Lung, Respiratory
Conditions
Brief summary
Assessing the feasibility and testing the accuracy of the developed artificial intelligence algorithms for detection of wheezes and crackles in patients with lung pathologies in clinical settings on unseen local patient data acquired through three digital stethoscopes.
Interventions
The enrolled population will include patients with a history of lung pathologies. Artificial intelligence-based models are developed for classification of wheezes, crackles and normal lung sounds. These AI models will be tested and assessed on local lung sounds clinical data.
Sponsors
Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan
NOABIO LLC
Innova Smart Technologies (Pvt.) Ltd
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Ages all * Written consent provided
Exclusion criteria
* Subject condition unstable * Chest wall deformity or wounds in adhesive application areas * Written consent not provided
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Testing the accuracy of artificial intelligence models for detection of wheeze, crackles, and normal lung sounds by measuring the sensitivity and specificity | 2 months | Artificial intelligence models are trained on lung sounds collected from three different digital stethoscopes named NoaScope, eSteth, and Littmann individually. Data from all three digital stethoscopes is also merged to train separate AI models. These trained AI models will be evaluated based on sensitivity which is the ability to correctly identify wheezes and crackles, and specificity which is the ability to correctly identify normal lung sounds. True positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false-negative (FN) values will be used to calculate sensitivity & specificity using the following expressions. Sensitivity: TP/TP+FN Specificity: TN/TN+FP |
| Clinical validation of AI models for detection of wheeze, crackles, and normal lung sounds by comparison with gold standard | 2 months | AI models will be tested for their clinical feasibility through comparison of results obtained from AI models with that of the gold standard by measuring positive and negative agreement (NPA & PPA). The gold standard is the label given to each lung sound recording by an experienced consultant pulmonologist. The AI model is blinded to these labels and is tested independently for detection of normal lung sounds, wheezes, and crackles |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Performance analysis of three digital stethoscopes: Littmann, NoaScope, and eSteth | 2 months | Performance analysis of three digital stethoscopes NoaScope, eSteth, and Littmann will be evaluated using the sensitivity and specificity achieved by each stethoscope. True positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false-negative (FN) values will be used to calculate sensitivity & specificity using the following expressions. Sensitivity: TP/TP+FN Specificity: TN/TN+FP |
Countries
Pakistan
Outcome results
None listed