Lower Limb Lymphedema
Conditions
Keywords
Lymphedema, Measurement, Clinical evaluation, Reliability, Concurrent validity, Clinical feasibility, Lower limb
Brief summary
Of all of the different measurement methods that are currently available for use in clinical practice for assessing the same lymphedema characteristic (for example water displacement versus perimetry, both assessing swelling) or different lymphedema characteristics (for example water content in the skin versus hardness of the skin versus thickness of the skin), a clear overview about the reliability, concurrent validity (if applicable) and clinical feasibility is missing for the assessment of lower limb lymphedema (LLL). The objective of this observational cross-sectional study is to investigate the (day-to-day) reliability and clinical feasibility of currently applied measurement tools in patients with LLL.
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTAssessor A (first measurement): measurement methods and questionnaires for the assessment of LLL
pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; perometry at the level of the leg; water displacement measurement at the level of the foot; measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs and a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist and a self-reported disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (Lymph-ICF-LL) that is completed by the patient at the end of this evaluation
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTAssessor B: measurement methods and questionnaires for the assessment of LLL
pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; perometry at the level of the leg; water displacement measurement at the level of the foot; measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs and a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTAssessor A (second measurement: measurement methods and questionnaires for the assessment of LLL
pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; perometry at the level of the leg; water displacement measurement at the level of the foot; measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs and a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTAssessor A (2 weeks later): measurement methods and questionnaires for the assessment of LLL
pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; perometry at the level of the leg; water displacement measurement at the level of the foot; measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs and a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist and a self-reported disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (Lymph-ICF-LL) that is completed by the patient at the end of this evaluation
Sponsors
KU Leuven
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
OTHER
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Patient group * Unilateral or bilateral, primary or secondary Lower limb lymphedema (LLL) * Objective diagnosis of lymphedema: ≥ 5% volume difference between both legs OR ≥ 2 minor/ 1 major criteria on lymphoscintigraphy OR presence of ICG dermal backflow * Age ≥ 18 years * Able to read, understand and speak Dutch Healthy controls \- Age, gender & BMI-matched healthy controls
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant participants * Presence of chronic venous insufficiency C4, C5, C6; deep venous thrombosis; post-thrombotic syndrome * Presence of skin infections of wounds at the level of the lower limbs at the moment of inclusion
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Within-session reliability of pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region | baseline (within-session) | intra and interrater reliability of pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; The grading of edema is determined by pit depth (measured visually) and recovery time from grade 0-3. The scale is used to rate the severity and the scores are as follows: \- Grade 0: No clinical edema- Grade 1: Slight pitting (up to 2 mm depth) - Grade 2: Moderate pitting (2-5 mm) - Grade 3: Noticeably deep pit (\>5 mm) |
| Within-session reliability of skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region | baseline (within-session) | intra and interrater reliability of skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region Skin and subcutaneous tissue is lifted between thumb and index(and, if possible, compared to the contralateral side) Outcome:If skinfold is increased; yes(1), otherwise; no(0) |
| Within-session reliability of skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region | baseline (within-session) | intra and interrater reliability skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region. Skin is palpated with thumb and index (and, if possible, compared to the contralateral side) Outcome: If skin is hardened; yes(1), otherwise; no(0) |
| Within-session reliability of measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region | baseline (within-session) | intra and interrater reliability of measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region. This device can be applied to measure the percentage of water under the skin in terms of the Tissue Dielectric Constant value, making use of a probe with 300 MHz signal. Up to a depth of 2.5mm, this portable device allows measuring free and bounded water in the tissue through which the electromagnetic wave passes. Outcome: %PWC(% Percentage Water Content) |
| Within-session reliability of measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region | baseline (within-session) | intra and interrater reliability of measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region. This device is a relatively recently developed device which consists of a 1-mm-long intender and records the resistance to 50 gram of pressure by using its reference plate and related built-in force sensors. Outcome: The resistance from the skin to deformation when an external force is applied, is expressed as a number in Newton (N) and represents the induration of the skin. |
| Within-session reliability of circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region | baseline (within-session) | intra and interrater reliability of circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; Outcome: in cm for each of the tapeline, but a total volume can be calculated (in ml) using a truncated cone formula |
| Within-session reliability of perometry at the level of the leg | baseline (within-session) | intra and interrater reliability of perometry at the level of the leg; Optoelectronic volumetry (or perometry): a method that makes use of an optoelectronic infrared device to detect volume differences Outcome: in ml. The height of the measurement should be noted as well. |
| Within-session reliability of water displacement measurement at the level of the foot | baseline (within-session) | intra and interrater reliability of water displacement measurement at the level of the foot |
| Within-session reliability of measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs | baseline (within-session) | intra and interrater reliability of measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs |
| Within-session reliability of a questionnaire regarding skin integrity | baseline (within-session) | intra and interrater reliability of a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist The ICC-CQ is the first reliable and valid questionnaire evaluating different kinds of compression and the experience by patients with lymphedema or chronic venous disease. |
| Concurrent validity (only possible in case there are multiple measurement methods assessing the same lymphedema characteristic) of measurement methods for the assessment of LLL | baseline (within-session) | the measurement methods assessing the same edema characteristic (for example: perometry and perimetry are two different methods that both evaluate lymphedema volume or swelling), will be correlated to each other |
| Clinical feasibility of measurement methods and questionnaires for the assessment of Lower lymb lymphoedema | baseline (within-session) | Time efficiency will be examined for each method (timed), limitations regarding clinical feasibility will be listed and scored for each method (present or absent). Finally, an overall ranking regarding feasibility score will be determined based on the reliability (best -\> worse reliability) and time-efficiency (fastest -\> slowest measurement method). |
| Between-session reliability of pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region | 2 weeks | The grading of edema is determined by pit depth (measured visually) and recovery time from grade 0-3. The scale is used to rate the severity and the scores are as follows: \- Grade 0: No clinical edema- Grade 1: Slight pitting (up to 2 mm depth) - Grade 2: Moderate pitting (2-5 mm) - Grade 3: Noticeably deep pit (\>5 mm) A cohort of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor. |
| Between-session reliability of skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region | 2 weeks | Skin and subcutaneous tissue is lifted between thumb and index(and, if possible, compared to the contralateral side) Outcome:If skinfold is increased; yes(1), otherwise; no(0) A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor. |
| Between-session reliability of skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region | 2 weeks | Skin is palpated with thumb and index (and, if possible, compared to the contralateral side) Outcome: If skin is hardened; yes(1), otherwise; no(0) A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor. |
| Between-session reliability of measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region | 2 weeks | This device can be applied to measure the percentage of water under the skin in terms of the Tissue Dielectric Constant value, making use of a probe with 300 MHz signal. Up to a depth of 2.5mm, this portable device allows measuring free and bounded water in the tissue through which the electromagnetic wave passes. Outcome: %PWC(% Percentage Water Content) A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor. |
| Between-session reliability of measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region | 2 weeks | This device is a relatively recently developed device which consists of a 1-mm-long intender and records the resistance to 50 gram of pressure by using its reference plate and related built-in force sensors. Outcome: The resistance from the skin to deformation when an external force is applied, is expressed as a number in Newton (N) and represents the induration of the skin. A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor. |
| Between-session reliability of circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region | 2 weeks | Circumference measurements (cm) with perimeter. A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor. |
| Between-session reliability of perometry at the level of the leg | 2 weeks | Optoelectronic volumetry (or perometry): a method that makes use of an optoelectronic infrared device to detect volume differences Outcome: in ml. The height of the measurement should be noted as well. A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor. |
| Between-session reliability of water displacement measurement at the level of the foot | 2 weeks | 'Gold standard' in which the limb is immersed into a water tank and the weight of the limb is being weighted. A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor. |
| Between-session reliability of measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs | 2 weeks | Bio-impedance spectroscopy assesses the resistance (or impedance) to the flow of an electrical current that is primarily conducted by body fluid. A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor. |
| Between-session reliability of a questionnaire regarding skin integrity | 2 weeks | Between-session reliability of a questionnaire regarding skin integrity: ICC compression questionnaire that should be completed by the therapist The ICC-CQ is the first reliable and valid questionnaire evaluating different kinds of compression and the experience by patients with lymphedema or chronic venous disease |
| Between-session reliability of a self-reported disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (Lymph-ICF-LL) | 2 weeks | The Lymph-ICF-LL is a descriptive, evaluative tool containing 28 questions about impairments in function, activity limitations, and participation restrictions in patients with lower limb lymphedema. The questionnaire has 5 domains: physical function, mental function, general tasks/household activities, mobility activities, and life domains/social life. |
Countries
Belgium
Contacts
Primary ContactTessa De Vrieze, Dr.
Outcome results
None listed