Skip to content

Comparision of Two Different Feeding Method in Preterms

Comparision of Two Different Feeding Method in Preterm Infants

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05265143
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-03-03
Start date
2015-01-01
Completion date
2022-06-01
Last updated
2026-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Enteral Feeding Intolerance

Keywords

preterm, feeding intolerence

Brief summary

achievement of optimal postnatal growth by adequate enteral nutrition in critically ill preterm infants is a challenge of NICU. signs like abdominal distension, reflux, vomiting, nec is a factors of discontinuing fedding in preterm. this factors plays a role in decisions about which method of gavage feeding is adopted. we compare two different feeding method to achive less fedding tolerence.

Detailed description

\<1750 gr, \<33 gw infants will enroll study. exckusion criteria: major congenital anomalies major gis anomalies The study infants are enrolled within 24 hours of birth and sequently randomized to either intermitten feeding (IF) and bolus feeding (BF). Intermittent feeding is defined as delivering enteral nutrition and generally giving 60 min and 2 hours no feeding. this circle repeats 8 times in 24 hours. Bolus feeding is the amount of nutrition put into the syringe was kept 10 cm above the baby and the fluidity was obtained by gravity through the orogastric tube. The data of the patients such as feeding intolerance (gastric residual volume more than %50 of the previous feeding volume, gastric regurgitation, abdominal distension and/or emesis ), whether there is a week-by-week feeding intolerance were noted, NEC, time to reached birth weight, time to achieved full enteral feeding, every 5 minutes during feeding, saturation, respiratory rate and heart rates will record.

Interventions

OTHERbolus/intermittant feeding

sequential randomization

Sponsors

Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Research and Education Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 3 Days
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \<1750 gr preterm infants * \<33 gw * admitted to our nicu in first day of life

Exclusion criteria

major congenital anomalies gis anomalies septic shock exitus in 3 days of life \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
rate of feeding intolerence1 monthThe effect of two different gavage tube feeding methods on feeding intolerance

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time to reach full enteral feeding1 monthThe effect of two different gavage tube feeding methods on time to reach full enteral feeding

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFunda Yavanoğlu Atay, md

Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Research and Education Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026