Skip to content

Study of Affective Forecasting Skills in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder

Autonomic and Subjective Correlates of Affective Forecasting Skills in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05268965
Acronym
TRAUPA
Enrollment
97
Registered
2022-03-07
Start date
2022-02-28
Completion date
2023-11-22
Last updated
2025-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-traumatic Stress Disorder

Keywords

Emotion, Post-traumatic stress disorder, Affective forecasting, Virtual reality, Autonomic nervous system, Electrodermal activity

Brief summary

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with a marked tendency to have exaggerated and persistent negative beliefs and expectations about oneself or the world . Although posttraumatic stress symptoms have been shown to be associated with a tendency to negatively anticipate the future, affective forecasting skills (i.e., the ability to predict one's own emotional reactions in response to a future event) have never been explored in PTSD . The hypothesis that the PTSD is associated with a negative affective forecasting bias, characterized by a tendency to predict more intense emotional responses to future negative events.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALExperimental: group comparison

* Standardized psychiatric interview (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview MINI) * State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (Spielberger, 1993) * Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II, 1998) * Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (Jermann & al., 2006) Participant installation and testing: 2 stages (forecasting on a computer, and exposure in virtual reality) Task / affective forecasting: * Step 1: forecasting about one's own emotional responses regarding pleasant, neutral and unpleasant scenarios * Step 2: experience of the same scenarios in virtual reality

Sponsors

University Hospital, Lille
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Understanding and being able to express themselves in French * Understanding of informed consent and signature of the study participation form * Giving informed, dated and signed consent * Benefiting from health insurance coverage * Normal or corrected visual and auditory acuity to achieve normality * Group 1 : DSM-5 PTSD criteria, assessed using CAPS and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5, Weathers & al., 2013) * Group 2: PTSD Criteria A only

Exclusion criteria

Refusal of participation after clear and fair information on the study. * Visual or auditory sensory disability to participate in the study. * Personal history of neurological disease or current neurological disease. * Personal history of current psychiatric disorder or psychiatric disorder (excluding PTSD in patients in the experimental group), assessed via the MINI. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Consumption of toxic substances other than tobacco and alcohol. * Minors or adults under guardianship, under judicial protection, persons deprived of liberty. * Groups 2 and 3: personal history of psychiatric disorder or current psychiatric disorder and taking psychotropic drugs * Group 1: personal history of psychiatric disorders or current psychiatric disorders other than anxiety, depressive, trauma and stress-related disorders and treatment with psychotropic drugs not stabilized

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
difference of arousal assessments measured using the Self-Assessment Manikin between the prediction and emotional experience phasesDuring the experimental task (2 hours)To compare the subjective affective forecasting bias between the PTSD group and the two control groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
subjective correlates of the affective forecasting bias associated with PTSD changes in: valence scores.During the experimental task (2 hours)valence scores using the Self-Assessment Manikin (Likert-type scale ranging from 1 \[very unpleasant\] to 9 \[very pleasant\])
autonomic correlates of the affective prediction bias associated with PTSD: changes in the skin conductance response and heart rate.During the experimental task (2 hours)changes in the skin conductance response and heart rate assessed using a BIOPAC (System, inc).
link between PTSD symptomatology and affective forecasting biasDuring the experimental task (2 hours)PTSD symptomatology assessed using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
link and correlation coefficients between biases measured at the neurovegetative (changes in heart rate and skin conductance) and subjective levels (arousal and valence ratings from the Self-Assessment Manikin) in PTSDDuring the experimental task (2 hours)
link and correlation coefficients between affective forecasting bias and emotion regulation skills within each groupDuring the experimental task (2 hours)affective forecasting bias and emotion regulation skills, assessed using the Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ)
link and correlation coefficients between affective forecasting bias and anxiety and depressionDuring the experimental task (2 hours)anxiety and depression, respectively assessed using the State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), within each group

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026