Skip to content

Effect of Degree of Polymerization and Linkage of α-glucans on Post-prandial Glucose Response

Effect of Degree of Polymerization and Linkage of α-glucans on Post-prandial Glucose Response

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05266690
Enrollment
10
Registered
2022-03-04
Start date
2019-11-29
Completion date
2020-02-18
Last updated
2022-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postprandial Glucose Response

Keywords

Postprandial glucose response, α-glucans, Polymerization, Decentralized study design

Brief summary

The primary research project objective is to investigate whether a maltodextrin with high degree of polymerization (Roquette Glucidex 2) and a dextran with comparable degree of polymerization (Pharmacosmos Dextran 10) have lower post-prandial glucose response than glucose syrup (Roquette Glucidex 40). To confer further robustness to the results, the post-prandial glucose response will be compared to a negative control represented by a resistant dextrin with a complex structure containing 70% non-digestible dietary fiber (Promitor 70), which is currently used for sugar replacement. Additional key objective is to investigate the safety and gastrointestinal tolerability of the investigational products.

Detailed description

The aim of the present research project is to generate comparative data on post-prandial glucose response (PPGR) of α-glucans varying systematically degree of polymerization and linkage type. These data are expected to contribute to the sugar replacement strategy in food industry. An additional goal of the study is to demonstrate the feasibility of running a PPGR study remotely, i.e. with the participants carrying out most of the procedures at home. Remote clinical trials (so called virtual) have recently started to be implemented in pharmaceutical clinical research with the intent to reduce the burden on participants and investigational sites, narrow gaps with real life conditions, expand recruitment potential and maximize data collection. Nutritional research could be an even more suitable context for the remote approach because of the much lower safety risks for the participants. However, with this innovative approach come new risks (at distance communication with the participants, complex data flows and logistics, lower degree of control on clinical trial execution) that can potentially affect the reliability of the study results and therefore require proper mitigation. In the present study the following measures were put in place to reduce those risks: * Clear and complete instructions will be provided to the subjects on how the carry out remotely the study procedures. * Digital tools and devices used for data capture will be easy to use and the needed software will be pre-installed on a provided tablet. * An electronic questionnaire will be used to induce subjects to follow the study procedures and to assess compliance afterwards. * The heart rate and physical activity tracker will help determining if the subjects have followed the recommendation to avoid intense exercise in concomitance with the PPGR measurement * A certain time flexibility is allowed to accommodate the participants' needs and reduce the risk of drop-outs. * A conservative approach was used in the calculation of the sample size to reduce the risk of the study being underpowered in case of unexpected drop-out rate. * The Metabolic Unit staff will be reachable, during working hours, by the participants to provide technical support and to monitor their safety. * The study staff will be alerted via email every time that an adverse event is imputed in the adverse event collection tool. The two products selected as positive and negative control for the present research project. Comparison of PPGR data generated in the present research project with existing data will allow evaluating the reliability of the remote approach compared to the traditional one.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTRoquette Glucidex 2

Roquette Glucidex 2: Maltodextrins with high degree of polymerization

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPharmacosmos Dextran 10

Pharmacosmos Dextran 10: Dextran with high degree of polymerization

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTRoquette Glucidex 40

Roquette Glucidex 40: Glucose syrup

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPromitor 70

Promitor 70: Resistant Dextrin with a complex structure containing 70% non-digestible dietary fiber

Sponsors

Société des Produits Nestlé (SPN)
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Individual coding

Intervention model description

Monocentric, controlled, randomized, double-blind, complete 4x4 cross-over clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female participant * Healthy status (based on anamnesis) * Age between 18 and 45 years * BMI between 18.5 and 29.9 kg/m2 * Able to understand and sign an informed consent form * Able to respect the study procedures and timelines * Swiss resident living in canton Fribourg (French part), Neuchâtel, Vaud and Valais which is in the competence of Ethical Committee of Vaud * Having wireless internet access at home

Exclusion criteria

* Any known metabolic disease including diabetes or drug chronic intake (aspirin, vitamin C and mineral supplements, steroids, protease inhibitors, antidepressants, anxiolytic, or antipsychotics…) possibly impacting (to the opinion of the medical responsible): The digestion or absorption of nutrients, the postprandial glucose response * Major medical/surgical event requiring hospitalization in the last 3 months * Pregnancy or lactation * Known food allergy and intolerance * Medically known cutaneous hypersensitivity to adhesives, silicon watch-strap and plasters * Alcohol intake higher than 2 servings per day. A serving is 0.4 dl of strong alcohols, 1 dl of red or white wine, or 3 dl of beer. * Smokers * Participant having a hierarchical link with the research team members

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incremental area under the concentration curve (iAUC 0 to 120 minutes) of post-prandial glucoseFrom 0 (product intake) to 120 minutesIncremental area under the concentration curve (iAUC 0 to 120 minutes) of post-prandial glucose in the interstitial subcutaneous fluid as measured by a continuous glucose monitoring (Flash Glucose Monitoring FGM) commercial device (Abbott Freestyle Libre), as absolute values or as relative value to the raise observed for a glucose syrup as positive control and a resistant dextrin containing a non-digestible fiber as negative control

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time of Cmax (Tmax) of post-prandial glucoseFrom 0 (product intake) to 120 minutesTime of Cmax (Tmax) of post-prandial glucose in the interstitial subcutaneous fluid as measured by FGM device
Adverse eventsThrough subject participation, up to 2 weeksIncidence, type, severity and relation to the research product of possible adverse events experienced by the participants during the study
Maximum concentration (Cmax) of post-prandial glucoseFrom 0 (product intake) to 120 minutesMaximum concentration (Cmax) of post-prandial glucose in the interstitial subcutaneous fluid as measured by FGM device
Heart rateThrough subject participation, up to 2 weeksContinuous heart rate measure (recorded by wearable activity tracker)
Physical activityThrough subject participation, up to 2 weeksContinuous physical activity measure (recorded by wearable activity tracker)
Gastro-intestinal tolerabilityThrough subject participation, up to 2 weeksGastro-intestinal tolerability as assessed by visual analogue scale for the following symptoms: 1) Abdominal discomfort, 2) Decreased appetite, 3) Gastric reflux, 4) Nausea, 5) Diarrhea, 6) Headache

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026