MSc
w.dejong@chu-tours.fr+33247474680

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026