Skip to content

Fast Acute Sedation at Intensive Care vs. High-dose i.v. Anti-seizure Medication for Treatment of Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus (FAST-trial)

Fast Acute Sedation at Intensive Care vs. High-dose i.v. Anti-seizure Medication for Treatment of Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus (FAST-trial)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05263674
Acronym
FAST
Enrollment
140
Registered
2022-03-02
Start date
2022-02-07
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2026-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus

Brief summary

This open-label, randomized multicenter trial aims at clarifying the standard of care of patients with non-convulsive status epilepticus not responding to treatment with benzodiazepines and at least one high-dose intra venous anti-seizure medication.

Detailed description

Persistent epileptic seizures, aka. status epilepticus (SE), are the second most common neurological cause of acute admissions. Around halv of the patients suffers from SE without prominent visible seizures ("convulsions"), which is referred to as non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) and is afflicted with a long-term mortality of \>50% also in patients without concomittant acute brain disease. There are no evidence-based treatment guidelines for NCSE but patients usually receive treatment with benzodiazepines followed by i.v. anti-seizure medication. If seizures continues, further treatment is controversial. The participating centers have long-standing experience in treating NCSE but use different, internationally accepted treatment strategies. Some initiate aggressive treatment with fast sedation at intensive care aiming at immediate seizure control, other estimate that the side effects of sediation does not outweigh the potential benefit and try high-dose i.v. anti-seizure medication that only slightly impair conciousness - often with success. This randomized, open label, multicenter trial (Eudract 2021-003392-34) aims at clarifying the treatment of patients with NSCE not responding to standard therapy. Patients with verified NCSE based on clinical parameter or using electroencephalography (EEG) are randomized into a fast acute sedation group and a group that receives at least one additional, high-dose anti-seizure mediciation. Primary objective endpoint is treatment failure 24 h after randomization as determined by EEG. Secondary endpoints are e.g. seizure-induced neurological damage, treatment-related complications and neurological long-term outcome. The statistical planing aims at showing superiority of aggressive treatment, 140 patients shall be included in a three years period at the University Hospitals in Aarhus, Odense, Roskilde and Copenhagen.

Interventions

DRUGRapid sedation

High-dose Propofol (bolus 3-5 g / kg, maintenance dose 5-10 mg / kg / hour) to - 5 on the Richmond agitation sedation scale (RASS) for 20 hours, and a single anti-epileptic drug should be added as adjunctive therapy. Addition of low-dose Midazolam (max. 0.1 mg / kg / h) is permitted if deep sedation (defined clinically by RASS -5) is not possible with Propofol alone.

Sponsors

University of Southern Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER
Aarhus University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital of Zealand
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Comparison of two treatment strategies

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 120 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients (older than 18 years) with EEG-verified NCSE, according to the Salzburg criteria, who have not responded to appropriate treatment with benzodiazepines and at least one 2nd line i.v. anti-seizure medication according to the current Danish national neurological treatment guidelines (Levetiracetam, Fosfenytoin or Valproate).

Exclusion criteria

* patients with epilepticus status due to acute neuroinfection (e.g. bacterial meningitis or viral encephalitis) * acute traumatic or spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage * suspicion of cerebral anoxia / hypoxia / hypoglycemia / epileptic encephalopathy * contraindications to anti-seizure medication defined in the protocol * contraindications to anesthesia treatment in intensive care * focal motor status epilepticus without relevant conscious influence (Glasgow Coma Scale\> 13) * known epileptic encephalopathy * Clinical need for acute intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients with continued NCSE on EEG after 24 h ("treatment failure")24 hours after randomisationNCSE diagnosed using EEG and defined by the "Salzburg criteria" for NCSE (e.g. Leitinger et al. Lancet Neurology, 2016)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of treatment related complicationsat discharge, on average after 7 dayse.g. tracheostoma, infections
New neurological deficitat discharge, on average after 7 daysNeurological deficits are quantified using National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS, maximum possible score is 42, the minimum score - indicating no deficits - is 0) at admission and discharge. New neurological deficit is defined as increase of NIHSS \>5 at discharge

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

CONTACTChristoph P. Beier, M.D.
cbeier@health.sdu.dk+4565411943

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 5, 2026