Pulpitis - Irreversible, Tooth Decay
Conditions
Keywords
MTA, Calcium Hydroxide, PRF, Pulpotomy, Irreversible pulpitis, Permanent teeth, Medicament
Brief summary
Of all the various pulpotomy medicaments that have been studied till to date, three agents have been selected for this study to compare their efficacy. CH being the control, MTA being one of the most recommended biomaterial and PRF that in addition to being a biomaterial is an autologous agent. Uptil now there have been no prospective trials using these three pulpotomy agents in mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis in our part of the world and even the international studies that have been done utilized different methodologies with no unanimous conclusion. This is the reason that at present this treatment regime (pulpotomy) showing better perspectives cannot be presented with confidence as a predictable treatment option to the patients with irreversible pulpitis. By virtue of this study this challenge is being undertaken. Hypothesis: ALTERNATE HYPOTHESIS There is a difference between the efficacy of the PRF, MTA and CH when used as pulpotomy medicaments in mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis NULL HPOTHESIS There is no difference in efficacy of the PRF, MTA and CH when used as pulpotomy medicaments in mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis
Interventions
OTHERCalcium hydroxide
Calcium hydroxide in the power/liquid form will be used and placed on the exposed pulp
OTHERMTA
Mineral trioxide aggregate will be used as a powder / liquid form and placed over the exposed pulp
OTHERPRF
PRF will be placed directly over the exposed pulp
Sponsors
Ziauddin University
Liaquat College of Medicine and Dentistry
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with permanent teeth with completely formed roots diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis i.e. showing signs and symptoms as spontaneous, lingering pain initiated by hot and cold stimulus and /or radiating. Pulp being exposed or near to exposure by caries or alternatively by trauma.
Exclusion criteria
* CLINICALLY Teeth with * Necrotic pulp * History of swelling, abscess , fistula and/ or sinus tract * Doubtful restorability as indicated by over all Dental Practicality Index- (DPI) \> 2 (Dawood and Patel 2017) will be excluded * Periodontal disease * Uncontrolled bleeding (more that 10 mins.) of pulp after removal of inflamed part. * No bleeding of pulp at all after access into pulp RADIOGRAPHICALLY (with the use of periapical radiographs) Teeth with * Internal/ external pathologic root resorption * Pulp canal obliteration * Periapical / furcal radiolucency * Resorbed roots. * Crestal bone loss Generally patients * With systemic diseases, bleeding disorders, physical or mental disability, pregnant or nursing. * On opioid or steroid therapy or anticoagulants and/or on any kind of antibiotics. * Who have gone through some previous treatment for the same tooth other than filling.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Success or Failure | 12 months | Incidence of pain, swelling, sinus tract formation, tenderness to percussion after specified time period after intervention |
| Radiographic Success or Failure | 12 months | Incidence of Periapical radiolucency or widening and Resorption |
Countries
Pakistan
Outcome results
None listed