Skip to content

TYRO Couples Project Study

Impact Evaluation of the TYRO Couples Project

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05267236
Enrollment
820
Registered
2022-03-04
Start date
2023-04-11
Completion date
2025-08-15
Last updated
2025-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Couples

Brief summary

This study uses an RCT design with repeated measures to test the impact of two different delivery formats for the TYRO Couples curriculum. Eligible study participants are males or females who are at least 18 years of age and within 9 months of release from incarceration. Incarcerated participants randomly assigned to the treatment group receive the TYRO Couples curriculum in-person, whereas those assigned to the comparison group experience an on-demand format. Study results that show no discernable differences in outcomes between groups will make it easier to serve more participants because service delivery formats can accommodate different life circumstances and preferences.

Detailed description

The TYRO Couples curriculum Is based upon the Couples Communication curriculum, and was developed by a Christian, non-profit organization in Ohio called The RIDGE Project. The purpose of TYRO Couples is to provide training and opportunities for participants from families affected by the incarceration of a father to practice healthy relationship skills that build a foundation for healthy and successful marriages and lifelong partnerships. Curriculum components also address healthy financial and employment skills. Previous research suggests the TYRO Couples curriculum is efficacious in increasing skills related to: relationship building, couples communication, conflict resolution, and relationship satisfaction. Typically, TYRO Couples is delivered in-person in a classroom setting. Using an in-person format results in a more personal, organic experience for participants but it requires a commitment that is difficult for some of them are unable to make because of the time and effort that is necessary to meet in a specific place for a predetermined amount of time. On-line access does not offer the same experience as in-person service delivery, but it does offer greater accessibility for participants to learn at their own pace in a self-directed learning environment of their own choosing. In theory, both formats offer program participants different types of access to service delivery and it is not clear if there is a disparate impact on the educational outcomes that define program benefits, which are improved attitudes, expectations and behaviors that promote healthy family relationships and economic stability for their households. Testing the delivery format of TYRO Couples is important for several reasons. First, more research is needed to better understand which prison-based learning methods are more effective on marriage/intimate partner relationship and economic stability outcomes. Although there are some previous studies of best practices for prison-based learning, there are no studies, to our knowledge, that examine the effectiveness of on-demand learning on relationship and economic outcomes among couples affected by incarceration. Second, previous studies suggest that on-demand learning can be a helpful tool that empowers learners to digest the course material at their own pace. Learner control is a theory that derives from several motivational theory underpinnings, which includes attribution theory, motivation theory, and information processing theory. Previous research guided by learner control theory suggests that self-guided, on-demand learning is positively related to greater learner satisfaction and higher levels of learning compared with those who did not use this format. Therefore, it is important that effective, prison-based learning methods are identified and used so that program participants can experience the most robust relationships and economic stability outcomes. Informed by the self-efficacy and learner control theory, the purpose of this study is to assess the extent to which TYRO Couples training delivered in an on-demand format has a disparate impact compared to in-person services on marriage/intimate partner relationships and economic stability outcomes among couples facing incarceration.

Interventions

OTHERIntervention #1: Treatment Group Receiving On-Demand TYRO Services

Treatment group participants receive TYRO Couples curriculum in an on-demand format that is delivered in five 2-hour weekly sessions for a total of 10 hours.

OTHERIntervention #2: Control Group Receiving In-Person TYRO Services

Control group participants receive TYRO Couples curriculum in a live format (virtual or in-person) that is delivered in five 2-hour weekly sessions for a total of 10 hours.

Sponsors

The RIDGE Project
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Midwest Evaluation & Research
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Treatment vs. Control Group Standard services delivered as primary services to participants in both study groups under a shared condition are: 20 hours of TYRO Dads curricula and 6 hours of Core Communication curricula. Optional services available to both study groups by selecting 1-3 hours of coursework from menu of courses that address a variety of needs.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male or Female Adult (age 18 and older) * Incarcerated * Within 9 months of release in OH

Exclusion criteria

* Minor (under the age of 18) * Not incarcerated * Incarcerated but not within 9 months of release in OH

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Outcome Measure 1: Employment Attitudesbaseline to 6-month follow-upWhat is the impact of on-demand delivery (treatment) compared to in-person delivery of the TYRO Couples curriculum (control) on employment attitudes six-months after enrollment? * 4 survey items independently measure the reported frequency of agreement with key co-parenting behaviors using categories on a 5-point scale (1 'Strongly Disagree', 2 'Disagree', 3 'Neither Agree nor Disagree', 4 'Agree', 5 'Strongly Agree'). * Higher scores on 4 items indicate better outcomes (ex. - I can overcome almost any challenge to get a decent job.) Subscales were formed to add the four survey items together and were divided by four. The subscale ranges from 1-5 (the lowest someone can score is 1, the highest someone can score is 5-which is most favorable.
Primary Outcome Measure 2: Healthy Financial Attitudesbaseline to 6-month follow-upWhat is the impact of on-demand delivery (treatment) compared to in-person delivery of the TYRO Couples curriculum (control) on financial attitudes six months after enrollment? * 3 survey items measure the reported agreement for key financial attitudes using categories on a 5-point employment attitudes scale (1 'Strongly Disagree', 2 'Disagree', 3 'Neither Agree Nor Disagree', 4 'Agree', 5 'Strongly Agree'). * Higher scores on 3 items are negative (ex. - I am overwhelmed when I think about my financial situation.) Subscales were formed to add the three survey items together and were divided by three. The subscale ranges from 1-5 (the lowest someone can score is 1-which is most favorable, the highest someone can score is 5.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary Outcome Measure 1: Partner Relationship Attitudesbaseline to immediately after program completion, up to 5 weeksWhat is the impact of on-demand delivery (treatment) compared to in-person delivery of TYRO Couples curriculum (control) on partner relationship attitudes and expectations immediately after program completion? * 8 survey items measure the reported frequency of agreement with healthy partner relationship attitudes on a 5-point partner relationship attitudes scale (1 'Strongly Disagree', 2 'Disagree', 3 'Neither Agree Nor Disagree', 4 'Agree', 5 'Strongly Agree'). * Higher scores on all items are positive (ex. - I want to grow old with my partner.) Subscales were formed to add the eight survey items together and were divided by eight. The subscale ranges from 1-5 (the lowest someone can score is 1, the highest someone can score is 5-which is most favorable).
Primary Outcome Measure 2: Relationship With Partner Behaviorsbaseline to 6-month follow-upWhat is the impact of on-demand delivery (treatment) compared to in-person delivery of the TYRO Couples curriculum (control) on partner relationship behaviors six months after enrollment? * 7 survey items measure the reported frequency the respondent engaged in a series of healthy behaviors with a partner using categories on a 7-point partner relationship behavior scale (1 'Never', 2 'Rarely', 3 'Sometimes', 4 'Often', 5 'Always'). * Lower scores on all items are positive (ex. - How often do you and your partner disagree about religious matters?) Subscales were formed to add the seven survey items together and were divided by seven. The subscale ranges from 1-5 (the lowest someone can score is 1, the highest someone can score is 5-which is most favorable).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from prisons within the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections (ODRC). Enrollment took place between April 11, 2023, and continued through November 30, 2024

Pre-assignment details

The only reason a participant would be excluded from the study after enrollment but before study assignment was if he/she did not provide consent to participate in the evaluation. Or, if he/she provided consent, then decided to revoke consent.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment-On Demand Format
Treatment group participants receive TYRO Couples curriculum in an on-demand format that is delivered in five 2-hour weekly sessions for a total of 10 hours. Intervention #1: Treatment Group Receiving On-Demand TYRO Services: Treatment group participants receive TYRO Couples curriculum in an on-demand format that is delivered in five 2-hour weekly sessions for a total of 10 hours.
403
Control-Virtual or In-Person Format
Control group participants receive TYRO Couples curriculum in a live format (virtual or in-person) that is delivered in five 2-hour weekly sessions for a total of 10 hours. Intervention #2: Control Group Receiving In-Person TYRO Services: Control group participants receive TYRO Couples curriculum in a live format (virtual or in-person) that is delivered in five 2-hour weekly sessions for a total of 10 hours.
417
Total820

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl-Virtual or In-Person FormatTotalTreatment-On Demand Format
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
415 Participants818 Participants403 Participants
Age, Continuous36 years36 years36 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
22 Participants37 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
178 Participants347 Participants169 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
8 Participants19 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
11 Participants37 Participants26 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
194 Participants374 Participants180 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
417 Participants820 Participants403 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
43 Participants61 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
374 Participants759 Participants385 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 8200 / 820
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 8200 / 820
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 8200 / 820

Outcome results

Primary

Primary Outcome Measure 1: Employment Attitudes

What is the impact of on-demand delivery (treatment) compared to in-person delivery of the TYRO Couples curriculum (control) on employment attitudes six-months after enrollment? * 4 survey items independently measure the reported frequency of agreement with key co-parenting behaviors using categories on a 5-point scale (1 'Strongly Disagree', 2 'Disagree', 3 'Neither Agree nor Disagree', 4 'Agree', 5 'Strongly Agree'). * Higher scores on 4 items indicate better outcomes (ex. - I can overcome almost any challenge to get a decent job.) Subscales were formed to add the four survey items together and were divided by four. The subscale ranges from 1-5 (the lowest someone can score is 1, the highest someone can score is 5-which is most favorable.

Time frame: baseline to 6-month follow-up

Population: 111 participants completed the required survey items for this measure in the treatment group; 114 in the control group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment-On Demand FormatPrimary Outcome Measure 1: Employment Attitudes4.16 score on subscaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Control-Virtual or In-Person FormatPrimary Outcome Measure 1: Employment Attitudes4.13 score on subscaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Primary

Primary Outcome Measure 2: Healthy Financial Attitudes

What is the impact of on-demand delivery (treatment) compared to in-person delivery of the TYRO Couples curriculum (control) on financial attitudes six months after enrollment? * 3 survey items measure the reported agreement for key financial attitudes using categories on a 5-point employment attitudes scale (1 'Strongly Disagree', 2 'Disagree', 3 'Neither Agree Nor Disagree', 4 'Agree', 5 'Strongly Agree'). * Higher scores on 3 items are negative (ex. - I am overwhelmed when I think about my financial situation.) Subscales were formed to add the three survey items together and were divided by three. The subscale ranges from 1-5 (the lowest someone can score is 1-which is most favorable, the highest someone can score is 5.

Time frame: baseline to 6-month follow-up

Population: 114 participants in the treatment group responded to the survey items for this measure; 96 in the control group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment-On Demand FormatPrimary Outcome Measure 2: Healthy Financial Attitudes3.76 score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Control-Virtual or In-Person FormatPrimary Outcome Measure 2: Healthy Financial Attitudes3.78 score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Secondary

Primary Outcome Measure 2: Relationship With Partner Behaviors

What is the impact of on-demand delivery (treatment) compared to in-person delivery of the TYRO Couples curriculum (control) on partner relationship behaviors six months after enrollment? * 7 survey items measure the reported frequency the respondent engaged in a series of healthy behaviors with a partner using categories on a 7-point partner relationship behavior scale (1 'Never', 2 'Rarely', 3 'Sometimes', 4 'Often', 5 'Always'). * Lower scores on all items are positive (ex. - How often do you and your partner disagree about religious matters?) Subscales were formed to add the seven survey items together and were divided by seven. The subscale ranges from 1-5 (the lowest someone can score is 1, the highest someone can score is 5-which is most favorable).

Time frame: baseline to 6-month follow-up

Population: 44 participants in the treatment group responded to survey items in this measure; 47 in the control group. It was not required to be in a relationship to be in the study, so there was a very low completion rate for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment-On Demand FormatPrimary Outcome Measure 2: Relationship With Partner Behaviors3.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.417
Control-Virtual or In-Person FormatPrimary Outcome Measure 2: Relationship With Partner Behaviors3.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.471
Secondary

Secondary Outcome Measure 1: Partner Relationship Attitudes

What is the impact of on-demand delivery (treatment) compared to in-person delivery of TYRO Couples curriculum (control) on partner relationship attitudes and expectations immediately after program completion? * 8 survey items measure the reported frequency of agreement with healthy partner relationship attitudes on a 5-point partner relationship attitudes scale (1 'Strongly Disagree', 2 'Disagree', 3 'Neither Agree Nor Disagree', 4 'Agree', 5 'Strongly Agree'). * Higher scores on all items are positive (ex. - I want to grow old with my partner.) Subscales were formed to add the eight survey items together and were divided by eight. The subscale ranges from 1-5 (the lowest someone can score is 1, the highest someone can score is 5-which is most favorable).

Time frame: baseline to immediately after program completion, up to 5 weeks

Population: 27 participants in the treatment group responded to the survey items for this measure; 25 in the control group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment-On Demand FormatSecondary Outcome Measure 1: Partner Relationship Attitudes4.35 score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.824
Control-Virtual or In-Person FormatSecondary Outcome Measure 1: Partner Relationship Attitudes4.15 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.113

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026